
Roland JV-1080 finally, as virtual instrument!
- KVRAF
- 7788 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater
Autosampling away.


Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
- KVRAF
- 3846 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from Underworld
Well, Roland has finally decided to join the VSTi world. Impressive. About time.
It took them only like 15 years to realise they should do it. 
I wonder what were their CEOs thinking? "It's just a fad, it'll pass"?
All whilst Korg made a really nice and very successful VSTis that I love. All of them are still extremely useful and sound great.
Anyway, what I actually wanted to say is: this is really huge! And I almost bought a JV-1080 just a couple of months ago... with a Vintage Expansion. The reason being I don't own any Roland ROMplers currently and I've always found them rather inspiring and sounding great in their own right. Jupiter-4 and D-10 were my first real synths... [after Yamaha PSS-680 kid's crap]
Thank you Ingonator and Beely for posting really interesting things. You're the only reason I went through this thread all the way from page one.
I wonder what were their CEOs thinking? "It's just a fad, it'll pass"?
Anyway, what I actually wanted to say is: this is really huge! And I almost bought a JV-1080 just a couple of months ago... with a Vintage Expansion. The reason being I don't own any Roland ROMplers currently and I've always found them rather inspiring and sounding great in their own right. Jupiter-4 and D-10 were my first real synths... [after Yamaha PSS-680 kid's crap]
Thank you Ingonator and Beely for posting really interesting things. You're the only reason I went through this thread all the way from page one.
It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. - Jiddu Krishnamurti
- KVRist
- 356 posts since 24 Dec, 2015
So the VST has 22 FXs that are not in the XV. The XV has 35 that aren't in the VST. Both have 55 FXs in common...
Good luck beely. Looks like a real puzzle.
Now I wonder why Roland chose to add Fantom's MFX in the plugin instead of the ones in the XV.
Good luck beely. Looks like a real puzzle.
Now I wonder why Roland chose to add Fantom's MFX in the plugin instead of the ones in the XV.
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- Banned
- 6787 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
The integra has even fewer effects , 67 in total ( missing the super filter , and a bunch of others ).sinemotor wrote:So the VST has 22 FXs that are not in the XV. The XV has 35 that aren't in the VST. Both have 55 FXs in common...
Good luck beely. Looks like a real puzzle.
Now I wonder why Roland chose to add Fantom's MFX in the plugin instead of the ones in the XV.
Limited pitch shift algo's ( only 1 ) and no global effects
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
- KVRAF
- 6466 posts since 18 Jul, 2008 from New York
Why? Is the plan to grab the presets you like and cancel the cloud subscription?djanthonyw wrote:Autosampling away.![]()
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Roland always did some questionable and difficult to understand options with their launchingsgentleclockdivider wrote:The integra has even fewer effects , 67 in total ( missing the super filter , and a bunch of others ).sinemotor wrote:So the VST has 22 FXs that are not in the XV. The XV has 35 that aren't in the VST. Both have 55 FXs in common...
Good luck beely. Looks like a real puzzle.
Now I wonder why Roland chose to add Fantom's MFX in the plugin instead of the ones in the XV.
Limited pitch shift algo's ( only 1 ) and no global effects
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 7788 posts since 20 Jul, 2004 from Clearwater
Free trial, so no cancelation necessary.Frantz wrote:Why? Is the plan to grab the presets you like and cancel the cloud subscription?djanthonyw wrote:Autosampling away.![]()
I refuse pay via subscription. I'd buy it if they offered a perpetual license though.
Wavsen.com - Professional mix delivery platform with client approval, watermarking, and portfolio page builder.
-
- KVRAF
- 2648 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
Don't think the most of the presets are so great that I would bother sampling. It's mostly regular variety of rompler stuff.
This synth has mostly value in programming your own patches or modifying the existing ones.
This synth has mostly value in programming your own patches or modifying the existing ones.
No signature here!
- KVRAF
- 24411 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
They do, after 12 months of subscription you can get one plugin forever.djanthonyw wrote:I'd buy it if they offered a perpetual license though.
-
- KVRAF
- 2648 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
It's still going to be cloud only in a sense that it needs constant internet connection and all the cloud trash.EvilDragon wrote:They do, after 12 months of subscription you can get one plugin forever.djanthonyw wrote:I'd buy it if they offered a perpetual license though.
No signature here!
- KVRAF
- 3034 posts since 6 Jul, 2013
Ok, I've been having a survey of the FX settings between the XV-5080 presets and the plugin.
Looking at the first four banks on the XV-5080, which are the same (with some minor changes) between the 5080 and the plugin:-
PA-A 4 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PA-B 4 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PA-C 6 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PA-D 8 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
Looking at those same patches in the plugin, we can see that the following FX substitutions have been made:
MFX 7 XV -> MFX 8 plugin
MFX 5 XV -> MFX 2 plugin
MFX 23 XV -> MFX 61 plugin
MFX 38 XV -> MFX 46 plugin
So these algorithms, despite having different numbers and/or names, are still the same algorithms, or do the same job. I expect there will be more of these MFX substitutions, which I can figure out on a case by case basis.
