So, will you, or have you bought Sylenth1?
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
Sylenth1's osc section is more similar to the Minimoog than the Virus, judging from the user interfaces on Google Image search.
-
- KVRAF
- 9145 posts since 7 Oct, 2005
Don't start generations war!fluffy_little_something wrote:I am at least middle-aged and happy about it because decades ago I experienced much better music than todayNobody can take that away from me, except Alzheimer's
![]()
And mediocre? Can't be more mediocre than young people today...
Our days weren't perfect either! We missed many things
Using: Cubase Pro 15, Reason 13, Tascam US-4x4HR, MODX6, DM12D, LaunchKey 49, Yamaha guitar(Pacifica 612v) and bass (BB234) and some virtual instruments and synths.
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
Yes, in Virus "classic oscillator" you don't have a waveform selector, instead of that you can morph between sine, square and pulse with PWM control. Also you don't have per osc unison, only a global one and a dedicated hypersaw oscillator. Anyway, Sylenth is still cabable of approximating basic VA sounds from Virus more or less close.fluffy_little_something wrote:Sylenth1's osc section is more similar to the Minimoog than the Virus, judging from the user interfaces on Google Image search.
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
fluffy_little_something fluffy_little_something https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=281847
- Banned
- 12880 posts since 5 Jun, 2012
- It wasn't me who brought that upEnGee wrote:Don't start generations war!
Our days weren't perfect either! We missed many thingsSo, it is always you gain something and lose something. Personally I prefer the present with its advancements in technologies
- Not perfect, but better in my view. I sure would prefer living in the 80's again...
- KVRAF
- 2110 posts since 5 Oct, 2015 from Swedish / Living in Hong Kong
I would love to have had todays technology back in the 80's. Software is way cheaper than all the hardware I bought back in the day and it can do much more as well. Having said that, I can also feel the nostalgic about the old hardware synths I used to have, and in those days I really learned every tiny detail of each synth. These days with soft synth I can't really say I take my time to learn every tiny detail. I have too many soft synths 
Win 10 -64bit, CPU i7-7700K, 32Gb, Focusrite 2i2, FL-studio 20, Studio One 4, Reason 10
-
do_androids_dream do_androids_dream https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=164034
- KVRAF
- 2908 posts since 26 Oct, 2007 from Kent, UK
I will one day. I still think it's the best sounding softsynth ever made.
- KVRAF
- 4589 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Warsaw
I have one and use it a lot. Probably wouldn't buy it today as there are many alternatives and Sylenth1 doesn't do anything special or unique. Still, thousands of artists made their tracks with it, so why would we need anything more?
Certainly it's a great learning synth I'd recommed to anyone.
Certainly it's a great learning synth I'd recommed to anyone.
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
-
- KVRist
- 259 posts since 16 Jun, 2015
If synth programming is your raison d'etre then Sylenth1 doesn't make a lot of sense. But from the perspective of finishing music, it's excellent, contingent on the type of music you're talking about. Other synths in this category include Nexus and Omnisphere, neither of which I like, but both are quite good at getting you to a high quality finished product of a certain sort. Horses for courses.
You can bitch and moan about the "lack of originality, maaan" or whatever, but if your composition chops are excellent, then merely adequate sound design is all you need to produce great music. Bach was incredibly prolific and produced some of the objectively greatest music ever (yes, this is objective, the inevitable Internet sophistry against such an intuitively obvious point is completely irrelevant and a little sad tbqh) -- he spent years writing an amazing cantata a week, the quality of his work did not suffer because he didn't build an entirely new organ for each piece.
Sylenth1 is homologous to that organ, so to speak. It's an excellent tool for any job which requires classic synth sounds. If you like to work with presets, they are as plentiful as raindrops in April. If you prefer to program from scratch, its clever ergonomics and wise limitations make producing great and usable sounds as easy as bumper bowling. It is highly CPU efficient, hence a good team player in a project, yet its sound quality ranges from good to excellent.
Real, beautiful music will always outlast weird, degenerate noise, despite the wailing and teeth gnashing of the usual neotenous neomaniacs; and Sylenth1 is a beautiful instrument. The puny wrath of a hundred mad nerds on KVR will never change that.
You can bitch and moan about the "lack of originality, maaan" or whatever, but if your composition chops are excellent, then merely adequate sound design is all you need to produce great music. Bach was incredibly prolific and produced some of the objectively greatest music ever (yes, this is objective, the inevitable Internet sophistry against such an intuitively obvious point is completely irrelevant and a little sad tbqh) -- he spent years writing an amazing cantata a week, the quality of his work did not suffer because he didn't build an entirely new organ for each piece.
Sylenth1 is homologous to that organ, so to speak. It's an excellent tool for any job which requires classic synth sounds. If you like to work with presets, they are as plentiful as raindrops in April. If you prefer to program from scratch, its clever ergonomics and wise limitations make producing great and usable sounds as easy as bumper bowling. It is highly CPU efficient, hence a good team player in a project, yet its sound quality ranges from good to excellent.
Real, beautiful music will always outlast weird, degenerate noise, despite the wailing and teeth gnashing of the usual neotenous neomaniacs; and Sylenth1 is a beautiful instrument. The puny wrath of a hundred mad nerds on KVR will never change that.
Makin' Music Great Again 
- KVRAF
- 2147 posts since 30 Oct, 2006 from Australia, NSW
Yes after along time i just recently purchased with the new update out and its a most capable and great sounding instrument
http://www.voltagedisciple.com
Patches for PHASEPLANT ACE,PREDATOR, SYNPLANT, SUB BOOM BASS2,PUNCH , PUNCH BD
AALTO,CIRCLE,BLADE and V-Haus Card For Tiptop Audio ONE Module
https://soundcloud.com/somerville-1i
Patches for PHASEPLANT ACE,PREDATOR, SYNPLANT, SUB BOOM BASS2,PUNCH , PUNCH BD
AALTO,CIRCLE,BLADE and V-Haus Card For Tiptop Audio ONE Module
https://soundcloud.com/somerville-1i
-
- KVRer
- 8 posts since 11 Jun, 2017
Just a heads up for anyone on the fence. LennarDigital is now offering a Serum style rent to own plan. No interest and it's yours when it's paid off, you can suspend/resume at will, etc. I went ahead and pulled the trigger. Not sure what their activation/check-in scheme is yet but I did get a license key email very quickly. We'll see how it goes, eh?
https://www.lennardigital.com/store/
https://www.lennardigital.com/store/
-
- KVRAF
- 5271 posts since 2 Jul, 2005
I've checked it out a few times over the years. It didn't do much for me. If I needed lots of dance presets I'd buy it. I don't though. Honestly I never quite understood the big deal with it.
Don't F**K with Mr. Zero.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 35675 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Frankly, i didn't either. Until i gave it a good go, after i bought it used, and realized how punchy it sounds, and how pleasant the unison sound is. Especially, it doesn't phase a lot (or at all) with those, which most other synths do. It also gets VERY wide, and has a nice drive by default. I don't think it excels at something specifically (although it surely does the nicest supersaws of them all, if that's your thing), but is rather the often quoted sum of its parts. Don't like the fx so much though.Ah_Dziz wrote:I've checked it out a few times over the years. It didn't do much for me. If I needed lots of dance presets I'd buy it. I don't though. Honestly I never quite understood the big deal with it.
