PUSH 3 .... coming soon ? what could be added or improved ?

Anything about hardware musical instruments.
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Push

Post

Echoes in the Attic wrote: If Live went full MPE and Push 3 was like a linnstrument where the grid squares were connected allowing bending from one note to another, I'd switch back to Live from Bitwig as well. Using everything in one controller like that would be great.
Echoes in the Attic wrote: The cool thing about the size of the push pads is that they are just big enough to play drum hits with two fingers for faster sequences. That's harder with the linnstrument. Push should leave it's pads the same size but allow gliding between them. Would such an awesome controller.
which is it man ?

you seem to be saying contradictory things.

At any rate, check the posts from pdxindy and I prior to this last reply of yours. I had not realised that linnstrument does in fact have gaps, something analogous in feeling to frets, between the pads. I had mistakenly thought the linnstrument was a continuous pad (i.e one continuous smooth surface), and the grid was printed on as a visual guide. As someone who was intrested in the linnstrument (though only a cursory 'that will be something i might seriously consider when LIVE gets full MPE support' level of interest, hence having erroneous ideas about how it feels for example) that is yet another favourable feature, for my tastes. So, as you can infer from the previous messages between pdxindy and I, when you said you wished a PUSH hardware update would be like the linnstrument - in replying to that I erroneously assumed that meant one continuous, smooth pad. Knowing that the linnstrument is actually a grid of what feels like individual pads that you can glide between, and what you're saying now about leaving the PUSH pads as they are - just allow gliding .... well of course, why wouldn't I support that ? If it functions the same, and most importantly keeps the feel I prefer, and delivers more function. win ... what's not to support.


as far as single, continuous pads, like the ROLI .... ya, listen, I know what quantisation is, how it works. When i first expressed my reluctance to your suggestion (not fully understanding how a linnstrument felt), i referred to it in terms of 'want' rather than 'need' ... when you asked why I 'needed' it, I should have stuck with my initial choice of verb - 'want' .... because I understand, of course, that the technology doesn't 'need' frets to figure out what note I most likely want to play when i strike a region. I want the feeling of indvidual pads though, out of preference ... having a physical feeling of where one note starts and ends is useful to an amateur like me.

Feel aside .... I'm still skeptical how a single large continuous pad, be it continuous underneath but individual grid feeling on the surface or continuous underneath and on the surface, would fair against a typical, bona fide beat box style individual pads controller. Just in terms of abuse, velocity sensitivity, and longevity after continuous beatings (is that a pun?). I'd like more convincing on that.

But sure, a PUSH 3, functionally something akin to a linnstrument but with the pads sized and feeling as they are currently on the PUSH ... I can't really say I'd have much against that, conceptually, other than maybe some durability concerns that could be alleviated with more research, positive user feedback etc.

Post

Daags wrote:
Feel aside .... I'm still skeptical how a single large continuous pad, be it continuous underneath but individual grid feeling on the surface or continuous underneath and on the surface, would fair against a typical, bona fide beat box style individual pads controller. Just in terms of abuse, velocity sensitivity, and longevity after continuous beatings (is that a pun?). I'd like more convincing on that.

But sure, a PUSH 3, functionally something akin to a linnstrument but with the pads sized and feeling as they are currently on the PUSH ... I can't really say I'd have much against that, conceptually, other than maybe some durability concerns that could be alleviated with more research, positive user feedback etc.
It would be interesting to see some side by side comparisons.

I find the Linnstrument better for playing drums than my Push 1... The Linnstrument has significantly better velocity and aftertouch sensitivity. Not to mention you can do side to side vibrato so naturally... plus the Y axis can modulate whatever you want.

I don't have a Push 2, only played with it in the shop but it is for sure an improvement on the pads. Push 1 the aftertouch is hard to control.

Even if a Push 3 did not allow pitch sliding from pad to pad, it would help expressiveness if you had X and Y axis modulation just on each pad.

Post

pdxindy wrote:
Daags wrote:
Feel aside .... I'm still skeptical how a single large continuous pad, be it continuous underneath but individual grid feeling on the surface or continuous underneath and on the surface, would fair against a typical, bona fide beat box style individual pads controller. Just in terms of abuse, velocity sensitivity, and longevity after continuous beatings (is that a pun?). I'd like more convincing on that.

But sure, a PUSH 3, functionally something akin to a linnstrument but with the pads sized and feeling as they are currently on the PUSH ... I can't really say I'd have much against that, conceptually, other than maybe some durability concerns that could be alleviated with more research, positive user feedback etc.
It would be interesting to see some side by side comparisons.

