Sounds good though, better than Radiohead
New Autechre _5 albums
- KVRAF
- 10161 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Download only and quite pricey
Sounds good though, better than Radiohead
Sounds good though, better than Radiohead
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 10161 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
I must be getting old, its been out for 2 days and I was unawares
-
- KVRian
- 928 posts since 3 Sep, 2011
Thank you 
- KVRAF
- 3878 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
...but not as good as my bowel movements this morning.VariKusBrainZ wrote:Download only and quite pricey
Sounds good though, better than Radiohead
-
- KVRAF
- 3416 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
several hours of music. lot's of really amazing stuff in these. sound design is incredible on a lot of this. sounds like they're shaking out the patches from the live set and getting the ideas off the shelf before hunkering down for new album sessions. i'm stoked they put all this out.
-
- KVRAF
- 3416 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
i don't get the price complaints.. it's 5 eps.. you don't have to buy them all. .you can buy each individually.
each EP is like 45 minutes of music.. so.. the mp3s are $33 for all 5. or about $6 each. seems a bargain to me. shrug.
each EP is like 45 minutes of music.. so.. the mp3s are $33 for all 5. or about $6 each. seems a bargain to me. shrug.
-
- KVRAF
- 3416 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
for 5 EPs each 45 minutes.. seems fine to me but i do this thing where i value to art
go cry me a river on your price complaints.
go cry me a river on your price complaints.
-
twolegstoneworks twolegstoneworks https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7585
- KVRian
- 1426 posts since 12 Jun, 2003 from Denmark
Indeed! Or maybe we're just oldschool.dayjob wrote:i don't get the price complaints.. it's 5 eps.. you don't have to buy them all. .you can buy each individually.
each EP is like 45 minutes of music.. so.. the mp3s are $33 for all 5. or about $6 each. seems a bargain to me. shrug.
- KVRAF
- 8703 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
Random bleep music.
I was skipping through a track and I couldn't even detect the skip.
I was skipping through a track and I couldn't even detect the skip.
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
-
- KVRAF
- 3416 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
i detected no bleeps. i don't know how you can listen to a track like 'foldfree casual' and call it random bleep music.. but whatevs.. different strokes and all that.spaceman wrote:Random bleep music.
I was skipping through a track and I couldn't even detect the skip.
-
- KVRAF
- 15135 posts since 7 Sep, 2008
Just listened to this and well, my mother always told me if I can't say anything nice...dayjob wrote:how you can listen to a track like 'foldfree casual' and call it random bleep music.
Last edited by Mushy Mushy on Mon May 23, 2016 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
What's the reason for the difference in price, I mean all formats are nevertheless printed from the same master copy?
Is it because it takes more bandtwidth to download 24 bit wav than 320 kbps mp3?
24-bit WAV 24-bit Lossless 55.00€
WAV / FLAC 16-bit Lossless 45.00€
MP3 320 kbps – LAME Encoded 33.00€
Is it because it takes more bandtwidth to download 24 bit wav than 320 kbps mp3?
24-bit WAV 24-bit Lossless 55.00€
WAV / FLAC 16-bit Lossless 45.00€
MP3 320 kbps – LAME Encoded 33.00€
- KVRAF
- 8135 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
I guess so. Though in this day and age, the storage and bandwidth argument is pretty thin.Numanoid wrote:What's the reason for the difference in price, I mean all formats are nevertheless printed from the same master copy?
Is it because it takes more bandtwidth to download 24 bit wav than 320 kbps mp3?
If we assume the stuff is mastered to 24bit wav anyway then couldn't we argue it's more work to create the MP3s?
