Yeah I agree wholeheartedly with allowing bans without warning if one deserves it. But then again, as I mentioned many many times is (it's quite amazing actually, how dense you guys are, that you ignore my point completely and resort to rumors like saying I was aggressive and called names LOL, is that really what you have to resort to, to get your point across?); I got banned for pointing out a severe windows 10 bug. I will stop arguing with you clowns (first pejorative I've used BTW, now that I see your levels' of coherence) now who would rather fanboy and circlejerk against me. I imagine this is what a period feels like.chk071 wrote:Show me the rule that says that you have to be warned once.shonoob wrote:Hahaha yeah sure man. Whatever floats your boat, the only reason I'm 'whining' (shining light for others), is because I wasn't warned once.Suloo wrote:it's just the same thing over and over. People like shonoob were breaking the rules, calling people names, behaved aggressively, been warned, didn't learn, got banned, started whining and still do.
Like in a kindergarten..
Instead I will spend my time continuing learning and making music on Ableton, the much superior DAW at the moment. Have fun spending all of your time on a music forum though, with your thousands of posts, and your melodramatic hand-wringing instead of actually making anything relatively interesting, I bet.
