SoloRack v1.0 is here

[martin_l]

Is an "SS" logo really a good idea...especially in that kinda font...

That has already been discussed over the last pages, and SOLo has made several suggestions for new logos.

[ravasb]

I am curious what kind of copy protection this has. I did not see anything on the website. By the way, I am amazed by how efficient the CPU consumption is in comparison to Softube Modular. This project has a tremendous amount of potential.

[AnX]

Is an "SS" logo really a good idea...especially in that kinda font...

That has already been discussed over the last pages, and SOLo has made several suggestions for new logos.

The last ones posted are the ones that made me post, so...

[AnX]

Ss or sS would seem a better option. With a softer font it could look quite good

[martin_l]

Is an "SS" logo really a good idea...especially in that kinda font...

That has already been discussed over the last pages, and SOLo has made several suggestions for new logos.

The last ones posted are the ones that made me post, so...

Well, I do agree. The later ones are already a big improvement over the first one.
Given, that he already settled on the name "SoloStuff" which gives rise to these initials, and that he seems quite fond of the font, the later logos could be an option.

Personally, I also would prefer a different font, but in the end it's his call.

[S0lo]

Is an "SS" logo really a good idea...especially in that kinda font...

No it wasn't a good idea. But I wish I knew that 12 years ago when I first chose my webname and font. You know once you produce products with your label or logo on them, and people and the web links start to link to your website. It's not easy to revert back or change. Changing that font now is just a unnecessary headache for me. It means I'd have to spend hours searching for a "free for commercial use" font, make sure it works well in small or tiny sizes. revise the aesthetics over and over make sure it looks nice on the modules design I've chosen. It takes time, that I would like to otherwise spend making more modules for the synth.

ps, I'm from the middle east, so I never knew about that SS thing to start with. And even when I knew a few month back. I never thought that it's such a sensitive area for some people.

[S0lo]

I am curious what kind of copy protection this has. I did not see anything on the website. By the way, I am amazed by how efficient the CPU consumption is in comparison to Softube Modular. This project has a tremendous amount of potential.

Serial number copy protection.

Yeah, CPU was a priority for me from the beginning. I think soft modulars would really shine being able to add tens of modules without being constrained heavily by CPU. It can change the way a sound designer thinks.

[thecontrolcentre]

Thanks again for the feedback. So I guess it's between 7 and 8. Logo 5 is possible too. Lets see which one works best in tiny size for module panels.

Logo 8 looks good!

Logo 8 in away looks like two sawtooths.

ps....why not think about two plain S crossed in horizontal position...they are just like sine waves

Thats also valid. Thing is I was trying to keep a consistent aesthetic with the font. Othewise I'd better change the font, which I still do like.

The problem is the font as much as the name SS ... its the same font the nazis used. I really like the sine wave idea by lalo.

[kokotte]

.... What i care is about your new modules, the reverb and the new comb filter are Terrible, thanks.

Do you really mean "terrible" or did you want to say "terrific"? HUGE difference there...

i want to say:
super good !

[AnX]

ps, I'm from the middle east, so I never knew about that SS thing to start with. And even when I knew a few month back. I never thought that it's such a sensitive area for some people.

Are you kidding me?

Anyway, its really offensive, you need to change it.

[martin_l]

ps, I'm from the middle east, so I never knew about that SS thing to start with. And even when I knew a few month back. I never thought that it's such a sensitive area for some people.

Are you kidding me?

Anyway, its really offensive, you need to change it.

Yes, this style of font and the name "SS" have been used by the nazis carrying out the worst crimes against humanity. And, unfortunately, there are still groups around the world who sympathize with these ideas and admire their actions. These groups still use such fonts to show their "political orientation" (if one can all it such).

By using such font, and in particular the symbol "SS" some people might assume that you yourself share these perverted views. I assume that you don't and that you were simply unaware of the implications when you choose your font and name. However, people seeing that symbol might automatically associate you with these movements. Especially in a time when these right wing ideas are getting more visible again all over the world.

Personally, I would also advise to design a new logo, such as the two sine waves, or similar, but also the latest logos (No 8 and 5) could be acceptable.

It simply would be a shame if such a great product is tinted by unintended associations with such a horrible period of history.


Putting the logo issue aside, please, also have look at my previous posts about some questions relating the plugin.

Cheers,
Martin

[S0lo]

Logo already changed in KVR. will be changed soon in the synth. I apologies for people who felt offended. None was meant.

