Cubase 9.5 launch today!
-
- KVRist
- 313 posts since 19 Oct, 2014
Amazing update, nearly perfect DAW. Clip launcher and Push support only things I miss from Ableton.
-
- KVRAF
- 4739 posts since 25 Mar, 2016 from Seattle
Interesting.... I’m tempted to do the $325 Cubase Pro crossgrade from Ableton but the only thing that’s stopping me is I love my Push 2.7blanche wrote:Amazing update, nearly perfect DAW. Clip launcher and Push support only things I miss from Ableton.
I’m testing Live 10 and really don’t think it’s worth $299 for the upgrade, pretty underwhelming new features.
I haven’t used Cubase since it was on the Atari STFM but this 9.5 update and Ableton’s lack of creativity has got me tempted.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
Keep in mind that Cubase is linear composition. No clip concepts here.simmo75 wrote: I haven’t used Cubase since it was on the Atari STFM but this 9.5 update and Ableton’s lack of creativity has got me tempted.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRAF
- 4739 posts since 25 Mar, 2016 from Seattle
I'm fine with that, I've been writing music way longer than clip based DAWs have been about.SJ_Digriz wrote:Keep in mind that Cubase is linear composition. No clip concepts here.simmo75 wrote: I haven’t used Cubase since it was on the Atari STFM but this 9.5 update and Ableton’s lack of creativity has got me tempted.
My main concern is stability and CPU usage on mac.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
simmo75 wrote: I'm fine with that, I've been writing music way longer than clip based DAWs have been about.
can't help answer the Mac part.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
-
- KVRian
- 550 posts since 15 Aug, 2011 from Teesside
I'm guessing that might happen if you uninstall the old version first. I've got midi devices mapped, sysex and everything. Cubase 9.5 loaded with out me needing to reassign any ports or load any of the device files. The windows docked, buttons, tabs in bars all as previously set. My keycommands and Macros still in effect. Personal quick controls loadable in the drop down. VST's still displaying as set via Plugin Manager. Media bay with my favourites and folders to scan, it even automatically assigned them to the new tile selection in the right zone.Keith99 wrote:It didnt for me, like Journey I had to redo all mine.
I didn't have to move 1 thing. The only thing that needed loading was my extra drum maps.
I will be fishing out those files though. I like to back them up.
Click for music links... Eurotrash!
MSI z390, i7 9700k OC, Noctua Cooling, NVMe 970 Pro, 64GB 3200C16, BeQuiet PSU, W11, Cubase 13, Avenger, Spire, Nexus, iZotope, Virus TI (INTERGRATED).
MSI z390, i7 9700k OC, Noctua Cooling, NVMe 970 Pro, 64GB 3200C16, BeQuiet PSU, W11, Cubase 13, Avenger, Spire, Nexus, iZotope, Virus TI (INTERGRATED).
- KVRAF
- 4749 posts since 15 Jul, 2001 from Holmfirth, West Yorkshire, U.K
Not upgrade to 9.5 yet (I will soon) but I can tell you Cubase 9.0.30 is running like a dream on sierra.
The audio performance easy doubles Live 9, I did a test running MReverb VST in both live and cubase and live 9 is a joke.
I did email Ableton about how poor it was and this is the reply. decide for yourself.
Hello,
Thanks for reaching out about this. Indeed, Live and Cubase are completely different programs and are not identically optimized. The two when compared in various ways will probably always show different results, as with any two DAWs. In your test, it sounds like Cubase is more efficient with this particular task, although there are many variables about your tests that we don't know.
We are always working to optimize Live's performance, so this may improve over time.
In any case, it is outside of our support scope to benchmark the software, since it isn't something we can provide an immediate solution to.
All the best,
*****
The audio performance easy doubles Live 9, I did a test running MReverb VST in both live and cubase and live 9 is a joke.
I did email Ableton about how poor it was and this is the reply. decide for yourself.
Hello,
Thanks for reaching out about this. Indeed, Live and Cubase are completely different programs and are not identically optimized. The two when compared in various ways will probably always show different results, as with any two DAWs. In your test, it sounds like Cubase is more efficient with this particular task, although there are many variables about your tests that we don't know.
We are always working to optimize Live's performance, so this may improve over time.
In any case, it is outside of our support scope to benchmark the software, since it isn't something we can provide an immediate solution to.
All the best,
*****
simmo75 wrote:I'm fine with that, I've been writing music way longer than clip based DAWs have been about.SJ_Digriz wrote:Keep in mind that Cubase is linear composition. No clip concepts here.simmo75 wrote: I haven’t used Cubase since it was on the Atari STFM but this 9.5 update and Ableton’s lack of creativity has got me tempted.
My main concern is stability and CPU usage on mac.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Fair enough. I knew they weren't continuing to update it, I did not know there were security issues.Romantique Tp wrote:In the future you'll be able to render videos with audio. That's part of the reason why they're telling you to "watch this space".
jancivil seems to be a bit out of the loop but Quicktime for Windows was discontinued by Apple with various widely publicized vulnerabilities. Requiring Quicktime to be installed would put Steinberg's customers at a huge security risk.
Can you cite where you get they're going to create the ability to export audio in Cubase? That would be huge.
Pissed me off to update and something I rely on is kaput, no warning. I'm too old for time to be flushed down the tubes by someone I'm paying.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
There actually was a big announcement post prior to the release of the upgrade. The QT problems were a big stink and actually caused the Borgz more trouble than it caused you. It actually forced them to do something that needed to be done for a long time.jancivil wrote: no warning
But, there is no saying when/if the replace audio in video function will come back. We just know the new engine is in progress.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Really, a big announcement to signal to us all that Replace Audio in Video would fail for some time to come? And this was distributed how, exactly? Or was I to infer from 'not based in QuickTime' Replace Audio in Video was kaput indefinitely.
I don't think it was in the version history, something I do read.
http://download.steinberg.net/downloads ... istory.pdf
I don't think it was in the version history, something I do read.
http://download.steinberg.net/downloads ... istory.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
not to mention that prior to that release there were a LOT of discussion threads around the QT problems. And, contrary to normal behavior, the Borgz guys were talking about it.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
OK for your purposes that is a BIG announcement. What is that, an Avid forum? I don't know what that is or how it is I'm supposed to find that this must've have been really obvious now. 
As to bullshit, I mean I find the company doing this bullshit. I find them telling me to GFM behind a stolen account bullshit. I find Steinberg to be brimming with bullshit. That is my mind saving the screenshot, alright? I am more pissed off than ever about it, so thanks for that.
As to bullshit, I mean I find the company doing this bullshit. I find them telling me to GFM behind a stolen account bullshit. I find Steinberg to be brimming with bullshit. That is my mind saving the screenshot, alright? I am more pissed off than ever about it, so thanks for that.
-
- KVRist
- 267 posts since 2 Nov, 2015
You're the only one complaining about this right now. You might be the only one who didn't know about this yet.
- KVRAF
- 6097 posts since 5 Jul, 2001 from Just about .... there
He/she's not the only one complaining. I'm just pointing out that it wasn't a secret. It's almost impossible to tell everyone every possible change that may affect the user base through every possible media channel. So, jan missed it. It affected him/her. I agree with the frustration too ... it's just that QT had to go, and the proper solution is not easy.Romantique Tp wrote:You're the only one complaining about this right now. You might be the only one who didn't know about this yet.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer