KVR Audio

Robmobius · Post by **Robmobius** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 4:58 pm

Fleer wrote:Not CPU-hungry over here.

That's what I thought...

Richard deHove · Post by **Richard deHove** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:06 pm

Much lower CPU than Aether here. Very easy to tweak the flavor. Loving it so far.

woodsdenis · Post by **woodsdenis** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:22 pm

Not a CPU hog at all.

zentatonic · Post by **zentatonic** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 6:49 pm

Fleer wrote:Pretty creative if you ask me. Quite interesting EQ-on-Decay. Not CPU-hungry over here. Already doing wonders on vocals. Between FabFilter Pro-R and Zynaptiq Adaptiverb I'm set.

Seconded - these two are king of the mountain for me, too.

SteveWZ · Post by **SteveWZ** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:30 pm

woodsdenis wrote:Not a CPU hog at all.

Just did some mixing with multiple instances of PRO-R and the CPU cycles were minimal.

I will post a video soon.

e@rs · Post by **e@rs** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:38 pm

In my defense: I never said it's a CPU hog (like Aether or B2), I just said I have solid verbs that use way less CPU.

incubus · Post by **incubus** » Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:15 pm

e@rs wrote:In my defense: I never said it's a CPU hog (like Aether or B2), I just said I have solid verbs that use way less CPU.

That's not the kvr way

But could you please list the ones that are better? I'm guessing maybe valhalla?

MogwaiBoy · Post by **MogwaiBoy** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 6:01 am

Just logged into my account as I was curious to see my "Personal Upgrade offer"... wow - 40% off!

Now I know exactly what I want for Xmas

e@rs · Post by **e@rs** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:14 am

incubus wrote:
e@rs wrote:In my defense: I never said it's a CPU hog (like Aether or B2), I just said I have solid verbs that use way less CPU.
That's not the kvr way

But could you please list the ones that are better? I'm guessing maybe valhalla?

My 'review' is on the previous page at the bottom. With names and stuff.

jens · Post by **jens** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:49 am

Fleer wrote: Between FabFilter Pro-R and Zynaptiq Adaptiverb I'm set.

So I take it henceforth you won't use your Valhallas anymore?

mementus · Post by **mementus** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:44 pm

so is this reverb something really different and better from others around?

Robert Randolph · Post by **Robert Randolph** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:23 pm

mementus wrote:so is this reverb something really different and better from others around?

No.

nordickvr · Post by **nordickvr** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:33 pm

Robert Randolph wrote:
mementus wrote:so is this reverb something really different and better from others around?
No.

Well, may be having a look at this thread (an many others all around the net) for a more balanced perspective would worth it.

Robert Randolph · Post by **Robert Randolph** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:36 pm

nordickvr wrote:
Robert Randolph wrote:
mementus wrote:so is this reverb something really different and better from others around?
No.
Well, may be having a look at this thread (an many others all around the net) for a more balanced perspective would worth it.

I've read this whole thread and the 3 big ones elsewhere, and I've yet to see anyone describe it 'really different and better'.

There's plenty of people that like it for various reasons, including myself, but the answer to the question he asked is no.

Luckily, there's a demo that anyone can download and try. So nobody else's opinions are really necessary.

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:43 pm

I don't know if by different you mean that it has different features, but, as far as sound is concerned, IMO, every reverb sounds different. So, if people like the sound of Pro-R, then it will offer something different for them anyway. Better or worse, that's a point of view.

New Fabfilter teaser (Pro-R Reverb)