Could be, but which came first, chicken or egg?Synthetic Wav wrote:sylenth also become popular cause of the presets , as many trance producers have no clue how to tweak a synth execept tweaking the cutoff and spreading the unisson
Now Hive is here, is it RIP Sylenth?
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Actually quite good IMHO, prefer it over Sylenth and Spire in the rawer state, but in the mix&cooked, somehow it's Spire>Hive>Sylenth, take this with grain of salt, just tried it on few occasions and mainly were interested about who will "win", Spire just cuts trough better and I'm sucker for more plastic sound, so yeah, it's hard to be more plastic than Spire in the end of the day.recursive one wrote:Not sure how Hive handles these kinds of things - psytrance rolling basslines
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here?
ShawnG
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Ooopschk071 wrote:I also think that Spire exceeds both of these synths, but, hey, the topic was Hive killing Sylenth.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here?
ShawnG
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
Well but here is a question. Did Markus Schulz tried Diva? Hive? Zebra? Dune 2? Harmor?
what he would say about them? this is what i mean by being technologicly not "clever" 
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
My experience is that Sylenth works better that Spire in an actual mix. I've just replaced Sylenth with Spire in one of my currently wip tracks and after spending several days trying to make it fit I decided to go back to Sylenth. It just has more balls for this specific sound despite Spire's xcomp, boost and great onboard eq, and this is kinda strange because Spire usually cuts through the mix much better for most other sounds.Zexila wrote:Actually quite good IMHO, prefer it over Sylenth and Spire in the rawer state, but in the mix&cooked, somehow it's Spire>Hive>Sylenth, take this with grain of salt, just tried it on few occasions and mainly were interested about who will "win", Spire just cuts trough better and I'm sucker for more plastic sound, so yeah, it's hard to be more plastic than Spire in the end of the day.recursive one wrote:Not sure how Hive handles these kinds of things - psytrance rolling basslines
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I'm sure he's at least aware of most of those. Don't get me wrong, i'm not someone who gives much on artist endorsements, because those are most likely being stated positively anyway, because both industries benefit from each other, but, he also said that Spire sounds nice, but in another place has stated that it used too much CPU to really use it in his tracks.Elektronisch wrote:Well but here is a question. Did Markus Schulz tried Diva? Hive? Zebra? Dune 2? Harmor?what he would say about them? this is what i mean by being technologicly not "clever"
-
- KVRist
- 406 posts since 27 Feb, 2014 from France
i was thinking of the bundled presets ,i was joking but i have still some friends making trance since a decade or more and know very little about synthesis, sylenth was the perfect synth for them ( or a virus ) basically they jumped from vangard to sylenth if i recall rightchk071 wrote:Could be, but which came first, chicken or egg?Synthetic Wav wrote:sylenth also become popular cause of the presets , as many trance producers have no clue how to tweak a synth execept tweaking the cutoff and spreading the unissonIf there's many presets for specific genres, there's got to be a target audience for those.
Analog electronic drum samples (Free demo pack)
http://www.syntheticwav.com
http://www.syntheticwav.com
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Yeah, all depends on context really, that's why I said "wins", I usually start with "obvious fat" and crunchy and end up with lifeless plastic thin bass that probably any synth can do really if you put it trough the same effects chain, Spire just get's there faster naturally and envelopes are more flexible to squeeze little extra, again, totally personal thing here, majority of people actually dislike that sort of plastic lazery bass-es, I'm just sucker for them.recursive one wrote:My experience is that Sylenth works better that Spire in an actual mix. I've just replaced Sylenth with Spire in one of my currently wip tracks and after spending several days trying to make it fit I decided to go back to Sylenth. It just has more balls for this specific sound despite Spire's xcomp, boost and great onboard eq, and this is kinda strange because Spire usually cuts through the mix much better for most other sounds.
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here?
ShawnG
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
Hive - Sylenth for hipsters. 
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here?
ShawnG
-
- KVRist
- 259 posts since 16 Jun, 2015
A lot of musicians just want to get a sound that's "good enough" so they can focus on the music. There's a difference between being a technologist and being a musician, and while one person could be both those things, it isn't a moral imperative.
This thread has a lot of strange ideas about why Sylenth1 is still so popular when there are so many "better" options out there...
This thread has a lot of strange ideas about why Sylenth1 is still so popular when there are so many "better" options out there...
Makin' Music Great Again 
- KVRAF
- 26937 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Exactly... it also became extra popular because of how easy it was to pirate.recursive one wrote:I think "the Sylenth fenomenon" is easily explained by the fact that it has hit the market in the right time. Uplifting trance was extremely popular, everybody was raving about Virus and JP80x0 which were crazy expensive, plugin synths were in their early teens and suddenly a 200 dollar VSTi does this trance thing almost as good as the hardware. Should Sylenth be first released after 2014 i think it would be put into "nice but nothing special" cathegory by most users.chk071 wrote: All i can say is that with Sylenth1 for example, it really is no coincidental accident, or marketing (they didn't do that at all AFAIC), that it became so popular for "that" sound. It just is damn good at that.
- KVRAF
- 26937 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Hive is significantly easier to use than Sylenth. Hive is the fastest GUI I have used.aumordia wrote:Don't underestimate the importance of ergonomics. Sylenth1 always has been the total package, even back when it had a butt ugly Synthedit GUI. I looked at it (and others) here and there for years while I was in FL land, only finally pulled the trigger when I switched. I'm honestly surprised I bought it, I thought for sure something would supplant it.
The thing is, there are all these synths that can do things Sylenth1 objectively can't, but I don't see anything else that can do what I (subjectively) say Sylenth1 has a near monopoly on: steering you past the bad sounds and letting you rapidly dial in your own great sounds without sucking you down a rabbit hole of tweaking. I'd call it the Apple of soft synths except that it's historically been too ugly for that title
- KVRAF
- 26937 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
I agree in general... It is one of a number of synths that have surpassed Sylenth. It is the collective competition that killed it.chk071 wrote:I simply posted why IMO Hive isn't a Sylenth killer, as proposed in the thread title, and laid out the reasons why i don't think it is.
