I´m fine to not be agreed withKinh wrote: I dont agree what roman empire said bout emulating styles. If you wanna figure out how to make every section work with the next then thats just common sense.you dont need to mimic someone for that.
By mimicing a song which you find has some elements in it that you´d like to use in your own music, but can´t get it right, by doing the track from 0 till end you get to analyze (thanks jancivil, you nailed it!) and understand everything that´s going on there.
Example: There was a record company boss who back in the 90s asked me to do something like Robert Miles did. My theoretical background is pretty diverse, so I sat and listened to "Children", wrote down how many bars for each part, key changes, significances like the offbeat bass, amount of echo on the piano, etcetc. I then had a really clear idea of what defined this new socalled "piano trance" thingy, and went on to mimic the bass sound, bass drum sound, the way closed hi´s were layered to build up tension at some points and much more. Then I threw my own idea into it, also consisting of some sitar sounds that weren´t in children, and ended up with something that was close to children stylewise, but not more close than any other piano trance stuff at the time.
The more new to making music you are, the more mimicing can be the way to learn how things are done because you get to analyse every little detail and suddenly realize that certain things you didn´t even hear in the first place, but realize how important they are to give that certain sound you´re after.
The more you grow on music, the less you have to mimic, but now and then it´s extremely helpful.
Here´s the tune btw - please bear with the quality:
https://archive.org/details/RomanEmpireSubway
All done with Roland JV-1080, no VSTs here (so it´s OLD!).