It makes your pizza taste incredible! Worth every penny, I tell ya.Halonmusic wrote:Ive never understood the whole Moog hype. Whats so good about it anyway?
For everything else that matters, look at chk071's post.
It makes your pizza taste incredible! Worth every penny, I tell ya.Halonmusic wrote:Ive never understood the whole Moog hype. Whats so good about it anyway?
Alright. Maybe they wont sound the same, but many synthesizers can do what the Moog's can do.chk071 wrote:Define "the same". They surely won't sound the same.
If you won the lottery, why not just buy a a massive modular system?DuX wrote:It makes your pizza taste incredible! Worth every penny, I tell ya.Halonmusic wrote:Ive never understood the whole Moog hype. Whats so good about it anyway?
For everything else that matters, look at chk071's post.If I won the lottery...
That's so true. People are blinded by brands.Halonmusic wrote:Alright. Maybe they wont sound the same, but many synthesizers can do what the Moog's can do.chk071 wrote:Define "the same". They surely won't sound the same.
Glad someone else feels the same as me. And who wants to buy an overpriced, overhyped, mono synths when any synth could do what Moog's can do? Sure i guess its all about the filter and stuff, but still.DuX wrote:That's so true. People are blinded by brands.Halonmusic wrote:Alright. Maybe they wont sound the same, but many synthesizers can do what the Moog's can do.chk071 wrote:Define "the same". They surely won't sound the same.![]()
I can get almost the same basses with Synth-1. Moog synths are overhyped.
+1000chk071 wrote:From what i can say... lovely filter, really "thick" and poundy sound, very fast, snappy envelopes, and, for the Minimoog, there's surely also a big factor or accessibility, and play-ability, which makes it easy to use it on stage. Anyway, if Moog in general isn't for you, then it's surely difficult to bring the merits near. For me, they manufacture some of the finest, if not THE finest analog synths of them all.Halonmusic wrote:Ive never understood the whole Moog hype. Whats so good about it anyway?
Let me fix that for you....hardware Moogs are a substitute, not a replacement for software synths.beau921 wrote: software emulations are a substitute, not a replacement, for a real MOOG.
Leaving aside the subjective stuff (great sound etc), what I'm interested in when looking at vintage-analog synths is how they differ from a typical digital synth. There's always something, even if it's just a minor detail. In case of the Model D, however, it is a whole bunch of things. This makes it particularly interesting in my book.Halonmusic wrote:Ive never understood the whole Moog hype. Whats so good about it anyway?
Yes, and you guys pretty much captured, in software form, many of the subtleties that make the Minimoog Model D the most iconic synthesizer of all times.Richard_Synapse wrote:Leaving aside the subjective stuff (great sound etc), what I'm interested in when looking at vintage-analog synths is how they differ from a typical digital synth. There's always something, even if it's just a minor detail. In case of the Model D, however, it is a whole bunch of things. This makes it particularly interesting in my book.Halonmusic wrote:Ive never understood the whole Moog hype. Whats so good about it anyway?
Richard
Well atleast you guys added some stuff not available on the original. Polyphony is one of them. I like when developers do just that. Maybe i should demo the Legend.Richard_Synapse wrote:Leaving aside the subjective stuff (great sound etc), what I'm interested in when looking at vintage-analog synths is how they differ from a typical digital synth. There's always something, even if it's just a minor detail. In case of the Model D, however, it is a whole bunch of things. This makes it particularly interesting in my book.Halonmusic wrote:Ive never understood the whole Moog hype. Whats so good about it anyway?
Richard
Except what made the Minimoog so iconic was it's portability. Nobody held onto them once better synths from the likes of Sequential Circuits and Oberheim came along. I started going to see bands in 1979 and I honestly don't think I've ever seen anyone using a Minimoog on stage. Everyone had Prophet Vs and Pro-One's and MS-20s and Odysseys and Jupiter 8s and OB-XAs and CS-80s and pretty much anything but a Minimoog. I used to see them in shops, though, so you could still buy them. It's just that nobody did.Yorrrrrr wrote:Yes, and you guys pretty much captured, in software form, many of the subtleties that make the Minimoog Model D the most iconic synthesizer of all times.
By that logic though, the DX7 is "better" than all that stuff because everyone had a DX7 in the eighties and you saw them everywhere. And all those pointy guitars with sharp edges must have been better than 50's and 60's Fenders because in the 80's you'd have seen a lot of bands playing pointy guitars. There's a lot of reasons you may not have been seeing Minimoogs (cost, lack of polyphony, looking to lug less gear around on gigs) but I'd be careful about the using phrases like "better synths" in that context. I've heard a lot of people argue the Minimoog has never been bettered as a bass and lead synth, so taste is also a big factor, and how we define "better" and "best" and "for what" factors in too. It certainly wouldn't be the best synth for deep pad sounds, but does that make a Jupiter-8 a better synth than a Minimoog? What if I need a fat, punchy bass? The Mini would almost certainly win that shoot-out.BONES wrote:Except what made the Minimoog so iconic was it's portability. Nobody held onto them once better synths from the likes of Sequential Circuits and Oberheim came along. I started going to see bands in 1979 and I honestly don't think I've ever seen anyone using a Minimoog on stage. Everyone had Prophet Vs and Pro-One's and MS-20s and Odysseys and Jupiter 8s and OB-XAs and CS-80s and pretty much anything but a Minimoog. I used to see them in shops, though, so you could still buy them. It's just that nobody did.Yorrrrrr wrote:Yes, and you guys pretty much captured, in software form, many of the subtleties that make the Minimoog Model D the most iconic synthesizer of all times.
That is the normal course of life for any model of synth. It is not unique to the Model E. Tastes change and things get of fashion. People start to want shiny new things.BONES wrote:Except what made the Minimoog so iconic was it's portability. Nobody held onto them once better synths from the likes of Sequential Circuits and Oberheim came along. I started going to see bands in 1979 and I honestly don't think I've ever seen anyone using a Minimoog on stage. Everyone had Prophet Vs and Pro-One's and MS-20s and Odysseys and Jupiter 8s and OB-XAs and CS-80s and pretty much anything but a Minimoog. I used to see them in shops, though, so you could still buy them. It's just that nobody did.Yorrrrrr wrote:Yes, and you guys pretty much captured, in software form, many of the subtleties that make the Minimoog Model D the most iconic synthesizer of all times.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026