No, Repro-1 is monophonic. That's why there's Repro-5, to have a polyphonic version.jbarish wrote:is there an option somewhere in Repro-1 to make it polyphonic?? I couldn't find one. If not, that would be a welcome addition.
u-he Repro (Repro-1 & Repro-5) released
-
- KVRAF
- 22873 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
-
- KVRAF
- 22873 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
No it's not. It's extremely close. Some FX have been left out of the poly version and this has all been explained by Urs.jbarish wrote:repro-5 is NOT the same as a polyphonic Repro-1.
Point is, Repro-1 is the way it is for a reason. If you want a poly Repro-1, you're not getting it. The closest you're getting is Repro-5.
Repro-1 is not going to be changed because people want a polyphonic version. It isn't happening.
-
- KVRAF
- 7872 posts since 21 Dec, 2002 from MD USA
wagtunes wrote:No it's not. It's extremely close. Some FX have been left out of the poly version and this has all been explained by Urs.jbarish wrote:repro-5 is NOT the same as a polyphonic Repro-1.
Point is, Repro-1 is the way it is for a reason. If you want a poly Repro-1, you're not getting it. The closest you're getting is Repro-5.
Repro-1 is not going to be changed because people want a polyphonic version. It isn't happening.
they don't really sound at all alike to me.
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
-
- KVRAF
- 22873 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
You're kidding right? Take away all the FX and it's practically the same synth. Urs himself will tell you that. Any differences are minute.ATS wrote:wagtunes wrote:No it's not. It's extremely close. Some FX have been left out of the poly version and this has all been explained by Urs.jbarish wrote:repro-5 is NOT the same as a polyphonic Repro-1.
Point is, Repro-1 is the way it is for a reason. If you want a poly Repro-1, you're not getting it. The closest you're getting is Repro-5.
Repro-1 is not going to be changed because people want a polyphonic version. It isn't happening.
they don't really sound at all alike to me.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
Use one instance per midi channel.....now you have a polyphonic Repro-1.jbarish wrote:repro-5 is NOT the same as a polyphonic Repro-1.
But i can say that it is not great to play that polyphonic. Too dominant, levels had to be taken down and JAWS kills your CPU and ears.
Repro-5 is the way to go here.
But i would like to have the sequencer in Repro-5 for sure.
-
- KVRAF
- 7872 posts since 21 Dec, 2002 from MD USA
wagtunes wrote:You're kidding right? Take away all the FX and it's practically the same synth. Urs himself will tell you that. Any differences are minute.ATS wrote:wagtunes wrote:No it's not. It's extremely close. Some FX have been left out of the poly version and this has all been explained by Urs.jbarish wrote:repro-5 is NOT the same as a polyphonic Repro-1.
Point is, Repro-1 is the way it is for a reason. If you want a poly Repro-1, you're not getting it. The closest you're getting is Repro-5.
Repro-1 is not going to be changed because people want a polyphonic version. It isn't happening.
they don't really sound at all alike to me.
nope not kidding, why would I be?
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali
-
- KVRAF
- 22873 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Well, then I honestly don't know what you're hearing.ATS wrote:wagtunes wrote:You're kidding right? Take away all the FX and it's practically the same synth. Urs himself will tell you that. Any differences are minute.ATS wrote:wagtunes wrote:No it's not. It's extremely close. Some FX have been left out of the poly version and this has all been explained by Urs.jbarish wrote:repro-5 is NOT the same as a polyphonic Repro-1.
Point is, Repro-1 is the way it is for a reason. If you want a poly Repro-1, you're not getting it. The closest you're getting is Repro-5.
Repro-1 is not going to be changed because people want a polyphonic version. It isn't happening.
they don't really sound at all alike to me.
nope not kidding, why would I be?
-
- KVRAF
- 2066 posts since 11 Aug, 2012 from omfr morf form romf frmo
RePro-5 doesn't have the wavefolder, though. Which is great for mono leads, comps, basses, drones. I understand the feeling of being hobbled but you are missing out some perfect use cases. But if that's not your playing/production style then okay.fluffy_little_something wrote:I have both demo versions and frankly, I hardly ever open Repro 1 as I don't like monophonic synths. Repro 5 even has the oscillators of Repro 1 on the tweaks page if necessary. Set the voices parameter to 1 and it is monophonic as well.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
Don´t forget to have a look at the tweak page since they have different settings (OSC, Filter) there as default. And that can make a huge change.ATS wrote:wagtunes wrote:You're kidding right? Take away all the FX and it's practically the same synth. Urs himself will tell you that. Any differences are minute.ATS wrote:wagtunes wrote:No it's not. It's extremely close. Some FX have been left out of the poly version and this has all been explained by Urs.jbarish wrote:repro-5 is NOT the same as a polyphonic Repro-1.
Point is, Repro-1 is the way it is for a reason. If you want a poly Repro-1, you're not getting it. The closest you're getting is Repro-5.
Repro-1 is not going to be changed because people want a polyphonic version. It isn't happening.
they don't really sound at all alike to me.
nope not kidding, why would I be?
Otherwise they have the same FX. Just JAWS is made for mono and Repro-5 distortion is polyphonic. And Repro-5 has that nice Velvet on top which is like Satin in a box.
-
- KVRAF
- 24405 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
wagtunes wrote:Well, then I honestly don't know what you're hearing.ATS wrote:wagtunes wrote:You're kidding right? Take away all the FX and it's practically the same synth. Urs himself will tell you that. Any differences are minute.ATS wrote:wagtunes wrote:No it's not. It's extremely close. Some FX have been left out of the poly version and this has all been explained by Urs.jbarish wrote:repro-5 is NOT the same as a polyphonic Repro-1.
Point is, Repro-1 is the way it is for a reason. If you want a poly Repro-1, you're not getting it. The closest you're getting is Repro-5.
Repro-1 is not going to be changed because people want a polyphonic version. It isn't happening.
they don't really sound at all alike to me.
nope not kidding, why would I be?
Repro-1 has wider modulation ranges than Repro-5. Has some modulations that Repro-5 doesn't have. They don't sound EXACTLY the same because of those things, as a consequence Repro-1 can create wilder sounds than Repro-5.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 4066 posts since 22 Aug, 2012
I think someone previously mentioned that the hardware Pro-One had different gain staging to the Prophet-5 and therefore had a punchier sound. Not sure whether that was translated in Repro models.
-
- KVRAF
- 24405 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
That's true as well.
-
- u-he
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin