KVR Audio

george · Post by **george** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:24 am

WilliamK wrote:Please remove that now. Thank you.

I will change it as soon as the new version gets oficially released. It will keep displaying the actual resampling quality in the meanwhile.

WilliamK · Post by **WilliamK** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:24 am

WilliamK · Post by **WilliamK** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:26 am

intel · Post by **intel** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:27 am

I think I get it now....

no.. wait..

WilliamK · Post by **WilliamK** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:31 am

george · Post by **george** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:33 am

WilliamK wrote:For false-information.

Yeah, sure

intel · Post by **intel** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:44 am

george · Post by **george** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:45 am

WilliamK wrote:..

For those who missed it, Mr. William plans a lawsuit because of the "false-information" displayed on that page and my negative of removing current Wusikstation resampling engine analysis. Killing the site hosting that page was also stated.

Be aware discoDSP is not related with this, since it is an individual research done by myself (and other people who have collaborated by sending waves too), so he may have to sue me instead.

intel · Post by **intel** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:49 am

Warmonger · Post by **Warmonger** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 2:56 am

Aliasing introduces additional odd frequencies, and it doesn't sound good, as some people state.

I don't get it. Some people state that it doesn't sound good, or some people state that Aliasing introduces additional odd frequencies?

Okay, so I do actually get it, but the grammar of that sentence is unclear. Maybe it should be something like the following: "Aliasing introduces additional odd frequencies, which, contrary to what some people state, doesn't sound good."

edit: And you might want to remove the link to Tracktion's sampler until you get its updated graph.

george · Post by **george** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:01 am

Warmonger wrote:Okay, so I do actually get it, but the grammar of that sentence is unclear. Maybe it should be something like the following: "Aliasing introduces additional odd frequencies, which, contrary to what some people state, doesn't sound good."

I agree, grammar is not precisely clear and I think your phrase fits much better.

edit: And you might want to remove the link to Tracktion's sampler until you get its updated graph.

My bad, sorry. Will update asap.

intel · Post by **intel** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:07 am

and remove the Wusikstation one too.

george · Post by **george** » Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:09 am

intel wrote:and remove the Wusikstation one too.

No, it provides relevant information. Enough to make WilliamK remove all his posts in this thread, it seems.

The aliasing thread