New DMG Audio Limiter - Limitless!
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 2547 posts since 15 Jan, 2013 from L'Écosse
I have this, but it's pretty far behind the list you had in the other thread. I think your money would be better spent on their Inflator! THAT I cannot live without.dman2014 wrote:What about the Sonnox Oxford Limiter?
-
Hermetech Mastering Hermetech Mastering https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7418
- KVRAF
- 1619 posts since 30 May, 2003 from Milan, Italy
All DMG plugs have been updated recently
-
- KVRAF
- 4720 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
Yeah - the latest Limitless has a new option in the Advanced section of the Setup menu: "Inter-Sample Peaks: Use ITU filter".
But I can't find any info on what exactly it does. Is it just regular oversampling to catch ISPs?
But I can't find any info on what exactly it does. Is it just regular oversampling to catch ISPs?
-
- KVRAF
- 4720 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
I was wondering about the High Pass Filter in Limitless.
So I checked the manual and it's described as "a regular minimum phase coincident-pole design". So it's minimum phase.
Wouldn't it therefore be more ideal to disable the HPF in Limitless and instead use an instance of Pro-Q2 before LImitless with a 'Natural Phase' HPF?
I guess my qustion is... Limitless HPF vs Pro-Q2 HPF? Is minimum phase most ideal for low end cuts?
Does anyone know if the Limitless HPF is applied at the input or output?
So I checked the manual and it's described as "a regular minimum phase coincident-pole design". So it's minimum phase.
Wouldn't it therefore be more ideal to disable the HPF in Limitless and instead use an instance of Pro-Q2 before LImitless with a 'Natural Phase' HPF?
I guess my qustion is... Limitless HPF vs Pro-Q2 HPF? Is minimum phase most ideal for low end cuts?
Does anyone know if the Limitless HPF is applied at the input or output?
- KVRian
- 715 posts since 3 May, 2007 from UK
It is there primarily as a DC offset remover, so it is first.
If it were last, it would redistribute peaks and cause all kinds of issues with the post limited waveform and ISPs etc.
Cheers
Scorb
Edit: p.s. Minimum phase for low cuts always. Pro-q natural phase has pre ringing, so is anything but natural ironically!
If it were last, it would redistribute peaks and cause all kinds of issues with the post limited waveform and ISPs etc.
Cheers
Scorb
Edit: p.s. Minimum phase for low cuts always. Pro-q natural phase has pre ringing, so is anything but natural ironically!
I once thought I had mono for an entire year. It turned out I was just really bored...
-
- KVRAF
- 4720 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
Thanks! But what of the phase shift?djscorb wrote:It is there primarily as a DC offset remover, so it is first.
If it were last, it would redistribute peaks and cause all kinds of issues with the post limited waveform and ISPs etc.
Cheers
Scorb
Edit: p.s. Minimum phase for low cuts always. Pro-q natural phase has pre ringing, so is anything but natural ironically!
-
- KVRAF
- 4720 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
DMG replied - the HPF is between the clipper and the limiter. Makes sense!
-
Hermetech Mastering Hermetech Mastering https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7418
- KVRAF
- 1619 posts since 30 May, 2003 from Milan, Italy
You usually want to use a minimum phase filter for high pass filtering, because anything other than that will sound bad. No real technical idea why, but that's just my experience. I never use the HPF in Limitless because if I apply a HPF at all in mastering, it's either before the analogue chain (with Slick EQ M), or at the end of the analogue chain (Dangerous Bax EQ) right before the ADC. Not to mention all the transformers completely remove any DC anyway.
-
Hermetech Mastering Hermetech Mastering https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=7418
- KVRAF
- 1619 posts since 30 May, 2003 from Milan, Italy
But yeah, Dave really needs to get some info out there on all the new tweaks/features, or update the manual etc. The ITU filter goes CRAZY amounts of GR when activated, what would normally be around 5-6dB GR can be as much as 20dB with the ITU filter activated, also takes more CPU, so I never use it.
-
- KVRAF
- 4720 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
Yeah I'm finding this aswell. I had it activated and I was scratching my head all day today trying to find the source of some nasty clipping sounds (though not actual peaking) that was happening in this track. The mix is sounding amazing except for just a couple of spots where this weird, nasty click happens on just a couple of transients. I checked Limitless and it didn't look like the cause because backing off the Threshold etc didn't fix it. After an exhaustive search I found myself back rummaging around in Limitless and lo and behold the ugly click disappeared as soon as I disabled the ITU. Hmmmmmm why did I leave that onHermetech Mastering wrote:But yeah, Dave really needs to get some info out there on all the new tweaks/features, or update the manual etc. The ITU filter goes CRAZY amounts of GR when activated, what would normally be around 5-6dB GR can be as much as 20dB with the ITU filter activated, also takes more CPU, so I never use it.
-
- KVRist
- 461 posts since 31 Dec, 2010 from Perth
I can confirm what you guys are reporting about the ITU filter.
Unusable at present, unless there is something we don't know - that an updated manual might tell us.
I've emailed Dave.
Unusable at present, unless there is something we don't know - that an updated manual might tell us.
I've emailed Dave.
Latest Album :: https://beatworld1.bandcamp.com/album/well-be-right
-
- KVRAF
- 4720 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
You can have a ceiling of -0.20db and with the ITU filter engaged you literally get a file true peaking at -0.20 or -0.19. So what the ITU filter does do is prevents ISPs very, very effectively - unfortunately with some trade-off artifacts of its own if pushed, which is a shame. Might be great on softer material? But then you probably wouldn't use heavy limiting anyway.Beatworld wrote:I can confirm what you guys are reporting about the ITU filter.
Unusable at present, unless there is something we don't know - that an updated manual might tell us.
I've emailed Dave.
In my testing this weekend I've now disabled the ITU and it's cleaned this track up a bit, but now ISPs are getting through when I export to MP3. Hmmmm - how to avoid? Don't want to use the clipper so might just have to lower the ceiling onlyfor the MP3 versions. The 24-bit master is fine though.
Is there a Wave-to-MP3 convertor that catches ISPs?
