Amount of soundsets, mouth to mouth propaganda, artist endorsements... that kind of stuff i guess. I can only tell that Hive seems to be less popular in EDM music than Sylenth1 or Spire (based on artist statements, and sites which list used equipment from popular artists, and also on the amount of soundsets for those genres). If it is more popular in other genres, or more popular in general, i can't tell. Judging from opinions here, on KVR, i would say it is popular among the usual u-he product users.wagtunes wrote:Well, people seem to know (or think they know) that Sylenth1 is one of the most popular synths around, used by just about everybody in the business. So how do they know this?chk071 wrote:Who knows.wagtunes wrote:Stupid question time.
Is Hive a popular synth? More specifically, is it as popular as Sylenth1?
Now Hive is here, is it RIP Sylenth?
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
- KVRAF
- 22876 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Pretty much. But then again, longer and larger are also relative terms as well. Larger could be much larger or, depending on how big a market U-he has, not so much larger. Or it could be miles apart. But still it comes down to how people know that Sylenth1 sells at all as nobody but the developer has access to the sales figures.mcnoone wrote:Then it is the first sentence of my post that is the reason.wagtunes wrote:The synth being "good" was not the reason for my question. Good is all subjective and a meaningless term. I have other reasons for asking.mcnoone wrote:Sylenth has been out much longer, and therefore has had many years to acquire a larger user base.wagtunes wrote:Stupid question time.
Is Hive a popular synth? More specifically, is it as popular as Sylenth1?
Though we all know that popularity does not always mean something is good.
Point is, when people talk about how "popular" Sylenth1 is, how do they really know? They can't possibly know that any more so than they know how popular Hive is. It's all just guess work.
- KVRAF
- 22876 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
So in other words, probably similar in popularity to Zebra 2, Diva and possibly even Bazille though I would think a modular synth like that would have less of a following. And again, that is just guess work as well.chk071 wrote:Amount of soundsets, mouth to mouth propaganda, artist endorsements... that kind of stuff i guess. I can only tell that Hive seems to be less popular in EDM music than Sylenth1 or Spire (based on artist statements, and sites which list used equipment from popular artists, and also on the amount of soundsets for those genres). If it is more popular in other genres, or more popular in general, i can't tell. Judging from opinions here, on KVR, i would say it is popular among the usual u-he product users.wagtunes wrote:Well, people seem to know (or think they know) that Sylenth1 is one of the most popular synths around, used by just about everybody in the business. So how do they know this?chk071 wrote:Who knows.wagtunes wrote:Stupid question time.
Is Hive a popular synth? More specifically, is it as popular as Sylenth1?
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
Sorry to say, but my tolerance toward the word "relative" is at an all time low. They are objective words. Any words regarding measure? Are objective. We can measure the "time" and measure the "amount of users" ...all objective meanings.wagtunes wrote:Pretty much. But then again, longer and larger are also relative terms as well. Larger could be much larger or, depending on how big a market U-he has, not so much larger. Or it could be miles apart. But still it comes down to how people know that Sylenth1 sells at all as nobody but the developer has access to the sales figures.mcnoone wrote:Then it is the first sentence of my post that is the reason.wagtunes wrote:The synth being "good" was not the reason for my question. Good is all subjective and a meaningless term. I have other reasons for asking.mcnoone wrote:Sylenth has been out much longer, and therefore has had many years to acquire a larger user base.wagtunes wrote:Stupid question time.
Is Hive a popular synth? More specifically, is it as popular as Sylenth1?
Though we all know that popularity does not always mean something is good.
Point is, when people talk about how "popular" Sylenth1 is, how do they really know? They can't possibly know that any more so than they know how popular Hive is. It's all just guess work.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
You only hear the difference because even subtle effects do change the sound.mcnoone wrote:I disagree. Subtle use of effects as opposed to the whole sound relying on them is a big difference.fluffy_little_something wrote:All effects are sound-altering, else they would not be used.
Well, when you turn all effects of your patch off and switch to clean filter mode, it is a rather bland standard sound that Sylenth1 can make as well. And with similar effects on on both, the results are also similar
Doesn't matter what you say about it, as if you can't do the sound with one oscillator and one filter, then it means that Hive is the synth that is easier to use, and less is required to acquire some kind of sound, which is what the discussion was leaning toward, seeing how so many people said its easier to use to get some kind of sound. Apparently it isn't capable of replicating the sounds I posted, or else you would have posted the recordings and patches themselves as evidence to back up your claim.
Use anything you want in Sylenth. Let's see how much easier it is.
If you need to use more, and tweak more, to obtain some said sound using Sylenth. Then it isn't easier to use. Point made.
I have not said Sylenth1 is easier or more difficult to use. I was referring to the claim someone made that Hive has a much wider sound spectrum. That is nonsense in my view. I can make most any Hive sound in Sylenth1 as well, even if it takes different settings than on Hive.
