KVR Audio

Fleer · Post by **Fleer** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:16 am

If anyone's still looking for LusH-101, I read that JRRshop has some available for $50.

fischkopf · Post by **fischkopf** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 2:31 am

Fleer wrote:If anyone's still looking for LusH-101, I read that JRRshop has some available for $50.

That's like almost too cheap for such a great synth.

incubus · Post by **incubus** » Tue Dec 27, 2016 7:19 am

Still confused. With MC on and x64 system, can't understand the issue. Oh well, just glad I got it and at a great price!

DJ Warmonger · Post by **DJ Warmonger** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 5:13 am

With my new Ryzen build I suddenly felt respect for LuSH

. My CPU can swallow any DSP task with no visible effort... however, when I launched layered polyphonic patch at 88200, buffer usage instatnly hit 136%

. Luckily LuSH allows multithreading - it created 16 threads, which now use less than 10% of a buffer. So it's optimized for 8 cores and 16 thread, at least.

incubus · Post by **incubus** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 5:30 am

That's cool. What did you have before?

DJ Warmonger · Post by **DJ Warmonger** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 5:43 am

Suprisingly I didn't notice significant CPU usage with my old Xeon X3450, but on my previous system I ran out of RAM as soon as there were 10 instances of LuSH in total

That was mostly sample-based project as far as I remember.

Also, I was running at 44110 back then and now I use 88200. It seems that it doesn't come for free with LuSH.

incubus · Post by **incubus** » Mon Apr 03, 2017 5:49 am

It's pretty cpu intensive even with the mulitcore. But I can run many instances on my 4770k, but I only do 44.1k (got tired of all the plug compatibility issues with other sample rates)

LuSH-101