It's almost 2018. What companies do you feel are going in the right direction? Who do you feel is not, and why? Could be any company.
-Logix X
-FL Studio
-Studio One
-Reaper
-Sonar
-Maschine (sequencer)
-Pro Tools
-Cubase
etc...
3-4 Prediction who is going int he right direction?
-
beatmangler443 beatmangler443 https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=306784
- KVRist
- 421 posts since 11 Jun, 2013
-
- KVRAF
- 5144 posts since 3 Oct, 2013
next FL Studio version gonna get:
- multi-time signature
- multi-arrangement in PlayList editor
- AI based ghost composer "machine-learning based chord, melody generator (similar to Riff Machine, but much easier to use), more when we release it in a FL Studio 20 beta." - http://forum.image-line.com/viewtopic.p ... 0#p1245350
- APDC fix
- Freezing
- some new mixer insert slot
+ Mac
and dunno what else
for me
- multi-time signature
- multi-arrangement in PlayList editor
- AI based ghost composer "machine-learning based chord, melody generator (similar to Riff Machine, but much easier to use), more when we release it in a FL Studio 20 beta." - http://forum.image-line.com/viewtopic.p ... 0#p1245350
- APDC fix
- Freezing
- some new mixer insert slot
+ Mac
and dunno what else
for me"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
-
- KVRAF
- 4084 posts since 28 Jan, 2011 from MEXICO
there isn't a right direction, there are many users with different needs.
But from a business model and market share I think Protools is making the worst choices and its declining.
All companies in 1 year update cycles are not very attractive for me also, I feel they milk their users way too much without any significant additions: Reason and Cubase are the main offenders.
Logic, Live, FL Studio and Studio one are ones I feel have the better business.
But from a business model and market share I think Protools is making the worst choices and its declining.
All companies in 1 year update cycles are not very attractive for me also, I feel they milk their users way too much without any significant additions: Reason and Cubase are the main offenders.
Logic, Live, FL Studio and Studio one are ones I feel have the better business.
dedication to flying
-
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
have to see what Magix does with it's acquisitions,that could go either way
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 10166 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Not forgetting its relatively new procedural resizable touch friendly GUI
xbitz wrote:next FL Studio version gonna get:
- multi-time signature
- multi-arrangement in PlayList editor
- AI based ghost composer "machine-learning based chord, melody generator (similar to Riff Machine, but much easier to use), more when we release it in a FL Studio 20 beta." - http://forum.image-line.com/viewtopic.p ... 0#p1245350
- APDC fix
- Freezing
- some new mixer insert slot
+ Mac
and dunno what else
-
- KVRAF
- 7115 posts since 22 Jan, 2005 from Sweden
I think ProTools is brilliant in the collaboration area.
Just define certain tracks as shared - and these are exchanged over cloud.
Looking ahead I think that would satisfy a trend - getting individual tracks done by professionals you hire.
It will also open up for any good musician do a lot of work without travelling all over.
Maybe for us DIY not as important - but for lower production costs for studios and not only rely on local musicians that thinking is brilliant.
To stay current on PT the fee of $99 annually is also more than decent.
And PT First would satisfy education area at low cost while student.
Just define certain tracks as shared - and these are exchanged over cloud.
Looking ahead I think that would satisfy a trend - getting individual tracks done by professionals you hire.
It will also open up for any good musician do a lot of work without travelling all over.
Maybe for us DIY not as important - but for lower production costs for studios and not only rely on local musicians that thinking is brilliant.
To stay current on PT the fee of $99 annually is also more than decent.
And PT First would satisfy education area at low cost while student.
-
- KVRAF
- 1593 posts since 2 Oct, 2016 from Planet X-19
Haven't ate a Maccas since I got diabetes a couple of years ago, but if I ever went back on the promise I made to myself, I'd get a BK double whopper with cheese or consider a Carl's jr double colon buster.
-
- KVRAF
- 5144 posts since 3 Oct, 2013
most important was the third-party Adobe Black skin hackVariKusBrainZ wrote:Not forgetting its relatively new procedural resizable touch friendly GUI
xbitz wrote:next FL Studio version gonna get:
- multi-time signature
- multi-arrangement in PlayList editor
- AI based ghost composer "machine-learning based chord, melody generator (similar to Riff Machine, but much easier to use), more when we release it in a FL Studio 20 beta." - http://forum.image-line.com/viewtopic.p ... 0#p1245350
- APDC fix
- Freezing
- some new mixer insert slot
+ Mac
and dunno what else
it extracted the fruity factor from FL Studio http://forum.image-line.com/viewtopic.p ... 9#p1250869
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat
-
- KVRAF
- 2140 posts since 16 Jan, 2013 from USA
Anyone going to a scalable GUI has my approval. Anyone going to a configurable interface also. There are too many resolutions out there for fixed font sizes and way too many features to just squeeze them onto the screen Studio One-style. And aging eyes...
In terms of capabilities, they're all headed in the right direction. Well, sort of. If you're an EDM fan. The new challenge seems to be harnessing all the stuff, or keeping it out of the way for those that don't need it. Reaper could be the best at this, but it takes so much time and effort to customize.
To me they're all progressing feature-wise, just not necessarily all where I'd like them to go. My one backslide would be Bitwig because of the 2.x interface. It looks nice, but is about half as efficient as the old one when you get to editing. Probably making the best progress on the interface front are Cubase and FL Studio. Okay, Mulab as well, though it needs workflow improvements.
In terms of capabilities, they're all headed in the right direction. Well, sort of. If you're an EDM fan. The new challenge seems to be harnessing all the stuff, or keeping it out of the way for those that don't need it. Reaper could be the best at this, but it takes so much time and effort to customize.
To me they're all progressing feature-wise, just not necessarily all where I'd like them to go. My one backslide would be Bitwig because of the 2.x interface. It looks nice, but is about half as efficient as the old one when you get to editing. Probably making the best progress on the interface front are Cubase and FL Studio. Okay, Mulab as well, though it needs workflow improvements.
-
- KVRAF
- 2140 posts since 16 Jan, 2013 from USA
Actually, I hate that Mac-like top menu Cubase added to the PC version. Sigh.
-
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
for me, Steinberg in the wrong direction making the download for Cubase 9 so large with a whole lot of content I won't even install. No problem, everyone caters to EDM and prefab people today but I don't think I like to be forced to download all that.
-
- KVRAF
- 2140 posts since 16 Jan, 2013 from USA
True enough. More is not always necessarily better. Took a look at Cubase 3 the other day. Liked it. Sigh.
-
- KVRAF
- 7115 posts since 22 Jan, 2005 from Sweden
Agree - smart installers like Waves, Cakewalk, XLNAudio, Toontrack has is the way to go.jancivil wrote:for me, Steinberg in the wrong direction making the download for Cubase 9 so large with a whole lot of content I won't even install. No problem, everyone caters to EDM and prefab people today but I don't think I like to be forced to download all that.
You see what you have in products and what is up to date - and no sweat updates...