Poll: Which DAW interface do you find lets you get the job done quickest?
-
- KVRAF
- 2140 posts since 16 Jan, 2013 from USA
If I missed one, vote for it in a reply. I started another thread that explains the purpose of this poll and for the discussion.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=497014
Please read that before making comments.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=497014
Please read that before making comments.
Last edited by jonljacobi on Sun Dec 24, 2017 12:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
- KVRAF
- 1787 posts since 22 Feb, 2014
For me, it depends on the job. I read a review just yesterday (honest!) with a paragraph written by a kindred spirit. Here's the quote:
https://bedroomproducersblog.com/2016/0 ... o-8-review
But I can also see the other side, where having too many choices becomes overwhelming and causes analysis paralysis, AND/OR you end up spending a bunch of time trying to figure out how to integrate disparate systems instead of creating.
bpb wrote:This is the landscape of the modern DAW era: endless choices. Regardless of your profession, hobby, or process, there is a DAW out there for you. In fact, many of us have found there are multiple suitable DAWs for us to use and, instead of compromising in order to limit ourselves to a single program, we use their various strengths for different parts of our creative process. For example, I might sketch a new project in Maschine, mix it in Logic, and perform live using Ableton. Breaking up your music making process into various stages will also allow you to integrate different pieces of software more easily into your workflow. Restricting yourself to only one DAW means that you might be missing out on important features of other applications, and thus limiting your creative process.
https://bedroomproducersblog.com/2016/0 ... o-8-review
But I can also see the other side, where having too many choices becomes overwhelming and causes analysis paralysis, AND/OR you end up spending a bunch of time trying to figure out how to integrate disparate systems instead of creating.
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
-
- KVRian
- 536 posts since 26 Mar, 2014
Most efficient at what?
Making a song, Reaper.
Sound design, Bitwig.
Frustrating me because the fonts are ridiculously small on windows 10, DP9.
Working on linux, Reaper and Bitwig.
Working with a friend who uses Cubase, then Cubase.
And so on and on and ... etc.
Daws are tools, people use what is most comfortable for them, polls like this are pointless.
What works for me probably wont work for some others and yet will work for others.
What does it matter who uses what, make your own minds up.
Dont be a sheep and follow others, its stupid.
Making a song, Reaper.
Sound design, Bitwig.
Frustrating me because the fonts are ridiculously small on windows 10, DP9.
Working on linux, Reaper and Bitwig.
Working with a friend who uses Cubase, then Cubase.
And so on and on and ... etc.
Daws are tools, people use what is most comfortable for them, polls like this are pointless.
What works for me probably wont work for some others and yet will work for others.
What does it matter who uses what, make your own minds up.
Dont be a sheep and follow others, its stupid.
Mac mini m4 pro, Reaper, too many plugins, Modal Argon8, Novation Circuit Mono Station and now a lovely Waldorf Blofeld.
-
- KVRist
- 70 posts since 29 May, 2016
Hey!
Hex is cool
Don't be a fool
Hexadecimal icious
it rules!
100000000100000000 reasons to rule em all!
RENOISE !!!!!!!!!!!!
Hex is cool
Don't be a fool
Hexadecimal icious
it rules!
100000000100000000 reasons to rule em all!
RENOISE !!!!!!!!!!!!
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
- KVRAF
- 1787 posts since 22 Feb, 2014
It's the holidays, so can we not argue and beat up the OP?Kypresso wrote:Most efficient at what?
Daws are tools, people use what is most comfortable for them, polls like this are pointless.
What works for me probably wont work for some others and yet will work for others.
What does it matter who uses what, make your own minds up.
Dont be a sheep and follow others, its stupid.
He's just trying to tap the 'wisdom of the crowd' like many others here. People don't come here for fellowship, do they?
-
- KVRian
- 536 posts since 26 Mar, 2014
If you want fellowship, go and get your likes on facebook or some other crappy social media site.telecharge wrote:It's the holidays, so can we not argue and beat up the OP?Kypresso wrote:Most efficient at what?
Daws are tools, people use what is most comfortable for them, polls like this are pointless.
What works for me probably wont work for some others and yet will work for others.
What does it matter who uses what, make your own minds up.
