http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/article ... -hits-quiz
(btw if it was Sia's original version of Diamonds I would have put that, just not Rihanna)
careful then, that's not a club you want to be part of.aMUSEd wrote:I'm 27 apparently(again)
vurt wrote:careful then, that's not a club you want to be part of.aMUSEd wrote:I'm 27 apparently(again)
I never heard of any of question one, but I'd bet money I've heard some if not all of it in Starbucks. I know what they're on about and hell to the no. I'm at least 100 years old and they need to stay off my damn lawn.deastman wrote:Over 28. No kidding... I didn’t even know who 99% of these people are, let alone the songs!
im not sure it was meant to be science based, and there aren't going to be many "you are over 300 years old" options for the test to get it right.Harry_HH wrote:28 or older.
Stupid. Wht not 1 year or older, the test was always right.
And - stupid, not even funny test. It covers only 90's and newer. And no classical music at all.
It's no fun if nobody get their knickers in a twist.aMUSEd wrote:Clearly I forgot to post this
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026