Hi SOlo,

great update. Love the new modules, especially the comb filter and the reverb. The reverb is really nice and smooth and can generate great textures. Also allowing more than 2 rows is a great new feature. Thanks a lot!!

I'm glad you like

I still have to experiment with the new advanced oversampling features, but it sounds very promising.

Only two remarks I have at the moment:

Regarding the oversampling, it seems that the "Audio/CV to DAW" modules always show the "no oversampling" sticker on then, even if oversampling is enabled. If indeed, the enabled oversampling does what it should do, namely adding the downsampling filter, maybe you should then remove that sticker, or add an LED to indicate which mode is used.

The "no oversampling" red label on the SA12 simply means that these outputs do not pass through the oversampling filter.

The "no oversampling" on the right click menu means (when checked) that this selected module will run at the DAW sampling rate. So if your oversampling at say 4X. the module will process only once every four clock ticks. The module is internally given all correct parameters to think that it's running at DAW rate.

For the reverb, I would have a feature request, if it still could be implemented somehow: I think it would be a great addition if the decay length could be controlled by a CV. This would allow, for instance, to keep some sound reverberating for a long time, and then quickly damp it by a CV before feeding a new sound into the reverb. I personally would see that more valuable than being able to control the stereo width by a CV.

But, as usual, all is great work!!

Thanks, Good idea, but too late now. BTW, the stereo CV really shines when you use the module in true stereo mode where you have completely different two inputs.

[martin_l]

I still have to experiment with the new advanced oversampling features, but it sounds very promising.

Only two remarks I have at the moment:

Regarding the oversampling, it seems that the "Audio/CV to DAW" modules always show the "no oversampling" sticker on then, even if oversampling is enabled. If indeed, the enabled oversampling does what it should do, namely adding the downsampling filter, maybe you should then remove that sticker, or add an LED to indicate which mode is used.

The "no oversampling" red label on the SA12 simply means that these outputs do not pass through the oversampling filter.

The "no oversampling" on the right click menu means (when checked) that this selected module will run at the DAW sampling rate. So if your oversampling at say 4X. the module will process only once every four clock ticks. The module is internally given all correct parameters to think that it's running at DAW rate.

Does that mean that the SA12 still has no option for an oversampling filter, even if I switch on the oversampling in the menu?

For the reverb, I would have a feature request, if it still could be implemented somehow: I think it would be a great addition if the decay length could be controlled by a CV. This would allow, for instance, to keep some sound reverberating for a long time, and then quickly damp it by a CV before feeding a new sound into the reverb. I personally would see that more valuable than being able to control the stereo width by a CV.

But, as usual, all is great work!!

Thanks, Good idea, but too late now. BTW, the stereo CV really shines when you use the module in true stereo mode where you have completely different two inputs.

That's a pity. CV for the decay would really be so useful. I guess if you moved down the output jack a bit, there would be space for a small toggle switch which could change the CV input from controlling the stereo width to controlling the decay. Just a thought....

[S0lo]

Does that mean that the SA12 still has no option for an oversampling filter, even if I switch on the oversampling in the menu?

Yes, any ToDAW output from 3 and above do not pass through the oversampling filter, I have my reasons for that. It's CPU related, too detailed to explain here. I might change that in future, but it will probably be a separate build to avoid CPU issues.

That's a pity. CV for the decay would really be so useful. I guess if you moved down the output jack a bit, there would be space for a small toggle switch which could change the CV input from controlling the stereo width to controlling the decay. Just a thought....

How about just automating that decay knob.

[martin_l]

Does that mean that the SA12 still has no option for an oversampling filter, even if I switch on the oversampling in the menu?

Yes, any ToDAW output from 3 and above do not pass through the oversampling filter, I have my reasons for that. It's CPU related, too detailed to explain here. I might change that in future, but it will probably be a separate build to avoid CPU issues.

As suggested before, maybe you could add a "stereo downsampler filter" module, which one could optionally patch before those outputs.

That's a pity. CV for the decay would really be so useful. I guess if you moved down the output jack a bit, there would be space for a small toggle switch which could change the CV input from controlling the stereo width to controlling the decay. Just a thought....

How about just automating that decay knob.

Not quite the same. Sometimes it would be good to control it via the internal sequencer, note events, etc.

Another thing I noted: When you increase the "mix" of the reverb module, the sounds get MUCH louder. It would seem more natural if the level was reduces internally such that the general level remains more or less constant.


By the way, I am just working on another massive patch for a generative ambient type piece which uses 3 different reverb modules with various modulations. I might post it somewhere when it's turning out nice.

Cheers,
Martin