It was automatic when I downloaded. I believe it only works on machines recent enough to support Metal. It is very pretty though.aMUSEd wrote:How do you download the Alchemy and Reverb patches?
Also I thought the reverb was supposed to have some sort of fancy visualization but I can't see it - how do you turn it on?
Logic Pro v10.4 is out
-
jacqueslacouth jacqueslacouth https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=48379
- KVRian
- 1149 posts since 18 Nov, 2004
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 7985 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
Not that it matters really, but have any go you noticed that cpu performance in the last 6-8 years really hasn't increased at the level it did for years before then? 'm running a modded 09 Mac Pro that's easily in the running with the latest top of the line build from apple. Same with the 2012 MacBook pro here, it's still competitive performance wise. Looking at scores in Geekbench it's brutally expensive servers that are beating older top of the line PCs and Macs.el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:Did you also come back here in a Delorian to ensure your great, great, grandparents fell in love?Bodhisan wrote:I’m running latest with Sierra on a late 2112 Mac Mini - less than $500.
My point is that was a good argument against older computers for years but chips are not getting 1 1/2 X faster every couple years like they used to, and i7's aren't getting into competition with Xeons for ridiculous amounts of cores. The Xeons out now that destroy older Xeons and i7's are not in any of our price ranges.
Before making any decisions about purchasing computers these days IMO Geekbench is your friend, and it definitely backs up what I'm saying here. My 2012 2.7 has a score of 12039, the latest MacBook 3.1 top of the line is only 15634, a whole 23% faster in 6 years.
- KVRAF
- 37383 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Crap - oh well it sounds OK but nothing I don't already havejacqueslacouth wrote:It was automatic when I downloaded. I believe it only works on machines recent enough to support Metal. It is very pretty though.aMUSEd wrote:How do you download the Alchemy and Reverb patches?
Also I thought the reverb was supposed to have some sort of fancy visualization but I can't see it - how do you turn it on?
- KVRAF
- 37383 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
The new Alchemy patches are amazingly good - many made by biomechanoid by the sound of it
-
Winstontaneous Winstontaneous https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98336
- KVRAF
- 2591 posts since 15 Feb, 2006 from Another Green World
I know you're talking about CPU speed but IMO another factor contributing to things not being as fast as we'd expect - 64 bit apps have let developers become very lazy around memory management. The limits I keep hitting with my 2012 MBP are not CPU speed-related - they're memory and thermal. A whining 6200RPM fan is not conducive to recording with sensitive condenser mics in the same room.
machinesworking wrote:Not that it matters really, but have any go you noticed that cpu performance in the last 6-8 years really hasn't increased at the level it did for years before then? 'm running a modded 09 Mac Pro that's easily in the running with the latest top of the line build from apple. Same with the 2012 MacBook pro here, it's still competitive performance wise. Looking at scores in Geekbench it's brutally expensive servers that are beating older top of the line PCs and Macs.el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:Did you also come back here in a Delorian to ensure your great, great, grandparents fell in love?Bodhisan wrote:I’m running latest with Sierra on a late 2112 Mac Mini - less than $500.
My point is that was a good argument against older computers for years but chips are not getting 1 1/2 X faster every couple years like they used to, and i7's aren't getting into competition with Xeons for ridiculous amounts of cores. The Xeons out now that destroy older Xeons and i7's are not in any of our price ranges.
Before making any decisions about purchasing computers these days IMO Geekbench is your friend, and it definitely backs up what I'm saying here. My 2012 2.7 has a score of 12039, the latest MacBook 3.1 top of the line is only 15634, a whole 23% faster in 6 years.
- KVRAF
- 11950 posts since 31 Aug, 2013 from Someplace else
Here is a pretty good idea of how the new horn section works, although he seemed to have trouble with a couple of articulations. Amazing. Realistic, imo.
And FREEEEE!
And FREEEEE!
“The Generals sat, and the lines on the map, moved from side to side.”
