KVR Audio

pulsarmodular · Post by **pulsarmodular** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:22 pm

martinjuenke wrote: Last not least: is there a possibilty to drag and drop installed modules within the rack (would be helpful to adjust existing patches when new ideas coming along)?

Yes, that would be very helpful to have. It will be done, I just don't know when. In the meantime, if you're using Logic, it's sometimes easier to switch to a non-graphical view and edit the raw parameters to move modules around, without breaking connections. Not too fancy, but it works

aMUSEd · Post by **aMUSEd** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:30 pm

pulsarmodular wrote:
martinjuenke wrote: Last not least: is there a possibilty to drag and drop installed modules within the rack (would be helpful to adjust existing patches when new ideas coming along)?
Yes, that would be very helpful to have. It will be done, I just don't know when. In the meantime, if you're using Logic, it's sometimes easier to switch to a non-graphical view and edit the raw parameters to move modules around, without breaking connections. Not too fancy, but it works

It occurred to me that might be a way to add modules without getting a crash, it worked, but then when I switched back to the full view it crashed

jue · Post by **jue** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:31 pm

Hello,

pulsarmodular wrote:
MIDI clock and sequencer modules are coming....soon. Gate/trigger sequencers will arrive later.

Any change for a gate/trigger delay to vary the start of envelopes?

best
jue

pulsarmodular · Post by **pulsarmodular** » Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:39 pm

jue wrote:Hello,

pulsarmodular wrote:
MIDI clock and sequencer modules are coming....soon. Gate/trigger sequencers will arrive later.

Any change for a gate/trigger delay to vary the start of envelopes?

best
jue

Hi Jue,
The gate signal that triggers the envelope, yes, that's pretty much what it's for. To modify the actual envelope timings, no - you'll need to use DAW automation for that. No plans at the moment to add CV controlled ADSR.

jue · Post by **jue** » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:28 pm

Hello,
not shure we were talking about the same thing, sorry.
I am asking for something like that:
http://www.doepfer.de/a162.htm
It could be used to vary the start time of each ADSR not to change the ADSR values themselves.
In the moment all three envelopes start at the same time.
best
jue

pulsarmodular · Post by **pulsarmodular** » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:34 pm

jue wrote:Hello,
not shure we were talking about the same thing, sorry.
I am asking for something like that:
http://www.doepfer.de/a162.htm
It could be used to vary the start time of each ADSR not to change the ADSR values themselves.
In the moment all three envelopes start at the same time.
best
jue

Okay, I see. Yes, I would like to add that as well as looping EGs.

nordickvr · Post by **nordickvr** » Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:13 pm

pulsarmodular wrote: Okay, I see. Yes, I would like to add that as well as looping EGs.

Big + 1 here!

thetechnobear · Post by **thetechnobear** » Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:28 pm

really nice youtube video by AiynZahevSounds -

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Wed Jun 22, 2016 4:47 pm

Any eta on sequencer ? Will it have midi controllable pattern change ?

pulsarmodular · Post by **pulsarmodular** » Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:34 pm

topaz wrote:Any eta on sequencer ? Will it have midi controllable pattern change ?

It's already available in the latest build. Initially all controls had hardcoded MIDI mappings but I've not done that yet for the newly added modules, including the sequencer. Probably will look into adding MIDI learn soon. You can use automation now however.

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:54 pm

Cool, can the 2 8 steps be chained to give 16 steps ?
Is there any way to change patterns or is it stuck to 1 ?

I heard it wouldn't work in live 9 (I'm on Mac) is this true ?

pulsarmodular · Post by **pulsarmodular** » Wed Jun 22, 2016 7:18 pm

topaz wrote:Cool, can the 2 8 steps be chained to give 16 steps ?
Is there any way to change patterns or is it stuck to 1 ?

I heard it wouldn't work in live 9 (I'm on Mac) is this true ?

Basically, the 8 stage modules are programmable, but the programmer module to chain and control stepping is not ready yet!

So for now, they are quite limited but still useful.

It works fine in Live 9.

Live9Grab.jpg

topaz · Post by **topaz** » Wed Jun 22, 2016 7:57 pm

Ok will check the demo ASAP

chilly7 · Post by **chilly7** » Tue Jun 28, 2016 6:01 pm

whyterabbyt wrote:I hope the developer is aware that there was previously a product called the 'Pulsar Modular', by Creamware, still sold as the SCOPE Modular, and that there's a vague possibility that this may be construed as a trademark infringement or 'passing off' violation. Friendly advice : it might be safest to contact SCOPE, the company that now owns the IP of Creamware and confirm that they have no objections, before they raise some.

That is so stupid. Why somebody cannot have the same name too?

P.s. That's why English language is dummed. In order not to violet rules of this forum of not speaking about religion i can say that better to use language and writing system i use because it cannot be trade marked and copyrighted because it belongs to the head of my religion. And the head of my religion alows to use it to awrybody for free with no copyright bullshit.
The example of language and writhing system i am tolking about is in my signature for web site.

whyterabbyt · Post by **whyterabbyt** » Tue Jun 28, 2016 6:59 pm

chilly7 wrote:
whyterabbyt wrote:I hope the developer is aware that there was previously a product called the 'Pulsar Modular', by Creamware, still sold as the SCOPE Modular, and that there's a vague possibility that this may be construed as a trademark infringement or 'passing off' violation. Friendly advice : it might be safest to contact SCOPE, the company that now owns the IP of Creamware and confirm that they have no objections, before they raise some.
That is so stupid. Why somebody cannot have the same name too?

Who said they can't have the same name? I said very clearly that it'd be fine if there's no objection from the other company, if they have such a trademark in the first place.

P.s. That's why English language is dummed.

Its absolutely nothing to do with the English language, that's just complete stupidity on your part.. Its about trademarks, which can be real words, made-up words, visual symbols even sounds. If something is registered as a trademark, reuse of that trademark has certain legal implications.

In order not to violet rules of this forum of not speaking about religion i can say that better to use language and writing system i use because it cannot be trade marked and copyrighted because it belongs to the head of my religion. And the head of my religion alows to use it to awrybody for free with no copyright bullshit.
The example of language and writhing system i am tolking about is in my signature for web site.

Any part of your cult's private language could legitimately be used as a trademark, giving it the exact same restrictions on reuse as any other symbol or word. Your failure to understand that wont change anything, so take your nonsense to some thread of your own, instead of disrupting this one with your usual silly.

Pulsar 900 Series