XLN RC-20 Retro Color
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 365 posts since 13 Feb, 2015
This looks like it could be an interesting plugin. Coming soon from XLN
http://www.musicradar.com/news/tech/xln ... our-645136
http://www.musicradar.com/news/tech/xln ... our-645136
- KVRist
- 291 posts since 20 Feb, 2014 from München
Yes indeed. Looking forward to try it.
- KVRAF
- 1678 posts since 3 May, 2014
-
- KVRAF
- 2955 posts since 23 Dec, 2002
Let's hope the plugin is more compelling than this demo track.
ere2learn wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y2dwwmOMIQ
-
- KVRAF
- 8536 posts since 5 Aug, 2009
for 80 bucks i dunno... can it do something what SATIN cant do?
DAW FL Studio Audio Interface Focusrite Scarlett 1st Gen 2i2 CPU Intel i7-7700K 4.20 GHz, RAM 32 GB Dual-Channel DDR4 @2400MHz Corsair Vengeance. MB Asus Prime Z270-K, GPU Gainward 1070 GTX GS 8GB NT Be Quiet DP 550W OS Win10 64Bit
- KVRAF
- 13370 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Kingston, Jamaica
And its live
https://www.xlnaudio.com/products/effec ... etro_color
with a video that imho better represents it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnO8dEKVE8E
rsp
https://www.xlnaudio.com/products/effec ... etro_color
with a video that imho better represents it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnO8dEKVE8E
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRian
- 1013 posts since 12 Sep, 2005
Downloading now. Let's hope for a low resource usage, else it's to the trash for me...not room left for anything heavy until I upgrade.
^Nice. 7 - 10% for 3 modules running..now for the sound?
*It's easy to add unwanted tones that hide a bit, so you have to be careful..looking for the positive, haven't come across anything that drastically enhances, yet..I'm sure it's there somewhere
^Well, I tried. I can't find a use for it that I can't do better with speakerphone and reverb. If you don't have speakerphone, then placing this on drums instead would be a good choice.
-
- KVRAF
- 8536 posts since 5 Aug, 2009
guess i have to demo too, i also dont understand this price, U-He Satin is also not cheap but maybe more options? instead of spending 80 bucks i think i will save those for speakerphone and hope to get it for 300 bucks or something.spacekid wrote:Downloading now. Let's hope for a low resource usage, else it's to the trash for me...not room left for anything heavy until I upgrade.
^Nice. 7 - 10% for 3 modules running..now for the sound?
*It's easy to add unwanted tones that hide a bit, so you have to be careful..looking for the positive, haven't come across anything that drastically enhances, yet..I'm sure it's there somewhere
^Well, I tried. I can't find a use for it that I can't do better with speakerphone and reverb. If you don't have speakerphone, then placing this on drums instead would be a good choice.
DAW FL Studio Audio Interface Focusrite Scarlett 1st Gen 2i2 CPU Intel i7-7700K 4.20 GHz, RAM 32 GB Dual-Channel DDR4 @2400MHz Corsair Vengeance. MB Asus Prime Z270-K, GPU Gainward 1070 GTX GS 8GB NT Be Quiet DP 550W OS Win10 64Bit
- KVRAF
- 13370 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Kingston, Jamaica
Whilst I imagine there may be overlap with Satin, I don't think they are designed to serve the same purpose or target markets.
I do think speakerphone is a more appropriate comparison.
I owned speakerphone 1 but never updated to 2. I find that audioease takes wayyyy too long to fix bugs and update their plugins......took quite awhile for them to even go 64 bit. Speakerphone however I do agree is more flexible, although much more expensive, and for those who are anti-ilok (I am not) that may be an issue for them with speakerphone.
I also have two systems, one mac, one pc that I try to be as comparable as possible, and certainly with retro-color I can have two authorisations without having to buy another license, don't think speakerphone allows two authorisation iloks (I could be wrong).
But in the end, yes buy what is more useful for you.
I haven't used speakerphone in ages since I couldn't' justify the update to 2 from 1 (just checked again $149 US), and I have long since moved on to a 64bit Daw system.
ymmv
rsp
I do think speakerphone is a more appropriate comparison.
