KVR Audio

fforet · Post by **fforet** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:18 pm

scientists found out that nanoloop is the best sounding DAW
but remember only when using the DMG-01 hardware synthesizer sequencer

gnu23 · Post by **gnu23** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:23 pm

Wavetone wrote:
dark water wrote:The best sounding DAW is also the only one which makes a noise:

Sonar.

One ping only, please..

Michael L · Post by **Michael L** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:29 pm

fforet wrote:scientists found out that nanoloop is the best sounding DAW

Well, here's the best-sounding DAW that makes no sound, because nanoloops are shorter than all audible wavelengths of sound. Even pings.

ATN69 · Post by **ATN69** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:35 pm

Best sounding DAW? ..well, that would depend on who is using it

A good set of speakers would also be helpful to make it sound good

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:36 pm

What i actually rather wonder is why software synthesizers sound so differently, and, why there is that distinctive sound of the sound engines. E.g. Synapse's synths all sound similar, u-he's synths do too, and Spire has a special touch too. In Spire you both hear that in the filters, and in the phaser, there's some kind of "creaminess" i hear in most sound demos of the Virus too. Let's just say that they obviously do some kind of internal processing which alters the sound, hence one sound engine won't sound the same as another. Of course, that all won't hold true for DAW's, because, obviously, you don't want the sound to sound and feel "processed" there.

Michael L · Post by **Michael L** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:46 pm

Doesn't the sound of a synth just reflect the musical taste of an individual designer?

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:48 pm

Sure does.

fforet · Post by **fforet** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:06 pm

Michael L wrote:Well, here's the best-sounding DAW that makes no sound, because nanoloops are shorter than all audible wavelengths of sound. Even pings.

that is not correct without defining a unit. how long is a loop for you?
nano is just a prefix for 10 to the (edit: minus) 9th

Woodgardens · Post by **Woodgardens** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:20 pm

10 exp -9

Michael L · Post by **Michael L** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:39 pm

So, a nano-24-hour-loop is about one wave cycle at 10kHz; the wavelength of the loop is 34,000km.

fforet · Post by **fforet** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:47 pm

Michael L wrote:So, a nano-24-hour-loop is about one wave cycle at 10kHz

now we are getting somewhere

i am happy to have this covered
now and then I enjoy higher education quality smartass conversations

Michael L · Post by **Michael L** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:54 pm

Its the antidote to black friday

fforet · Post by **fforet** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:05 pm

chk071 wrote:What i actually rather wonder is why software synthesizers sound so differently, and, why there is that distinctive sound of the sound engines.

why? isnt this always a matter of how a software is coded or how an instrument is built? if you change the case material or form of your guitar,piano,whatever it will sound different.

daws wont probably better with pine wood , cause their function is to output audio at an exactly defined audio file format.

stardustmedia · Post by **stardustmedia** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:11 pm

whyterabbyt wrote:
solomute wrote: Of course daws sound different....

bla bla bla bla bla...
more bla bla bla bla
even more bla bla bla
bla bla bla continues ...

(cropped, translated and summed up by stardustmedia)
your theory is cock.

@whyterabbyt:

your post just made my day

fforet · Post by **fforet** » Tue Nov 28, 2017 3:16 pm

Michael L wrote:Its the antidote to black friday

haha

so bad that you need an antidode? then lets keep talking about this truly important subject.

tbh I havent noticed much here or just dont care

What is the best sounding DAW??