― Pink Floyd
― Pink Floyd
- KVRAF
- 37383 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
2 plugins the au manager is saying it can't open now -XILS Oxium and Noveltech Character
-
- KVRist
- 144 posts since 31 Jan, 2017
Been noticing for a while, now, that performance improvements tend not to have too much of an impact on macOS/Windows/Ubuntu for general-purpose tasks. While it’s clear that devs aren’t really taking advantage of the increased speeds, they’re also not being so keen on optimization. So the fact that an older laptop without much RAM can get by with quite a few tasks with current software also means something about what counts as performance.Winstontaneous wrote:I know you're talking about CPU speed but IMO another factor contributing to things not being as fast as we'd expect - 64 bit apps have let developers become very lazy around memory management. The limits I keep hitting with my 2012 MBP are not CPU speed-related - they're memory and thermal. A whining 6200RPM fan is not conducive to recording with sensitive condenser mics in the same room.machinesworking wrote:Not that it matters really, but have any go you noticed that cpu performance in the last 6-8 years really hasn't increased at the level it did for years before then? 'm running a modded 09 Mac Pro that's easily in the running with the latest top of the line build from apple. Same with the 2012 MacBook pro here, it's still competitive performance wise. Looking at scores in Geekbench it's brutally expensive servers that are beating older top of the line PCs and Macs.el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:Did you also come back here in a Delorian to ensure your great, great, grandparents fell in love?Bodhisan wrote:I’m running latest with Sierra on a late 2112 Mac Mini - less than $500.
My point is that was a good argument against older computers for years but chips are not getting 1 1/2 X faster every couple years like they used to, and i7's aren't getting into competition with Xeons for ridiculous amounts of cores. The Xeons out now that destroy older Xeons and i7's are not in any of our price ranges.
Before making any decisions about purchasing computers these days IMO Geekbench is your friend, and it definitely backs up what I'm saying here. My 2012 2.7 has a score of 12039, the latest MacBook 3.1 top of the line is only 15634, a whole 23% faster in 6 years.
To me, the biggest performance difference on macOS and Windows, by a really long shot, has been a switch to SSD. Qualitative difference: pretty unusable with HD, quite decent with SSD.
One area where performance improvements are very noticeable is on iOS. Just today, switched from an iPad 4 to an iPad Pro and, similar to the SSD move, it’s a difference between barely usable and a seamless experience. Expected a significant difference but didn’t figure it’d be that obvious. RAM is obviously a big part but CPU also matters, here.
Another area where it’s been very easy to notice performance improvements is on the Raspberry Pi. Not only because the CPU in the Pi3 is a radical improvement but Raspbian has been so finely optimized that even the Raspberry Pi Zero runs better than before.
Of course, the connection between these two areas is obvious: ARM.
If the trend continues, with these ARM chips, we might go through an interesting transition. Apple probably won’t release macOS for ARM in the near future. But it’d be nice if they made a more professional version of iOS, with something closer to Logic Pro X (and/or MainStage) than GarageBand.
- KVRAF
- 11950 posts since 31 Aug, 2013 from Someplace else
Enkerli wrote:Whoa! Had only heard one silly example which didn’t sound so good but, to me as a sax player, this really sounds most excellent! Wow. Getting really excited, now.
Impressed me! I expect the new strings work the same way. I wonder if we'll get comparable quality instruments down the road!
“The Generals sat, and the lines on the map, moved from side to side.”
― Pink Floyd
― Pink Floyd
-
- KVRAF
- 2140 posts since 16 Jan, 2013 from USA
Haven't gotten to the strings yet, but the horns are impressive. Really impressive. I think this is my third email saying that. I'm simply delighted. I really hope they follow through on this with all the orchestral instruments.
That said, if I could afford to hire the real thing I would. Always.
That said, if I could afford to hire the real thing I would. Always.
-
- KVRist
- 139 posts since 26 Feb, 2016
I had the same problem with a couple of plugins. Just downloaded them again & re-installed & they worked fineaMUSEd wrote:2 plugins the au manager is saying it can't open now -XILS Oxium and Noveltech Character
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 7985 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
Yep, the 09 Mac Pro has newer HD's in it, running at 170-190mbs, (larger hard drives have better performance for some reason, so the 4TB HD is fast); the OS is on an XP941 running at 1100mbs, and the bigger sample libraries are on an SM951 running at 1450mbs. Smaller libraries are on USB3 connected external SSDs running at 340mbs. As far as RAM is concerned I rarely do huge orchestral stuff, so 24GB more than suffices. Mostly if I have issues with CPU it's due to loading a single track, at 12 cores and 24 possible threads, track count doesn't do anything to my CPU.Enkerli wrote: To me, the biggest performance difference on macOS and Windows, by a really long shot, has been a switch to SSD. Qualitative difference: pretty unusable with HD, quite decent with SSD.
I just don't foresee any reason to upgrade the mac until it's actually dying at this point. So IMO everyone has a very valid point about Apple Tax in regards to modern hardware, and this huge delay on their "modular" replacement for the trash cans, but in terms of having to abandon Logic because it's not running well on old hardware it's not much of a point.
- KVRAF
- 6113 posts since 7 Jan, 2005 from Corporate States of America