One Synth Challenge #94: Synth1 (Photonic Wins!)

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Frostline wrote:
wagtunes wrote: Bottom Line: Use some common sense and, if you care, just be honest with this whole thing.

And with that, I'm done.
You know, I really really wish people would stop telling me that in discussions about rules in this competition.

And Wags this is not directed specifically at you as a person or artist, you just happened to say the triggering phrase "common sense" at me this time. :tu:

Use common sense is a completely empty useless answer to someone asking a question. It is a cop-out. I've found it is an answer thrown up when a question is either too hard or too complex to answer completely.

Just because something is common it does not mean it is universal.
It's common for Americans to own pick-up trucks. But that does not mean that every American owns a pick-up truck or even knows how to drive one. Yet you want to answer "just throw it in the back of your pick-up, that's just common sense" when asked how to get a couch across town. That is a sure helpful answer to someone who only owns a bicycle. :bang:
And yes I know there are probably YouTube videos out there showing a person on a bicycle (missing 1 of the 2 wheels) packing 3 couches, 15 people and a cow across town, that is not the point.

So telling me to use common sense is basically telling me to keep wandering around in the dark and if you happen to cross that cliff edge that we refuse to tell you about, the landing (disqualification) will indicate to you where the edge(rule) was.
Only because I am confident I will not be contention for the first prize I have actually desired (the excellent artwork :love: ) I will not rue learning the rules the hard way. :neutral:
Good Lord man. Okay, let me put this another way with a very specific example, which in the end, isn't going to answer your question either.

You're coming up with a track for the OSC. You're trying real hard not to do something that you've done before OR, worse yet, is somebody else's song.

You start off with an innocuous 4 chord progression of Dm - G - C - Am. You start playing a melody around it and half way through you say to yourself, "Damn, that sounds a lot like (insert song name) by (insert group name)"

Now it's not identical. But you know it's close enough that most average people who listen to popular music are going to recognize it.

What do you do?

I know what I would do. I'd go find something else to play.

As I pointed out in the video (if you even bothered to watch it) chord progressions themselves are NOT copywriteable or all these people would be suing each other's asses off. A riff, is not copywriteable in and of itself. But...use the same riff with the same beat and then you start getting into trouble.

So if you did THIS at the beginning of your song.



JUST like that...Yeah, you'd be in a shit load of trouble. Especially if you CONSCIOUSLY do it and don't give a crap that you did it.

Are you going to come up with a riff or a melody or an arpeggio or something that's been done before by somebody on this planet?

Unless you're f**king Mozart, count on it.

But the chances of you putting together a whole song that sounds exactly like somebody else's whole song IF you honestly attempted to write an original song are slim to none. You'd have a better chance of winning the lottery or getting struck by lightning.

Now, you've got a whole catalog of your OWN songs and you decide to take the intro from one, the verse from another, the middle 8 from another, the chorus from another, the ARP from another, the drum beat from another and the outro from another that all just happen to share the same C-Am-F-G main chord structure, well, that's up to you.

The spirit of the rule says you don't do that. You ATTEMPT to clear your mind of everything you've ever done in your life and...wait for it...

WRITE SOMETHING f**king NEW.

I've been writing songs since 1977. That's almost 40 years. If you go to my Soundcloud page you won't find two songs that sound exactly alike. They are all ORIGINAL and DIFFERENT compositions.

You have any idea how f**king hard that is after almost 40 years?

Okay, this is the best answer I or anyone else can give you. If you can't grok what I'm saying from this then there is nothing else I can tell you.

Nobody can teach common sense.

Post

wagtunes wrote:

Now it's not identical. But you know it's close enough that most average people who listen to popular music are going to recognize it.

What do you do?
Hmm, guess that depends on my intent.

I really appreciate you gave my OXDB track the score you did Wags. It was very generous and I was happy to see that you seemed to like it.

But did you skip over the intro?

It kinda has a very close facsimile to a pretty "popular" song. There were some not disapproving comments for the usage. :shrug:

But I think my intent there was pretty clear (common sense, if you like). It was to invoke a mood or feeling in the listener. Perhaps even a bit of humor with the "inspirational" song's theme played in a strident instrumentation. A nod to the theme of my entire piece which was "ain't relationships grand, oh great we are fighting again". Or maybe still just the idea of invoking a 'classical' (as in typical to the relationship) argument.

Even if the listener never perceived what I was trying to use it for I don't believe any listener who recognized the "inspirational" song would feel that I was trying to claim that piece of 'borrowed' melody as my own creation. Expressly because it was so obviously used.

But could it have been considered a 'cover' or unoriginal? (was my personal judgement on the matter incorrect?)

This I did not know. I tried asking a few months ago. Got a vague answer. So decided to stumble around and see where that edge was.

Looks like I didn't go splat this time.