I find the Linnstrument better for playing drums than my Push 1... The Linnstrument has significantly better velocity and aftertouch sensitivity. Not to mention you can do side to side vibrato so naturally... plus the Y axis can modulate whatever you want.
wow, I always suspected that the Maschine was most likely to give the better drum playing experience than the PUSH (certainly PUSH 1), but I'm pleasantly surprised to hear your feedback on the Linnstrument - I hadn't wondered which would perform better for drums comparing it to the PUSH, but I guess I would have expected the PUSH to. I've seen the Roger Linn demo videos of him demonstrating the Linnstrument as a 'note-repeat on steroids' type device for drums, the expressive nature of the Linnstrument is obvious, but the size of those pads ... looking forward to see what his 21st Century Linndrum will be like, if his success with the Linnstrument is anything to go by it seems like the pad experience of the new Linndrum could be the real USP.
pdxindy wrote: Even if a Push 3 did not allow pitch sliding from pad to pad, it would help expressiveness if you had X and Y axis modulation just on each pad.
ya, I would expect that at the very least. I will be buying and using a PUSH for the first time around about the LIVE 10 official release date, so I don't have a frame of reference ... but I suspect if the pads were a wee bit bigger I'd feel the benefit, not to mention it would give you more area for expression if a PUSH 3 hardware update comes in sync with full MPE support in LIVE 10. I don't recall seeing people complain about the pad size either though, so probably just inate skepticism or a dogged reluctance to veer too far from the 'classic' mpc paradigm.

Post

Daags wrote:
Echoes in the Attic wrote: If Live went full MPE and Push 3 was like a linnstrument where the grid squares were connected allowing bending from one note to another, I'd switch back to Live from Bitwig as well. Using everything in one controller like that would be great.
Echoes in the Attic wrote: The cool thing about the size of the push pads is that they are just big enough to play drum hits with two fingers for faster sequences. That's harder with the linnstrument. Push should leave it's pads the same size but allow gliding between them. Would such an awesome controller.
which is it man ?

you seem to be saying contradictory things.
I honestly can't tell what you find contradictory there. One statement was hoping for connected pads on Push, the other was pointing out that Pushes pads are larger, which is good. What do you find contradictory there?

So as for which is it, well, both. Push should get rid of the gaps (or make them small indents like linnstrument so that you can glide over the different pads), but keep the pads themselves (and overall grid) the same size, as it's convenient to be able to hit pads with two fingers. I'm lost as to what is contradictory about this.

Post

Echoes in the Attic wrote: I honestly can't tell what you find contradictory there. One statement was hoping for connected pads on Push, the other was pointing out that Pushes pads are larger, which is good. What do you find contradictory there?

So as for which is it, well, both. Push should get rid of the gaps (or make them small indents like linnstrument so that you can glide over the different pads), but keep the pads themselves (and overall grid) the same size, as it's convenient to be able to hit pads with two fingers. I'm lost as to what is contradictory about this.
No offence, but at this stage I honestly don't give a shit. This back and forth with you has drained my will to live. I reckon I've laid out everything I have to say about this in my previous response. If you're still puzzled about my initial comments, my subsequent comments, and why I made them, how I currently feel about your suggestion, etc, I'm sorry but I'm not putting any more energy into it. Chalk it up to crossed wires, for which you are blameless.

:arrow:

Post

You know you could have just kept this all in the Ableton 10 thread
—> viewtopic.php?p=6906895
:borg:

Post

First of all. I think all daws should support MPE natively. One can implement mpe in let's call it arrangement view for most daws but it's a lot of work. Session view requires a multi channel gateway (found in only a few third party plugins) to have different instruments assigned to different channels. I've done this with.. KLC M1 in many hosts. Again it's a lot of work.

With regards to pads and pad surfaces. Yes there are psuedo frets on the linstrument which makes it near impossible to initiate a "spike" as when keyboard players play two adjoining notes with one finger the surface design also doesn't allow for "Barring" using the side of the hand or spiking the keys. Something that I find annoying as hell. It's a trade off like everything else in life. With the artiphon depending on how it is set up it can run as a fretless instrument (even though it does have nurbs running under) Which allows for even smoother "fretless" performance as one would expect from the continum or a frettless instrument. While the artiphon instrument one does allow for continuous control along the x grid it does not allow for that type of control along the y direction. They are "strings" rubbery glued down strings similar in many ways to star labs logarithmic necks such as the baby z. Though the artiphon does not have a logarithmic neck. Which brings me to the area of technique and familiarity (armature)


I am less comfortable with the artiphon than I was with the linstrument or any unconventional midi controller I've had in the past. I'm less comfortable mostly because I haven't devoted the time required to become comfortable and it's not the same as playing a guitar or ztar by any stretch of the imagination. If you are mostly familiar with one type of controller then it makes it harder for you to adopt to another one. I can't call myself a drummer but I have spent time on an acoustic kit. I've played drums on tones of drum machines, LinnDrum, Alesis, Yamaha, Roland and early mpc. Some were too stiff and some were too soft. Getting use to some controllers can be easier for some than others. I find it much easier to drum on the artiphon then I did on the linnstrument. But there are things on the linnstrument I could do that just aren't achievable on the artiphon. One thing is for certain. After experiencing MPE I'm less inclined to go back to non mpe controllers. I'd rather make the most of mpe and adopt my playing style to it through practice than take a step back for convenience of familiarity of armature.
Dell Vostro i9 64GB Ram Windows 11 Pro, Cubase, Bitwig, Mixcraft Guitar Pod Go, Linntrument Nektar P1, Novation Launchpad

Post

I don't think there will be any push 3 before long given the release of live 10 and the new features of push 2.

Post Reply

Return to “Hardware (Instruments and Effects)”