Cons And Limitations Of "Free" DAWs

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Robert Randolph wrote:
Numanoid wrote:
stanlea wrote:Ardour 5
Not a turn key system.
Users need to be more engineers than musicians having to build the free version themselves.
Not really. It's quite easy to get it free via your distro's package manager.
On Windows ?

Post

Ardour on Windows is donationware. For free You can only get a demo.
Numanoid wrote:And their problem is that they are not freeware :wink:
Yes, but Reaper isn't exactly free either and is on the top of OP's list.

Basically one can say, that even T7 (30$) or Podium (50$) is cheaper than Reaper here.

Post

Tracktion 5 or Podium Free looks like the best totally free options.

T5 was launched just over 2 years ago

http://www.kvraudio.com/news/tracktion- ... on-5-24865

Post

T5 is not locked to one core like Podium Free. It's a full commercial version.
All plugins may go top-speed, but not everyone may like the layout and interface...

Post

Numanoid wrote:No, loading third party plugs is Studio One Prime's problem :P
And Pro Tools First only loads plugins bought from the Avid Marketplace :P

It's a far cry from the old free versions of Pro Tools.

Post

Kumi_27 wrote:but not everyone may like the layout and interface...
Compared to FL Studio or ReNoise, Tracktion interface seems quite normal

Post

Numanoid wrote:
Robert Randolph wrote:
Numanoid wrote:
stanlea wrote:Ardour 5
Not a turn key system.
Users need to be more engineers than musicians having to build the free version themselves.
Not really. It's quite easy to get it free via your distro's package manager.
On Windows ?
I don't know about windows, what package manager does it use? :borg:

Post

Robert Randolph wrote:I don't know about windows, what package manager does it use? :borg:
Well it doesn't use one

But we can get the source code:

You'll need to build this yourself. That can be a challenging and complex process, especially on Windows and OS X. '

So as I said, more for engineers, than musicians.

Post

Numanoid wrote:Compared to FL Studio or ReNoise, Tracktion interface seems quite normal
But doesn't have the virtual console mixer. And afaik is single-screen only.

Post

Numanoid wrote:
Robert Randolph wrote:I don't know about windows, what package manager does it use? :borg:
Well it doesn't use one

But we can get the source code:

You'll need to build this yourself. That can be a challenging and complex process, especially on Windows and OS X. '

So as I said, more for engineers, than musicians.
Or you could pay a $1 donation to get a built version.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

Paying $1 means it isn't free

Then it is a different topic, it is certainly cheap, but has nothing to do with free daws

Post

whyterabbyt wrote:
Numanoid wrote:
Robert Randolph wrote:I don't know about windows, what package manager does it use? :borg:
Well it doesn't use one

But we can get the source code:

You'll need to build this yourself. That can be a challenging and complex process, especially on Windows and OS X. '

So as I said, more for engineers, than musicians.
Or you could pay a $1 donation to get a built version.
Thanks whyterabbyt - Let's say that Ardour if "near almost" free, users pay for a built version. The source code remains free, and Linux users can effectively get it with their distribution.
I didn't mean that Ardour is the best ultimate sequencer, but I'm tired of the Ardour bashing here and there. Some will like it, others no : that's life.
You can't always get what you waaaant...

Post

stanlea wrote:I didn't mean that Ardour is the best ultimate sequencer, but I'm tired of the Ardour bashing here and there. Some will like it, others no : that's life.
I am not bashing Ardour, but I wouldn't call it free to use (for the not tech-savvy)

It certainly can be had for cheap, but cheap is not free

Post

Numanoid wrote:Paying $1 means it isn't free

Then it is a different topic, it is certainly cheap, but has nothing to do with free daws
So you're arguing that somehow, as a DAW, the free version is more for engineers than musicians, while the $1 is fine for both.

Despite it being the same DAW.

That makes sense.

I wonder whether you think its still more suitable for engineers if someone else builds it and gives it to a musician for free?

BTW, topic has the word 'free' apostrophised, and the OP mentioned Reaper, which is only free as a demo version. So you probably need to check whether $1 counts as being close enough to "free" (sic) or not before you speak for the OP's intent.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

whyterabbyt wrote:That makes sense
Thanks for acknowledging that, I know when I am right :)

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”