LOL!VariKusBrainZ wrote:Im going to buy Cubase in the hope it can be used as a word processor
But, yeah, I have no FOMO with this and that's the only reason for the silly retail price.
LOL!VariKusBrainZ wrote:Im going to buy Cubase in the hope it can be used as a word processor
So, yes, the reason for calling it out as a bad reverb isn't so much to say "look how bad it is", rather, it's "geez, who doesn't have reverb that sounds this bad already?" Beyond that, there is an expectation that anything priced at hundreds of dollars is going to be competitive with other similar products priced at hundreds of dollars.Armagibbon wrote: My opinion? Not like it matters over here... but I got no place for it. Already got a buncha verb plugs I like. Already got plugs that do this kinda modulation too and I'm good with them already. What's your take on it? You try doing that kinda thing with what you got already?
Nice try. I care about chatting about technology and that includes talking about bad products as well as good. However, make no mistake about it, I wasn't suckered into giving up a coffee or two for this thing. I'm never surprised when people buy weak products, especially weak flashy products, they've been doing that since time began.Russell Grand wrote:To answer your (rhetorical) "who cares": many people here obviously care as Oracle is getting plenty of love along with the hate. I'd also be inclined to say that you care, considering how much time you have spent in this thread.
Except that you didn't. You're projecting meaning onto my words that aren't there. Here's the dictionary definition for you.Russell Grand wrote:Simply calling it what it is.
So now, read that in context, "as a reverb, who cares." Don't confuse yourself in an effort to make yourself feel better for buying weak products. I don't think that this is an "important" reverb and I'm not worried about "not getting it." My choice to talk shit about it doesn't reflect an inner desire to purchase it. That kind of interpretation is something that your mom probably tried on you to manipulate you into doing things her way, only neither of you were smart enough to realize that it's nonsense on its face.used for saying that you do not think something is important and that you are not worried about it
Leaving the ridiculous retail price aside, are there examples of paid reverbs in the ballpark of $13 that perform better? Notwithstanding the fact that I feel that OrilRiver is a stronger reverb and it's free. But if someone was looking for a good paid reverb of comparable price, $13, what would you recommend? Or would you submit there is likely nothing but weak products at that price point? Also, I agree that Oracle is a weak product for $13, and it's an insanely inadequate product for the retail price.ghettosynth wrote:Except that you didn't. Your projecting meaning onto my words that aren't there. Here's the dictionary definition for you.Russell Grand wrote:Simply calling it what it is.
So now, read that in context, "as a reverb, who cares." Don't confuse yourself in an effort to make yourself feel better for buying weak products. I don't think that this is an "important" reverb and I'm not worried about "not getting it." My choice to talk shit about it doesn't reflect an inner desire to purchase it. That kind of interpretation is something that your mom probably tried on you to manipulate you into doing things her way only neither of you were smart enough to realize that it's nonsense on its face.used for saying that you do not think something is important and that you are not worried about it
Yes! Either of Toneboosters' reverbs are better value. Either the latest version or the one that comes with Track Essentials. The Track Essentials reverb comes with other great tools for $20 so you can't really separate the price of the reverb, but, seriously, it's better value all the way around. Given that this reverb is on sale it's fair to compare it to other reverbs on sale. Abbey Road Plates and H-Reverb are certainly "better", and I don't really like H-Reverb, in fact, I've turned it down twice now at $29. There's a new reverb from a smaller dev that was posted a few days ago, someone will link it, I can't recall, that sounds better to me and they clearly put more effort into the reverb algorithms than SoundSpot did. I plan to demo that before the intro period is over. I think that I mentioned Dreamscape which is an, unfortunately, 32-bit only reverb earlier in this thread. It is fun as an experimental reverb, but not so good at convincing spaces. I paid about $5 for that on sale and I think that it's in the same ballpark normally.BRBWaffles wrote: Leaving the ridiculous retail price aside, are there examples of paid reverbs in the ballpark of $13 that perform better? Notwithstanding the fact that I feel that OrilRiver is a stronger reverb and it's free. But if someone was looking for a good paid reverb of comparable price, $13, what would you recommend? Or would you submit there is likely nothing but weak products at that price point? Also, I agree that Oracle is a weak product for $13, and it's an insanely inadequate product for the retail price.
I acknowledge that it isn't a $13 product, but I'm speaking within the context of this sale. What comparable or more capable reverbs could be found for a similar price if we're only discussing the sale price? I think it's plainly obvious that this thing is not worth a 10th (or even a 20th) of the full price in its current state, but that's not really what I was trying to ask about.Aloysius wrote:This is not a $13 Product.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026