Well, in all the other DAWs I have, the multi-process (threads/cores) options is enabled in Cubase, Live, FL Studio and Reaper. Reaper is by default. In all these DAWs, enabling the multi-thread/core in Diva gives a better CPU usage.aMUSEd wrote:That's weird, I thought it was generally recommended not to enable multicore features in plugins when the DAW is handling that because sometimes they can clash? Both NI and u-he advise turning it off in such cases, or at least provide the option to do so (some DAWS do seem to cope with it better than others but that may be more to do with limitations in how they handle multicore - either way this isn't entirely unexpected behaviour)EnGee wrote:Of course it shouldn't behave like I mentioned. That was also the case before the update to v3.5. Enabling the multi-core feature in the VSTi has a negative effect on the CPU usage, so something is wrong with S1 in Windows 10 (at least in my system! As non one is confirming what I have!!). I have all other DAWs behaving as it should be (lower CPU when enabling multi-thread or multi-core in the Vsti).
S1 is the only one DAW I have that enabling the multi-thread/core in Diva gives bad CPU usage. I don't know what is the reason exactly nor I pretend I know why! I'm just observing what is there and write it here! I leave the analysis for those who know why (not by guessing, but by knowing facts).
Now, it has been for years a difference in stability and performance between Windows and Mac regarding Studio One. I have no idea about OS X, but in Windows, this is what I'm seeing.
For now, if I want to use Studio One, I need to disable the multi-thing in the VSTi. If I want to use another DAW, then I enable it. I can't find better solution than that for now!
OT: Reaper is soooooooooooo tempting to switch to! Damn! This is miles ahead of other DAWs in CPU usage and performance in general! Diva looks like a nice friendly and lovely synth not a monster gives you horror when you look at CPU measure in other DAWs!