The remainder of the preset patch banks on the XV-5080 check out as follows:
PR-E 8 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PR-F 4 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PR-G 39 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
USER 26 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
Many of these patches are the same MFX substitutions noted above (so they will work fine in the plugin), but there are other MFX used as well. I expect most will be able to make the conversion without too many sound differences, but there may be a few patches where it's not possible to sound the same in the plugin. In the conversion, I'll do my best to substitute the MFX to keep things sounding as intended, but where it's not possible (should that be the case) then there will be a warning for the affected patches saying something like "Patch XX MFX cannot be recreated in the plugin - may sound different" or something similar.
In any case, there should be a decent number of extra XV-5080 patches that should work in the plugin, even if a small handful don't sound the same, to make the job worthwhile.
I alo have a Fantom preset bank for the XV-5080, which I haven't assessed for FX yet - and there likely shouldn't be any problem with the MFX with the original JV-1080 sysex files...
Looking at the first four banks on the XV-5080, which are the same (with some minor changes) between the 5080 and the plugin:-
PA-A 4 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PA-B 4 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PA-C 6 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PA-D 8 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
Looking at those same patches in the plugin, we can see that the following FX substitutions have been made:
MFX 7 XV -> MFX 8 plugin
MFX 5 XV -> MFX 2 plugin
MFX 23 XV -> MFX 61 plugin
MFX 38 XV -> MFX 46 plugin
So these algorithms, despite having different numbers and/or names, are still the same algorithms, or do the same job. I expect there will be more of these MFX substitutions, which I can figure out on a case by case basis.
The remainder of the preset patch banks on the XV-5080 check out as follows:
PR-E 8 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PR-F 4 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
PR-G 39 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
USER 26 out of 128 patches use FX "missing" in the plugin
Many of these patches are the same MFX substitutions noted above (so they will work fine in the plugin), but there are other MFX used as well. I expect most will be able to make the conversion without too many sound differences, but there may be a few patches where it's not possible to sound the same in the plugin. In the conversion, I'll do my best to substitute the MFX to keep things sounding as intended, but where it's not possible (should that be the case) then there will be a warning for the affected patches saying something like "Patch XX MFX cannot be recreated in the plugin - may sound different" or something similar.
In any case, there should be a decent number of extra XV-5080 patches that should work in the plugin, even if a small handful don't sound the same, to make the job worthwhile.
I alo have a Fantom preset bank for the XV-5080, which I haven't assessed for FX yet - and there likely shouldn't be any problem with the MFX with the original JV-1080 sysex files...
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
OK guys. Here are the links to download the banks I collected from the net, so far. Several are already converted for the JV-1080, while there are others that come from the JV-80 (many, surprisingly - seems the JV-80 was also very popular) and they are converted already, but I'm not sure of for the JV-1090 or for the Fantom-X. There si also a collection from the XV-3080 (although I presume that one will not differ much from the one of the XV-5080 that beely already have).
There may be some dups, although I tried to organize them and avoid that.
EDIT: I aggregated the different files per instrument, so that it makes less downloads, making things easier that way. They are small, anyway. Here are the new links:
Roland JV-80 converted to Fantom-X
Several Roland JV-1080 collections
Several Roland XP-50 collections
Roland XV-3080 ROMs A to F
There may be some dups, although I tried to organize them and avoid that.
EDIT: I aggregated the different files per instrument, so that it makes less downloads, making things easier that way. They are small, anyway. Here are the new links:
Roland JV-80 converted to Fantom-X
Several Roland JV-1080 collections
Several Roland XP-50 collections
Roland XV-3080 ROMs A to F
Last edited by fmr on Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:36 pm, edited 7 times in total.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 3034 posts since 6 Jul, 2013
That's great, cheers Fernando...
Will download and take a look!
In response to the earlier conversation about Performance mode I took another look at what the XV-5080 offers here.
There are only two preset Performance banks, A and B, of 32 entries each. Bank A are all multitimbral sequencing templates, not very inspiring. Bank B is better - again, there are quite a few splits, but no really inspirational sounds, a few are ok.
The XV factory user bank (programmed for the 5080 directly) though fares better - there are 64 Performances here, and these sounds are in general much better and more inspirational. If I get time I may look at transferring these across to equivalent DAW-specific setups (eg, Logic layered Patches, Ableton Live racks etc) using multiple instances of the plugin to recreate them.
But that's a little way down my list of priorities, so we'll see...
Will download and take a look!
In response to the earlier conversation about Performance mode I took another look at what the XV-5080 offers here.
There are only two preset Performance banks, A and B, of 32 entries each. Bank A are all multitimbral sequencing templates, not very inspiring. Bank B is better - again, there are quite a few splits, but no really inspirational sounds, a few are ok.
The XV factory user bank (programmed for the 5080 directly) though fares better - there are 64 Performances here, and these sounds are in general much better and more inspirational. If I get time I may look at transferring these across to equivalent DAW-specific setups (eg, Logic layered Patches, Ableton Live racks etc) using multiple instances of the plugin to recreate them.
But that's a little way down my list of priorities, so we'll see...
- KVRAF
- 5110 posts since 5 May, 2005 from Stockholm, Sweden
Ironically, their plugins look like they were coded 15 years ago.DuX wrote:Well, Roland has finally decided to join the VSTi world. Impressive. About time.It took them only like 15 years to realise they should do it.
![]()