I owned speakerphone 1 but never updated to 2. I find that audioease takes wayyyy too long to fix bugs and update their plugins......took quite awhile for them to even go 64 bit. Speakerphone however I do agree is more flexible, although much more expensive, and for those who are anti-ilok (I am not) that may be an issue for them with speakerphone.
I also have two systems, one mac, one pc that I try to be as comparable as possible, and certainly with retro-color I can have two authorisations without having to buy another license, don't think speakerphone allows two authorisation iloks (I could be wrong).
But in the end, yes buy what is more useful for you.
I haven't used speakerphone in ages since I couldn't' justify the update to 2 from 1 (just checked again $149 US), and I have long since moved on to a 64bit Daw system.
ymmv
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRian
- 1013 posts since 12 Sep, 2005
I thought, for the longest time, that all iLoks were for one system. Just found out recently, through here, that I could check my virtual account for the limit. Most are 2..izotope is 1 for some reason(for DDLY). Though, they say you can do the secondary license method for that one, which I guess is a standard C/R. Kind of have all that on hold until I get my new systemzvenx wrote:Whilst I imagine there may be overlap with Satin, I don't think they are designed to serve the same purpose or target markets.
I do think speakerphone is a more appropriate comparison.
I owned speakerphone 1 but never updated to 2. I find that audioease takes wayyyy too long to fix bugs and update their plugins......took quite awhile for them to even go 64 bit. Speakerphone however I do agree is more flexible, although much more expensive, and for those who are anti-ilok (I am not) that may be an issue for them with speakerphone.
I also have two systems, one mac, one pc that I try to be as comparable as possible, and certainly with retro-color I can have two authorisations without having to buy another license, don't think speakerphone allows two authorisation iloks (I could be wrong).
But in the end, yes buy what is more useful for you.
I haven't used speakerphone in ages since I couldn't' justify the update to 2 from 1 (just checked again $149 US), and I have long since moved on to a 64bit Daw system.
ymmv
rsp
- KVRAF
- 13370 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Kingston, Jamaica
The developer gets to choose.
Some do: Soundtoys, softube, slate etc
some don't: mcdsp, exponential audio etc.
rsp
Some do: Soundtoys, softube, slate etc
some don't: mcdsp, exponential audio etc.
rsp
spacekid wrote:I thought, for the longest time, that all iLoks were for one system. Just found out recently, through here, that I could check my virtual account for the limit. Most are 2..izotope is 1 for some reason(for DDLY). Though, they say you can do the secondary license method for that one, which I guess is a standard C/R. Kind of have all that on hold until I get my new systemzvenx wrote:Whilst I imagine there may be overlap with Satin, I don't think they are designed to serve the same purpose or target markets.
I do think speakerphone is a more appropriate comparison.
I owned speakerphone 1 but never updated to 2. I find that audioease takes wayyyy too long to fix bugs and update their plugins......took quite awhile for them to even go 64 bit. Speakerphone however I do agree is more flexible, although much more expensive, and for those who are anti-ilok (I am not) that may be an issue for them with speakerphone.
I also have two systems, one mac, one pc that I try to be as comparable as possible, and certainly with retro-color I can have two authorisations without having to buy another license, don't think speakerphone allows two authorisation iloks (I could be wrong).
But in the end, yes buy what is more useful for you.
I haven't used speakerphone in ages since I couldn't' justify the update to 2 from 1 (just checked again $149 US), and I have long since moved on to a 64bit Daw system.
ymmv
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRAF
- 13370 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Kingston, Jamaica
Curious to know in what way?J4R1O wrote:I just remembered that XLN has the most annoying installation procedure ever. Skipped.
It installs itself. W
rsp
sound sculptist
-
rhythmtechnologies rhythmtechnologies https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=177822
- KVRist
- 224 posts since 6 Apr, 2008
Online install process onlyzvenx wrote:Curious to know in what way?J4R1O wrote:I just remembered that XLN has the most annoying installation procedure ever. Skipped.
It installs itself. W
rsp