What are sound waves?
-
- KVRer
- 11 posts since 26 Nov, 2017
Hi everyone on KVR, I want to share the first video of the serie Understanding Audio, I`m working on this project to share knowledge about basic audio.
Through this video we are going to talk about:
- What are sound waves
- How sound waves are measured
- Shapes and sound of waves
Thanks
Through this video we are going to talk about:
- What are sound waves
- How sound waves are measured
- Shapes and sound of waves
Thanks
- KVRAF
- 2726 posts since 2 Jun, 2016
Not a bad effort at what can be a dry subject, and the graphics certainly helped.
I don't know if you'll get many enthusiastic followers on this forum though, as a fair few of us know already quite a bit about the subject matter.
Lastly, the word sawtooth is not pronounced how you pronounced it.
The first 3 letters are pronounced as ''SOR'' not ''SOW''.
I don't know if you'll get many enthusiastic followers on this forum though, as a fair few of us know already quite a bit about the subject matter.
Lastly, the word sawtooth is not pronounced how you pronounced it.
The first 3 letters are pronounced as ''SOR'' not ''SOW''.
- KVRAF
- 6113 posts since 7 Jan, 2005 from Corporate States of America
"sor"? I don't pronounce sawtooth as "sortooth". I pronounce the aw as in "awe", with an S at the beginning. S awe tooth.
- dysamoria.com
my music @ SoundCloud
my music @ SoundCloud
- KVRAF
- 2726 posts since 2 Jun, 2016
^^ Jace, you're trying to start an argument about exactly the same pronunciation...
SOR: as in ''this OR that'' with an s on the front.
You and I certainly don't pronounce SAWTOOTH as SOW (rhyming with COW), as the video creator does.
SOR: as in ''this OR that'' with an s on the front.
You and I certainly don't pronounce SAWTOOTH as SOW (rhyming with COW), as the video creator does.
- Banned
- 9081 posts since 15 Oct, 2017 from U.S.
- KVRAF
- 10156 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Pixiefarts
- Beware the Quoth
- 35500 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
sortoof, in saff landan, like, innit... 
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
el-bo (formerly ebow) el-bo (formerly ebow) https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=208007
- KVRAF
- 18111 posts since 24 May, 2009 from A galaxy, far far away
For a course teaching about audio, I would expect your audio to be on-point. Start with your plosives, and work up from there.
Also, perhaps you might think about adding subtitles
Also, perhaps you might think about adding subtitles
-
- KVRAF
- 2066 posts since 11 Aug, 2012 from omfr morf form romf frmo
1. Presenter has an accent, it's understandable, deal with it. The video does have subtitles/captions in English and Spanish if you toggle the CC button and they are accurate. That's a plus for educational materials.
2. Audio does not start until 17 seconds. Additionally, the audio introduces what is already known via the video title and words in the video itself. The actual tutorial does not start until 30 seconds into it. This is an eternity on YouTube. People will bounce.
To be honest, the intro is pointless. For 30 seconds it is there to show your logo and compositing skills, when the logo and skills are present throughout the entire video. Cut that down to 2 seconds, max. And even that is far too long. Look at other tutorial videos, they jump into it right away. Your channel's introduction video is supposed to do all this introducing (and that itself drags, I bounced 5 seconds into it).
3. The tutorial itself is pretty good and the graphics and animations are very helpful. I'm not sure what audience you have in mind because you're glossing over terms like "oscillation" without explanation, but then explain basic terms like "frequency".
2. Audio does not start until 17 seconds. Additionally, the audio introduces what is already known via the video title and words in the video itself. The actual tutorial does not start until 30 seconds into it. This is an eternity on YouTube. People will bounce.
To be honest, the intro is pointless. For 30 seconds it is there to show your logo and compositing skills, when the logo and skills are present throughout the entire video. Cut that down to 2 seconds, max. And even that is far too long. Look at other tutorial videos, they jump into it right away. Your channel's introduction video is supposed to do all this introducing (and that itself drags, I bounced 5 seconds into it).
3. The tutorial itself is pretty good and the graphics and animations are very helpful. I'm not sure what audience you have in mind because you're glossing over terms like "oscillation" without explanation, but then explain basic terms like "frequency".
- Banned
- 9081 posts since 15 Oct, 2017 from U.S.
Thanks for reminding me I have a dentist appointment at 2:30kbaccki wrote:Sortooth?
As in: I had the dentist take a look at my sortooth?
Don't feed the gators,y'all
https://m.soundcloud.com/tonedeadj
https://m.soundcloud.com/tonedeadj
- KVRAF
- 2110 posts since 5 Oct, 2015 from Swedish / Living in Hong Kong
Sounds like fun! 30min suffering and in the end slapped with juicy billmelomood wrote:Thanks for reminding me I have a dentist appointment at 2:30kbaccki wrote:Sortooth?
As in: I had the dentist take a look at my sortooth?
Win 10 -64bit, CPU i7-7700K, 32Gb, Focusrite 2i2, FL-studio 20, Studio One 4, Reason 10
- KVRAF
- 2726 posts since 2 Jun, 2016
For the record, my comment about how to pronounce sawtooth correctly was intended purely as help.
Anyone can see from my other fair comments during that post (and also my profile, if you wish) exactly the spirit in which that advice was stated.
I speak and write intermediate Japanese (as well as native English) - I would want someone to point out any spoken or written 日本語 errors I make.
As such, yes the OP has an accent (as we all do) but I'm sure he'd prefer to know how to say a word in the way that (nearly) everyone else says it.
However, the point about pronunciation wasn't supposed to dominate this thread! My main point about the OP's video came above it in my post.
Anyone can see from my other fair comments during that post (and also my profile, if you wish) exactly the spirit in which that advice was stated.
I speak and write intermediate Japanese (as well as native English) - I would want someone to point out any spoken or written 日本語 errors I make.
As such, yes the OP has an accent (as we all do) but I'm sure he'd prefer to know how to say a word in the way that (nearly) everyone else says it.
However, the point about pronunciation wasn't supposed to dominate this thread! My main point about the OP's video came above it in my post.
- Beware the Quoth
- 35500 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
But that was the point of Jace's post. Nearly everyone doesnt say it with the intrusive r. The OP's own accent is effectively as valid as the intrusive r you're recommending.dark water wrote:As such, yes the OP has an accent (as we all do) but I'm sure he'd prefer to know how to say a word in the way that (nearly) everyone else says it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/voices/yourvoice/l ... nge3.shtml
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
