Hi there,
I'm writng because I don't understand what I'm testing about the relationship Mono Mixdown and Pan Law.
DAW : Cubase 7
Test Source : -6dB Sine wave (Mono, Panned to Center)
Test 1) Project Pan Law : 0dB
With this pan law. mono sine wave that is panned center is not attenuated at all.
So, both channels (L,R) on the mono track have -6dB sine wave respectively.
After all, what I got through Mono Mixdown was 0dB Sine wave (Mono).
-6dB Sine wave (Mono) -> -6dB(L) + -6dB(R) -> (Mono Mixdown) -> 0dB Sine wave (Mono)
Test 2) Project Pan Law : -6dB
Contrary to the above, -6dB pan law attenuates the mono channel by 6dB when it’s panned to center.
So, both channels (L.R) on the mono track have -12dB sine wave respectively.
Then I had to get -6dB Sine wave, but I got -12 dB Sine wave.
I expected :
-6dB Sine wave (Mono) -> -12dB(L) + -12dB(R) -> (Mono Mixdown) -> -6dB Sine wave (Mono)
Actual results are :
-6dB Sine wave (Mono) -> -12dB(L) + -12dB(R) -> (Mono Mixdown) -> -12dB Sine wave (Mono)
The result of the Test 2 is not understood.
Isn't the principle of Mono Mixdown summing L+R?
The relationship between Mono Mixdown and Pan Law
-
- KVRer
- 1 posts since 4 Dec, 2017
-
- KVRist
- 267 posts since 2 Nov, 2015
- KVRian
- 1325 posts since 6 Mar, 2001 from London, UK
That's the bit I don't believe. The electrical summation of two identical signals causes an increase in amplitude of 6dB. Adding -12dB to an identical -12dB results in -6dB in any physical electrical system.pdtakeitslow wrote: Actual results are :
-6dB Sine wave (Mono) -> -12dB(L) + -12dB(R) -> (Mono Mixdown) -> -12dB Sine wave (Mono)
- KVRian
- 1325 posts since 6 Mar, 2001 from London, UK
Thinking on, a -12dB mono signal panned through to stereo under -6 pan law would have an amplitude of -18dB and two such signals would sum, in the center of the stereo field, to -12dB.