Difficult chord progession

[Nextom]

I'm trying to put in a rather unusual chord-progression. (It's from this piece , and the progression has been analyzed not by me, but by someone with a Ph.d. in Music, so it should be correct). This guy wrote up the progression (in G minor) as Am7/G - Cm7 - Cm7/G - Am7/G. In the piano roll, it looks like this:

Now, my problem comes, when I try to put that into Rapid Composer. When I put in the chords via their chord names, they come out differently from the original. When I put them in via keyboard RC gives them rather funny names: . RC also doesn't seem to find a rule, under which they all fit in.

My question is now, how to deal with that. Have I just picked that one "impossible" progression, that's just too much to handle for RC? Should I give up and forget about it or is there another way?

[tonedef71]

I'm trying to put in a rather unusual chord-progression. (It's from this piece , and the progression has been analyzed not by me, but by someone with a Ph.d. in Music, so it should be correct). This guy wrote up the progression (in G minor) as Am7/G - Cm7 - Cm7/G - Am7/G. In the piano roll, it looks like this:

The first, third, and fourth chords of that chord progression look valid. However, that second chord as it appears in the piano roll (Bb-C-D-G) might actually be one of the following:

* A#6/9
* C9sus2/A#
* D11#5sus4/A#
* Gm/A# add(4)

Taken from here: http://www.scales-chords.com/chord-name ... &bass=A%23

[musicdevelopments]

The second chord on the piano roll is a Gmadd4 (which is just one name for these notes).
See the differences between that chord and the inverted Cm7:



BTW I love that BoC song...

[nexussynth]

i love BoC unusual progressions too. maybe somebody could work up a small library of them for RC?