Bitwig or Live?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Eno uses Logic. Which I thought was cool til I realized the choice is meaningless.

Post

Mozart used Live, right?

Post

zerocrossing wrote:
I just went from Live 9 to Bitwig 2. I’m still getting used to it, but I’m glad I made the change. Bitwig is perfect for using MPE compatable controllers, which is huge for me. I love my Roli Rise. That’s the main reason I switched, but now I find I don’t have to run my old plugins in jBridge, so that’s a bonus, and Bitwig’s modulation system was so good, I ended up selling my Deepmind 12 because now I can use my Tetras (or any hardware our software instrument) to do the types of sounds that I was using the Deepmind for. The Deepmind has really good effects integration, meaning you can do things like assign an LFO or Velocity to an effect parameter. Now I just do that with Bitwig and audio plugins like the Soundtoys bundle. I could do things like this in Live, but it was super clunky and often either involved M4L or tricky use of clips. How Bitwig handels this is brilliant.
+1 and +1 again :wink:

Post

toonertik wrote:
Kinh wrote: My only regret is it took me to 2014 to find it, so the 4 years before then was WASTED in protools and others. I would be a star now if I stumbled on it sooner, a f#cking star! I do not doubt that... When you're creating contemporary music EVERYTHING is the tools you are using. Great tools = great music. This is not merely a theory, it's fact. The greatest tool is Ableton. Everyone will tell you that. Logic and cubase are a close second. Research what the top producers in the world are using.
Wow... I wonder how all the stars that have used ProTools and other DAWs have managed to become stars with out the use of Live...

Oh I know>>> TALENT!!!!!!

BTW, I have heard real stars produce magical music even without the best tools (compared to today's tools)... think Frank Zappa... Beatles... Ella Fitzgerald... omg the list is so long.
Talking about tools>>>>
:lol:
I'm gonna give you 10c so you can buy yourself a sense of humor. :dog:

Post

tooneba wrote:Mozart used Live, right?
Actually, that's a common misconception. He used a kinetically controlled over-the-air protocol to connect to wetware instrument hosts, each of which utilized an isolated amplification scheme tailored to their hosted plugin. It was all powered by these crazy complex power convertors that used organic chemistry. He was totally ahead of his time.

Post

Wow. I always thought he played piano

Post

thecontrolcentre wrote:Wow. I always thought he played piano
no, he was a fraud. Everyone knows that he couldn't have been a genius because all that music theory knowledge would just clog his creative ability. So probably an early example of work by minions al'a HZ.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer

Post

SJ_Digriz wrote:no, he was a fraud. Everyone knows that he couldn't have been a genius because all that music theory knowledge would just clog his creative ability. So probably an early example of work by minions al'a HZ.
Besides, he used too many notes.


Post

one of my favorite scenes from one of my favorite movies ;)
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”