No, Garbage is by Nomad factory.Aloysius wrote:Trash by iZotope is Garbage.inkwarp wrote:what are you talking about.
i am referring to software and 'not people'.
if you make a statement dismissing software as "garbage", justify it.
Which DAW do you wish you started on?
- KVRAF
- 4101 posts since 27 Aug, 2004
Even if the piano player can't play, keep the party going.
http://www.soundclick.com/mumpcake
https://mumpfucious.wordpress.com/
http://www.soundclick.com/mumpcake
https://mumpfucious.wordpress.com/
- KVRAF
- 2110 posts since 5 Oct, 2015 from Swedish / Living in Hong Kong
I know this nice and quite famous producer who work a lot in Cubase but last time I met him he was saying a lot of nice things about Studio One. He is a professional while I am a hobby producer. If you compare Cubase with Studio One would you say that you felt somewhat at home moving from Cubase to Studio One or was it really like a start from scratch?chk071 wrote:Same. I think i started with Fruity Loops, then used Reason occasionally, and then, at some point, bought a mag with Cubase LE on it, updated that to Elements, got Artist at some point, and now i mainly use Studio One 3 Pro, which i upgraded to from a used copy of Studio One 2 Producer. I'm planning to sell Cubase Artist, and focus completely on Studio One 3. I just like some things better than in Cubase (e.g. setting up MIDI surfaces, managing insert and send effects, managing virtual instruments, less windows etc.), and it also needs less mouse clicks for me.stardustmedia wrote:None really.
I used Cubase ages ago and for many years I didn't work with any DAW, until I picked up FL Studio. Still I am more and more curious about Studio One. I have a license for Bitwig but I didn't really feel at home with Bitwig so I never upgraded it. Doesn't mean Bitwig is bad or anything, just that it didn't really suit my way of working. When I get my new computer I might get a demo version of Studio One and try it.
Win 10 -64bit, CPU i7-7700K, 32Gb, Focusrite 2i2, FL-studio 20, Studio One 4, Reason 10
-
- KVRAF
- 6081 posts since 27 Jul, 2001 from Tarpon Springs, Florida, USA
In my opinion all DAW's should do a Swan.
(S1 emulation)
(S1 emulation)
My Studio: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7760&p=7777146#p7777146
-
- KVRAF
- 5144 posts since 3 Oct, 2013
my biggest problem with FL not its sound but its unprofessional look, hope the new FL gonna get some theme tweaking support, because the unofficial FL Studio Adobe mod looks astonishingly beautifulATN69 wrote:I know this nice and quite famous producer who work a lot in Cubase but last time I met him he was saying a lot of nice things about Studio One. He is a professional while I am a hobby producer. If you compare Cubase with Studio One would you say that you felt somewhat at home moving from Cubase to Studio One or was it really like a start from scratch?chk071 wrote:Same. I think i started with Fruity Loops, then used Reason occasionally, and then, at some point, bought a mag with Cubase LE on it, updated that to Elements, got Artist at some point, and now i mainly use Studio One 3 Pro, which i upgraded to from a used copy of Studio One 2 Producer. I'm planning to sell Cubase Artist, and focus completely on Studio One 3. I just like some things better than in Cubase (e.g. setting up MIDI surfaces, managing insert and send effects, managing virtual instruments, less windows etc.), and it also needs less mouse clicks for me.stardustmedia wrote:None really.
I used Cubase ages ago and for many years I didn't work with any DAW, until I picked up FL Studio. Still I am more and more curious about Studio One. I have a license for Bitwig but I didn't really feel at home with Bitwig so I never upgraded it. Doesn't mean Bitwig is bad or anything, just that it didn't really suit my way of working. When I get my new computer I might get a demo version of Studio One and try it.
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
- KVRian
- 811 posts since 10 Sep, 2015 from You haven't unlocked this character yet
To answer your question, I wish Ableton existed when I first started but I started. Now for something to read, I started with Cakewalk Apprentice back in the day. When I got determined to try electronic music whe tech became much more affordable, I started with FL Studio for about 2 days, then went to Ableton and stayed there for 2 years. Then I added Digital Performer to my DAWs for about 1 year, and lastly added Pro Tools. So there you go.
...and the electron responded, "what wall?"
- KVRAF
- 44165 posts since 11 Aug, 2008 from clown world
mumpcake wrote:No, Garbage is by Nomad factory.Aloysius wrote:Trash by iZotope is Garbage.inkwarp wrote:what are you talking about.
i am referring to software and 'not people'.
if you make a statement dismissing software as "garbage", justify it.
This is the same method MJ used when he was working on Anthony Marinelli's Thriller.
-
- KVRer
- 7 posts since 8 Jun, 2017
I ve spent so much time on fl and ableton,now for college i have to start learning reaper and learn a whole new interface.so maybe REAPER
-
- Banned
- 5357 posts since 7 May, 2015
This would require either sacrificing the current features or cheating by saying what I use now. (which I'm going to do anyways.
Unfortunately, despite the tiresome attempts at people to believe that all hosts are the same, there have been significant setbacks with many hosts that have kept me keeping up with the Joneses.
Currently I like two: Cubase 9 pro and bitwig. Bitwig is stable, fun and really very flexible for a new host (relatively) Cubase is a mad-man. But it's still pretty easy to learn and will do basically anything.
I used to love reason as well, but in nearly 3 years of using it, workflow enhancements are virtually non-existent. But it's still a good host.
I'd say today that cubase is as good a starting point as there is as you really don't need anything but the program itself. But there are things about cubase that I have had issues with in the past, so this is my second time around.
Unfortunately, despite the tiresome attempts at people to believe that all hosts are the same, there have been significant setbacks with many hosts that have kept me keeping up with the Joneses.
Currently I like two: Cubase 9 pro and bitwig. Bitwig is stable, fun and really very flexible for a new host (relatively) Cubase is a mad-man. But it's still pretty easy to learn and will do basically anything.
I used to love reason as well, but in nearly 3 years of using it, workflow enhancements are virtually non-existent. But it's still a good host.
I'd say today that cubase is as good a starting point as there is as you really don't need anything but the program itself. But there are things about cubase that I have had issues with in the past, so this is my second time around.
-
- KVRAF
- 3506 posts since 12 May, 2011
When I started using computers for making music, (1992) there weren't many choices. Cubase (and Cubeat, I think) or Notator on the Atari, Bars And Pipes on the Amiga and Pro Tools. Logic, perhaps, before Apple got it's mitts on it.
I went with Cubase, and, apart from a 10 year break when I made no music at all, I'm still using it.
I went with Cubase, and, apart from a 10 year break when I made no music at all, I'm still using it.
-
- KVRAF
- 3186 posts since 18 Mar, 2008
+1Aloysius wrote:DubTurbo
This entire forum is wading through predictions, opinions, barely formed thoughts, drama, and whining. If you don't enjoy that, why are you here?
ShawnG