I don't have Sylenth1 installed anymore, some parts of it are deactivated in the demo anyway if I remember correctly, I might download it tomorrow. But I have made hundreds of patches on it, so I guess I can say that I am aware which sounds it can make and which it can't make.
- KVRAF
- 22876 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
They may be objective but they're not hard numbers. Is larger 1,000 more owners or 10,000 more owners? What's the spread between the two synths? Even the developers can't answer that because each developer doesn't have access to the other's sales figures. So all they'd be doing is guessing as well.mcnoone wrote:Sorry to say, but my tolerance toward the word "relative" is at an all time low. They are objective words. Any words regarding measure? Are objective. We can measure the "time" and measure the "amount of users" ...all objective meanings.wagtunes wrote:Pretty much. But then again, longer and larger are also relative terms as well. Larger could be much larger or, depending on how big a market U-he has, not so much larger. Or it could be miles apart. But still it comes down to how people know that Sylenth1 sells at all as nobody but the developer has access to the sales figures.mcnoone wrote:Then it is the first sentence of my post that is the reason.wagtunes wrote:The synth being "good" was not the reason for my question. Good is all subjective and a meaningless term. I have other reasons for asking.mcnoone wrote:Sylenth has been out much longer, and therefore has had many years to acquire a larger user base.wagtunes wrote:Stupid question time.
Is Hive a popular synth? More specifically, is it as popular as Sylenth1?
Though we all know that popularity does not always mean something is good.
Point is, when people talk about how "popular" Sylenth1 is, how do they really know? They can't possibly know that any more so than they know how popular Hive is. It's all just guess work.
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Ure stated the sales number this year of the u-he synths earlier:wagtunes wrote:So in other words, probably similar in popularity to Zebra 2, Diva and possibly even Bazille though I would think a modular synth like that would have less of a following. And again, that is just guess work as well.chk071 wrote:Amount of soundsets, mouth to mouth propaganda, artist endorsements... that kind of stuff i guess. I can only tell that Hive seems to be less popular in EDM music than Sylenth1 or Spire (based on artist statements, and sites which list used equipment from popular artists, and also on the amount of soundsets for those genres). If it is more popular in other genres, or more popular in general, i can't tell. Judging from opinions here, on KVR, i would say it is popular among the usual u-he product users.wagtunes wrote:Well, people seem to know (or think they know) that Sylenth1 is one of the most popular synths around, used by just about everybody in the business. So how do they know this?chk071 wrote:Who knows.wagtunes wrote:Stupid question time.
Is Hive a popular synth? More specifically, is it as popular as Sylenth1?
FWIW.Urs wrote: Bestsellers this year so far in numbers currently are Diva, followed by Zebra, Hive, ACE, Satin, Bazille, Presswerk, others in that order, where Hive sells about almost as often as Zebra and a bit more than half of Diva. Hive also sells about twice as often as ACE, so we can safely say it has become our third flagship product.
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
People do not know the amounts of users, except for the dev team. So that is a valid point.wagtunes wrote: Point is, when people talk about how "popular" Sylenth1 is, how do they really know? They can't possibly know that any more so than they know how popular Hive is. It's all just guess work.
Yet the amount of time since release is important too, and that is something we all know about.
- KVRAF
- 22876 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Thanks. That helps me a ton.chk071 wrote:Ure stated the sales number this year of the u-he synths earlier:wagtunes wrote:So in other words, probably similar in popularity to Zebra 2, Diva and possibly even Bazille though I would think a modular synth like that would have less of a following. And again, that is just guess work as well.chk071 wrote:Amount of soundsets, mouth to mouth propaganda, artist endorsements... that kind of stuff i guess. I can only tell that Hive seems to be less popular in EDM music than Sylenth1 or Spire (based on artist statements, and sites which list used equipment from popular artists, and also on the amount of soundsets for those genres). If it is more popular in other genres, or more popular in general, i can't tell. Judging from opinions here, on KVR, i would say it is popular among the usual u-he product users.wagtunes wrote:Well, people seem to know (or think they know) that Sylenth1 is one of the most popular synths around, used by just about everybody in the business. So how do they know this?chk071 wrote:Who knows.wagtunes wrote:Stupid question time.
Is Hive a popular synth? More specifically, is it as popular as Sylenth1?FWIW.Urs wrote: Bestsellers this year so far in numbers currently are Diva, followed by Zebra, Hive, ACE, Satin, Bazille, Presswerk, others in that order, where Hive sells about almost as often as Zebra and a bit more than half of Diva. Hive also sells about twice as often as ACE, so we can safely say it has become our third flagship product.
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
Others did though.fluffy_little_something wrote: I have not said Sylenth1 is easier or more difficult to use.
I disagree, and in fact. I have quite a number of Hive sounds within the demo, that cannot be replicated using Sylenth, due to its limitations.fluffy_little_something wrote: I was referring to the claim someone made that Hive has a much wider sound spectrum. That is nonsense in my view. I can make most any Hive sound in Sylenth1 as well, even if it takes different settings than on Hive.
