Yes. If some patches are too heavy, especially with a 16 voices polyphony, I'd recommand 1rst reducing the release, when it's possible ( I've seen quite a lot of patches where the VCA EV release was very short, and the filter EV(s) release time were too high, in a useless way). And/Or taming, as much as possible, the number of unison voices. As well as reducing the polyphony (as 16 notes polyphony is not always required).exmatproton wrote:16 voices uses about 50% CPU here (core i7 4970K @ 4,8 GHz). That is quite hefty. I am not complaining though. I love the 'almost' no compromise, best quality attitude. I wish more synth dev's would do this. This thing sounds amazing!Lotuzia wrote:PolyKB III will use a similar CPU charge to PolyKB II for identical patches. However, using the second filter for some patches will add a CPU charge similar to using the same patch with unison set to factor 2 ( I'll take the opportunity to remind that PolyKB II & III have True Unison modes, ie real additional voices are generated, and you can thoroughly tweak individually these voices using the various Per Voice modulators, allowing precise and neverseen control over them)Numanoid wrote:The iLOK registration went pretty trouble free for me, I redeemed the licence.
To register the PolyKB III license on my iLOK I needed first to surrender the PolyKB II license I already had on it.
When that was done I registered both PolyKB II and III to the iLOK. Both products works afterwards.
The way it looks in iLOK manager:PolyKB III sounds mighty fine, but I wonder if it uses a bit more CPU than PolyKB II ?PolyKB II & III (2) [Locked group]
-PolyKB III [Product]
-polyKB [Product]
Also, while beeing at least totally on pair with any other analog emulations quality wise, it uses less cpu than some other synths. And finally, to achieve this, the PolyKB always run in Supreme Mode : There are no 'low quality' modes in it.
My personal benchmark, for what its worth, is for a single Bass or Lead patch with not too high release 3% cpu charge on my antique Q9550 @ 2.8 Hrz ( 6 years old I think), wich I think is not lite by any way, but not very high as well.
The best thing though, I agree, is probably to demo the PolyKB III with the demo version. This way : No surprises.