Dont be a sheep and follow others, its stupid.![]()
He's just trying to tap the 'wisdom of the crowd' like many others here. People don't come here for fellowship, do they?
I'm not trying to argue and beat anyone up, just being honest as i see it.
I use a Nektar Panorama P6 keyboard/controller, this gives me great integration with Reaper and Bitwig which makes both of them very efficient for me. Now someone else using Reaper or Bitwig without that deep integration may decide that Studio One is more efficient for them.
Does that make Reaper/Bitwig or Studio One more efficient?
If i want to do some sound design, then Bitwig 2 with its new modulators is what i would use in preference to Reaper.
Someone trying to record a rock band probably wouldn't choose Live or Bitwig.
So to sum up, its context that helps you to choose, what is most efficient depends on what you are going to do and how you are going to use it, its not a fixed choice based on how many other people use any particular daw.
Mac mini m4 pro, Reaper, too many plugins, Modal Argon8, Novation Circuit Mono Station and now a lovely Waldorf Blofeld.
- KVRAF
- 7872 posts since 21 Dec, 2002 from MD USA
Studio One because the first time I tried it everything just worked exactly how I thought it should. Extremely intuitive for me.
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
-
Spencer Maddox Spencer Maddox https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=406543
- KVRian
- 814 posts since 19 Oct, 2017 from The Empire State
Its kinda weird with me. The two daws I use the Most are Ableton and Bitwig.
I work faster in bitwig then ableton, But I enjoy the UI of ableton 10 more...If that makes any sense
I work faster in bitwig then ableton, But I enjoy the UI of ableton 10 more...If that makes any sense
The post above this is likely bait, viewer discretion is advised.
- KVRAF
- 1929 posts since 23 Sep, 2005
Studio One Pro 3.5 
-
- KVRAF
- 3496 posts since 30 Dec, 2014
Back in day when I first heard of Studio One (2009) I was primarily a Reason user which remained the case up until Nov 2014 so I didn't just immediately switch to Studio One, there wasn't any particular need to but what I did find immediately noticeable, was it's friendly, elegant and simplistic but cosy environment. I couldn't explain why at the time, it just had something about it. It's lack of instruments, a proper synth for example and limited set of other instruments, and programmability was why I didn't jump onboard I think from the outset. It was always in the back of my mind though as a possibility in the future if more meat and potatoes was added in a future release however.
I thought I'd end up with FL Studio, but really it's system of working was just always weird to me.
Bitwig was interesting but infuriating GUI wise where things I wanted to move couldn't.
Cubase...too expensive.
Reaper, a bloated mess of complexity, archaic design and no meat and bones.
Sonar, too many bad previous experiences to even consider.
Renoise, been there in the 1990's and done that, wasn't keen going that route again.
Magix Samplitude, too budget consumerist focused.
Abelton Live, hated the flat interface design, weird workflow and buggyness.
And the others, I didn't spend much time thinking about if at all..
I thought I'd end up with FL Studio, but really it's system of working was just always weird to me.
Bitwig was interesting but infuriating GUI wise where things I wanted to move couldn't.
Cubase...too expensive.
Reaper, a bloated mess of complexity, archaic design and no meat and bones.
Sonar, too many bad previous experiences to even consider.
Renoise, been there in the 1990's and done that, wasn't keen going that route again.
Magix Samplitude, too budget consumerist focused.
Abelton Live, hated the flat interface design, weird workflow and buggyness.
And the others, I didn't spend much time thinking about if at all..
KVR S1-Thread | The Intrancersonic-Design Source > Program Resource | Studio One Resource | Music Gallery | 2D / 3D Sci-fi Art | GUI Projects | Animations | Photography | Film Docs | 80's Cartoons | Games | Music Hardware |
-
- KVRAF
- 5144 posts since 3 Oct, 2013
most important was for me is the StayFocusd Chrome extension
"StayFocusd increases your productivity by limiting the amount of time that you can spend on time-wasting websites."
it can boost the speed of any DAW dramatically
"StayFocusd increases your productivity by limiting the amount of time that you can spend on time-wasting websites."
it can boost the speed of any DAW dramatically
"Where we're workarounding, we don't NEED features." - powermat