How can you have hundreds of sounds for Sylenth using the demo? It doesn't save without owning it.fluffy_little_something wrote: I don't have Sylenth1 installed anymore, some parts of it are deactivated in the demo anyway if I remember correctly, I might download it tomorrow. But I have made hundreds of patches on it, so I guess I can say that I am aware which sounds it can make and which it can't make.
And also, you can do the talk but you can't do the walk.
Put your money where your mouth is.
Are you aware of these colloquialisms?
They mean that you can talk a lot about what you can do, but you can't produce the evidence to back those words up.
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
I used to have it and use it a lot, but I sold it. That simple...mcnoone wrote:Others did though.fluffy_little_something wrote: I have not said Sylenth1 is easier or more difficult to use.I disagree, and in fact. I have quite a number of Hive sounds within the demo, that cannot be replicated using Sylenth, due to its limitations.fluffy_little_something wrote: I was referring to the claim someone made that Hive has a much wider sound spectrum. That is nonsense in my view. I can make most any Hive sound in Sylenth1 as well, even if it takes different settings than on Hive.How can you have hundreds of sounds for Sylenth using the demo? It doesn't save without owning it.fluffy_little_something wrote: I don't have Sylenth1 installed anymore, some parts of it are deactivated in the demo anyway if I remember correctly, I might download it tomorrow. But I have made hundreds of patches on it, so I guess I can say that I am aware which sounds it can make and which it can't make.
And also, you can do the talk but you can't do the walk.
Put your money where your mouth is.
Are you aware of these colloquialisms?
They mean that you can talk a lot about what you can do, but you can't produce the evidence to back those words up.
Will download the demo tomorrow...
- Banned
- 6129 posts since 9 Oct, 2007 from an inharmonious society
It's useless, as the demo is limited, and can't save. We need to verify the actual preset.fluffy_little_something wrote:I used to have it and use it a lot, but I sold it. That simple...mcnoone wrote:Others did though.fluffy_little_something wrote: I have not said Sylenth1 is easier or more difficult to use.I disagree, and in fact. I have quite a number of Hive sounds within the demo, that cannot be replicated using Sylenth, due to its limitations.fluffy_little_something wrote: I was referring to the claim someone made that Hive has a much wider sound spectrum. That is nonsense in my view. I can make most any Hive sound in Sylenth1 as well, even if it takes different settings than on Hive.How can you have hundreds of sounds for Sylenth using the demo? It doesn't save without owning it.fluffy_little_something wrote: I don't have Sylenth1 installed anymore, some parts of it are deactivated in the demo anyway if I remember correctly, I might download it tomorrow. But I have made hundreds of patches on it, so I guess I can say that I am aware which sounds it can make and which it can't make.
And also, you can do the talk but you can't do the walk.
Put your money where your mouth is.
Are you aware of these colloquialisms?
They mean that you can talk a lot about what you can do, but you can't produce the evidence to back those words up.
Will download the demo tomorrow...
I damn well know that Sylenth is more talk than walk. I've got 128 sounds in the Hive demo, bet Sylenth can't reproduce even a quarter of those sounds.
- KVRAF
- 26933 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
You are right, it says one can't load and save presets in the demo version...mcnoone wrote:It's useless, as the demo is limited, and can't save. We need to verify the actual preset.fluffy_little_something wrote:I used to have it and use it a lot, but I sold it. That simple...mcnoone wrote:Others did though.fluffy_little_something wrote: I have not said Sylenth1 is easier or more difficult to use.I disagree, and in fact. I have quite a number of Hive sounds within the demo, that cannot be replicated using Sylenth, due to its limitations.fluffy_little_something wrote: I was referring to the claim someone made that Hive has a much wider sound spectrum. That is nonsense in my view. I can make most any Hive sound in Sylenth1 as well, even if it takes different settings than on Hive.How can you have hundreds of sounds for Sylenth using the demo? It doesn't save without owning it.fluffy_little_something wrote: I don't have Sylenth1 installed anymore, some parts of it are deactivated in the demo anyway if I remember correctly, I might download it tomorrow. But I have made hundreds of patches on it, so I guess I can say that I am aware which sounds it can make and which it can't make.
And also, you can do the talk but you can't do the walk.
Put your money where your mouth is.
Are you aware of these colloquialisms?
They mean that you can talk a lot about what you can do, but you can't produce the evidence to back those words up.
Will download the demo tomorrow...
I damn well know that Sylenth is more talk than walk. I've got 128 sounds in the Hive demo, bet Sylenth can't reproduce even a quarter of those sounds.
By the way, I also noticed that while you were stressing that you only used one oscillator, you had set it to 2 waves
You had used pulse, which of course one would have to construct using two oscillators in Sylenth1.
