SONAR 4 Surround....
-
christianmusicmaker christianmusicmaker https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12152
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1670 posts since 1 Feb, 2004 from UK
What is going on here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
These are rumours of course but if the part about Live 4's audio warp engine being implemented into SX3 is true then it would be a massive answer to Live 4.
I think the Steinberg Remix product *was* a cut down version of Live anyway so it may be true...we will see in about a week for sure!
Steinberg remix
The SX3 rumour...
SX3?
These are rumours of course but if the part about Live 4's audio warp engine being implemented into SX3 is true then it would be a massive answer to Live 4.
I think the Steinberg Remix product *was* a cut down version of Live anyway so it may be true...we will see in about a week for sure!
Steinberg remix
The SX3 rumour...
SX3?
-
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Boston, Mass
Sonar 4 + Live 4 > SX3?
discuss

discuss
If it sounds good it is good.
- KVRAF
- 2813 posts since 14 Feb, 2001 from What do you care? :)
It's possible...EricRichmond wrote:Sonar 4 + Live 4 > SX3?
discuss![]()
![]()
![]()
There have been rumors of strategic alliances between Steinberg and other mfrs. most notably and obviously with Yamaha.
Seems to be a pattern here...
Steinberg/Yamaha
Cakewalk/Roland
Digidesign/MAudio (aka Avid)
Actually it seems to me it would make more sense for Ableton to buddy up with the Propellerheads...
-
christianmusicmaker christianmusicmaker https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12152
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1670 posts since 1 Feb, 2004 from UK
I know EricEricRichmond wrote:Sonar 4 + Live 4 > SX3?
discuss![]()
![]()
![]()
If it is true about Live's audio warp feature in SX3 then it would be some feature. I would personally still prefer Sonar 4 if I had to choose between Cubase SX3 and S4 Producer.As I already have Live 3.
- KVRAF
- 25016 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
Could you please explain what you're missing about the current vst-support?3mph wrote: I was hoping for full vst-support
-
- KVRAF
- 2875 posts since 28 Jan, 2004 from Da Nang, Vietnam
The vst wrapper is still flaky in some circumstances.jens wrote:Could you please explain what you're missing about the current vst-support?3mph wrote: I was hoping for full vst-support
-
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Boston, Mass
christianmusicmaker
I'm just messing around,
I actually use Live4 + Sonar3 tandem (soon to be Live4 + Sonar 4) and love it. looks like it will only get better!!
I'm just messing around,
I actually use Live4 + Sonar3 tandem (soon to be Live4 + Sonar 4) and love it. looks like it will only get better!!
If it sounds good it is good.
-
- KVRian
- 1045 posts since 23 Jul, 2001 from Jersey Is Where America's At
Though I haven't found the adapter flaky in quite some time as far as compatibility with VST plug-ins, Sonar not including built in VST support means that VST effects that can sync to tempo will not work unless configured as a DXi (not a big deal) if at all (a very big deal, as plug-ins like the Kjaerhus Audio modulation effects still do not sync). Also we're missing midi output support for VST/VSTi plug-ins (which I was hoping against hope would be in this release). Anyway aside from this I'm quite impressed with this upgrade and will be kicking my Sonar 2.2XL up a few notches. Don't need the surround stuff (which appears to be one of the biggest things), but the group editing will certainly come in handy as well as the Pow-R dither and Sonar 3PE's bussing as well as the other new features. Can't see how some people don't think this is a big update though...I'm familiar enough with Sonar 3PE from using it on friend's systems to know this is quite the big update.jens wrote:
3mph wrote:
I was hoping for full vst-support
Could you please explain what you're missing about the current vst-support?
The vst wrapper is still flaky in some circumstances.
I'm sorry this post wasn't about techno.
-
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Boston, Mass
yeah! hopefully the next vst->dx adapter release will add that midi stuff so things like supatrigga will work!
you can't turn the Kjaerhus Audio stuff into DXis? why not?
you can't turn the Kjaerhus Audio stuff into DXis? why not?
If it sounds good it is good.
-
- KVRAF
- 2097 posts since 8 Feb, 2003 from Nearish Detroit, MI
Okay, here's what I'm most excited about:
"Bus-able Audio Metronome"
YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Bus-able Audio Metronome"
YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GLHF! (Gandalf Lives, Hobbits Forever!)
-
christianmusicmaker christianmusicmaker https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=12152
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1670 posts since 1 Feb, 2004 from UK
"I'm just messing around"EricRichmond wrote:christianmusicmaker
I'm just messing around,
I actually use Live4 + Sonar3 tandem (soon to be Live4 + Sonar 4) and love it. looks like it will only get better!!
Yeah I know
I suppose if you pay more then the you get swamped with FX and other features..what an upgrade for Sonar!
-
- KVRist
- 189 posts since 29 Jan, 2003 from location, location, location...
torhan wrote:I have a 20-40% understanding of it.EricRichmond wrote:Configurable Pan law (six stereo panning laws supported)
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anyone who frequents the cakewalk forums will understand this LOL!![]()
-
- KVRist
- 189 posts since 29 Jan, 2003 from location, location, location...
Actually I would say there are more main features than the one you mention. Freeze, comping, video, etc. And Sonar DOES have full VST support IMO. Also there ARE more dithering options.3mph wrote:I'm sorry, but I can't get exited by this. Optimized audio engine and the trackfolders are the main new features, but is that worth a new realease? It looks more like an update to me..
Oh, the pan-laws, yes.. that only concerns those artist that "port" their project to other DAW-enviroments.
I was hoping for full vst-support, better rewire-handling, more flexible console that could be custom configured to software/hardware effects (studioware is nice, but it's still like a program-inside-a-program), more dithering options, improved timing, more audio-routing facilities etc. etc. I'll stick to 3PE untill Cakewalk presents me to something worth the money for the upgrade. I'm sure they will in a very short while
Sorry, I was a little late to the party here. Didn't mean to beat a dead horse
-
- KVRist
- 189 posts since 29 Jan, 2003 from location, location, location...
Yeah....this is truly revoltuionary. Surround vocoders, surround ohmforce delay, surround multiband...surround-anything...mmmmm....me likey.billybk1 wrote:What's this new feature, SurroundBridge... to easily use stereo plug-ins in a multichannel environment It appears to be trademarked too, mmm...using regular stereo audio plugins in 5.1 & 7.1 Surround.
Swheet!