So we will see if I get any closer this month. I could just plummet right off.
wagtunes wrote: As I pointed out in the video (if you even bothered to watch it) chord progressions themselves are NOT copywriteable or all these people would be suing each other's asses off. A riff, is not copywriteable in and of itself. But...use the same riff with the same beat and then you start getting into trouble.
The issue of something being copyrightable or not is of little import to this discussion. No need to wander down the Fair Use Act rabbit hole for debate here I believe. This is about this contest.
And I can, with some degree of confidence say that the person who brought the question up would probably not sue themselves for using their own song. :roll:

wagtunes wrote: Are you going to come up with a riff or a melody or an arpeggio or something that's been done before by somebody on this planet?

Unless you're f**king Mozart, count on it.
Eh, I bet Mozart had a claim or two against him in his time.

wagtunes wrote:
I've been writing songs since 1977. That's almost 40 years. If you go to my Soundcloud page you won't find two songs that sound exactly alike. They are all ORIGINAL and DIFFERENT compositions.

You have any idea how f**king hard that is after almost 40 years?

Okay, this is the best answer I or anyone else can give you. If you can't grok what I'm saying from this then there is nothing else I can tell you.

Nobody can teach common sense.
I'm not sure why you seem to take my comments personal (since listing personal details) when I specifically said my post was not going to be about you specifically. But ok.

Just the other day someone suggested I listen to an artist I had never heard of before.

So I checked them out. I really liked the suggested track so I went looking for about 7-8 more.

Guess what? The songs all sounded basically the same. All were within 16-32 bars of being the same length. By about the 3rd or 4th one I could start pointing when an arp was going to kick in and was right on the money. But they are all also well produced, well received by fans in the genre and were probably very popular in certain circles several years ago.

So what are you trying to imply when saying all your tracks are unique? That it makes them 'better' or it is a more moral way to make music or what exactly? Some people don't think they hit perfection every time so they have multiple goes at making their song 'right' to their ears. Are they inferior?
Yeah strawmanning a bit here but I do wonder your point as it relates to the topic.

I've been writing songs for my own amusement since around 77 as well. I believe that is when the years of piano lessons started. It has grown rather hazy to specific years as the past regresses.
What does that show other than we are both probably on the last half of our mortality?
Win10 x64, Reaper 6.XX x64, i5-3330, 8gb ram, GTX-970, UC-33, Panorama P4, Wharfedale Diamond 8.2 and JVC HA-RX700

Post

Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Now that you've read it a few times, perhaps it's clearer that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest. Once we've understood the meaning of "Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest", we can conclude that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest. This arms us with the knowledge that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest, and you may proceed composing your entry specifically for this contest, instead of using a song not composed specifically for this contest.

Post

I wrote a nice ballad, but the beginning sounded very familiar.
Turned out to be The Long And Winding Road by The Beatles, only with different timing.

Post

Oh and if the rule would be, the song should be composed in the month of the competition I would have a hard time.

Post

.jon wrote:Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Now that you've read it a few times, perhaps it's clearer that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest. Once we've understood the meaning of "Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest", we can conclude that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest. This arms us with the knowledge that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest, and you may proceed composing your entry specifically for this contest, instead of using a song not composed specifically for this contest.
So if I understand you correctly the entry should be composed specifically for this contest.

Post

rghvdberg wrote:
.jon wrote:Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest

Now that you've read it a few times, perhaps it's clearer that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest. Once we've understood the meaning of "Your entry must be composed specifically for this contest", we can conclude that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest. This arms us with the knowledge that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest, and you may proceed composing your entry specifically for this contest, instead of using a song not composed specifically for this contest.
So if I understand you correctly the entry should be composed specifically for this contest.
So my entry must be composed specifically for this contest ? I understand well ? :oops:
12 years old PC running :Reaper;Reason;Dune;Zampler;Kontakr;Reaktor;and many others countless vst :D

Post

Yes, you have correctly interpreted both the letter and the intent of this rule, which is that your entry must be composed specifically for this contest.

Post

I give up.

Post

wagtunes wrote:I give up.
Don't give up.
Just compose a song specifically for this contest.

And do all sound design
And mixing
And mastering

How hard can it be?

Post

rghvdberg wrote:
wagtunes wrote:I give up.
Don't give up.
Just compose a song specifically for this contest.

And do all sound design
And mixing
And mastering

How hard can it be?
Apparently for some, very.

Post

hahaha u guys strat WWIII from simple question suggestion :)ok it must be brand new ,original composition and if by accident sounds like something else it is coincident :)believe me or not i start my music hobby and practice after an amateur keyboardist answer to my question how u know what keys to pres to play a melody and become music with 'ALL MUSIC IS IMAGINATION'

Post

WWIII lol, yeah you're damn right VEL...

I delete much stuff cos' I say to myself, that one was writteh before or it sounds like... Better make something different, but ther's also Sussudio inspired by 1999 (Collins said that, it's not a secret) and nothing happend.

It's always a compliment if ppl to coverish actions. ;)

Post

I wish I had found this corner of KVR sooner. I had so much fun with this. I apparently can't be bothered to come up with a title though.

https://soundcloud.com/slautir/slautir-osc94

DAW: FLStudio
14 x Synth1
1 x Fruity Compressor

Not really a plugin, but I also used the 3-band channel EQs for the 9 channels

Post

Many too many good entries... I'll get last place! lol

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”