yeah, well next topic will be "What makes U-He Zebra help people improve their sex drive"Teksonik wrote:You're absolutely right. You have no clue..........layzer wrote:no clue
or "What makes UH-e Zebra help people quit heroin"
yeah, well next topic will be "What makes U-He Zebra help people improve their sex drive"Teksonik wrote:You're absolutely right. You have no clue..........layzer wrote:no clue
Yes same here, the one and only group buy for Z2. Great VFM, just gets better and better.pdxindy wrote:I purchased Zebra 2 when it first was coming out. There was an intro discount.
Since then, Zebra 2 has received easily 3-4 paid upgrades worth of new features, workflow improvements, midi support, new presets, ongoing OS support, etc. I have not had to pay a single penny for a decade. It is an incredible deal over the long haul.
BTW where's clueless gone ? ...i'm wondering !Teksonik wrote:You're absolutely right. You have no clue..........layzer wrote:no clue
Yes, I prepared for this moment by registering a second account in 2002.kmonkey wrote:Yep...after being one of the most loved KVR developers with top of the top products for years now and known to not use public stunts like Slate or others - U-he decided to register fishy account to desperately promote itself...And he is doing it so subtle that noone can comprehend timeline..Kinh wrote:Shit, i think something fishy is going on here. This is the 2nd post ive seen recently with the same theme "what makes u-he so great? " Everyone then replies with "oh because of this and that". A little fishy if you ask me.
makes sense totally
The long con. Brilliant!Urs wrote:Yes, I prepared for this moment by registering a second account in 2002.kmonkey wrote:Yep...after being one of the most loved KVR developers with top of the top products for years now and known to not use public stunts like Slate or others - U-he decided to register fishy account to desperately promote itself...And he is doing it so subtle that noone can comprehend timeline..Kinh wrote:Shit, i think something fishy is going on here. This is the 2nd post ive seen recently with the same theme "what makes u-he so great? " Everyone then replies with "oh because of this and that". A little fishy if you ask me.
makes sense totally
You're absolutely right, nobody really regards Reaktor as a "workhorse synth", neither did I, so there's no comparison... but imo Zebra is too cumbersome to fill that slot either, and that slot is heavily contested, with some viable candidates costing half of it. I'd personally get something more nimble and modern UI as the do-it-all synth.Urs wrote: Please allow me to speak openly. You kinda need a PhD or something to do in Reaktor what you can do in Zebra within a few minutes. I can't do it. Even some of the most basic factory patches of Zebra would bring your CPU to its melting point should you succeed to recreate the result in Reaktor (remember: Zebra's control rate is 10+ kHz... set Reaktor to that if you like. Also, Zebra's signal flow is stereo all through the signal path). Reaktor can do almost anything and it's very well suited for this and that, but it's IMHO totally not suited to be a workhorse synth in a day to day production environment. And why is that? - Easy: Reaktor comes with thousands and thousands of ensembles, modules and building blocks which all look, sound and behave differently. If you want to load a patch and tweak it to your needs you first need to understand it. So yes, you can do almost everything, but it comes with a cost. The currency of that cost is *time*. No-one has time. Reaktor's biggest feature is also its weakest spot. It's a usability nightmare which emerged from the most comprehensive playground for synthesis. Can't have one without the other.
Zebra can do a shitload of things too. In almost no time and with only a few modules whose sound, look and behaviour just need to be learned once. With a very good ratio of control rate vs. CPU which IIRC is 16 times higher than Reaktor's standard setting.
So where again are we at in the value discussion?
I see Zebra as the king of the hill when it comes to an easy to use, advanced sound design synth. And has been without competition (IMO) as far as the best bang for the buck in such a synth..jon wrote:but imo Zebra is too cumbersome to fill that slot either, and that slot is heavily contested, with some viable candidates costing half of it. I'd personally get something more nimble and modern UI as the do-it-all synth.
I see Zebra as an advanced sound design synth, but is overpriced in that sector when compared with the king of the hill.
A more than ten year old virtual synth that still can wipe the floor in 2017 with the competition with regard to flexibility and range of sound design options.ATS wrote: Why are people so much more passionate about Zebra than most other synths?
Curious what these would be. UVI Falcon is nearly twice the price. I don't think anything else comes close to the breadth, depth, and workflow of Zebra..jon wrote:I'd personally get something more nimble and modern UI as the do-it-all synth.
I like and bought Plugmon's work for Diva and Zebra. But TBH, what improved my workflow the most was reading the manuals.ZeePok wrote:I felt the same way. And I found that you can improve the workflow a great deal with the Massive Modular skins from Plugmon.
yellowmix wrote:Curious what these would be. UVI Falcon is nearly twice the price. I don't think anything else comes close to the breadth, depth, and workflow of Zebra..jon wrote:I'd personally get something more nimble and modern UI as the do-it-all synth.
Also, take a look at the Massive Modular skin by Plugmon.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026