I don't see how they could "copyright" that. If they could, then any wave manipulated by any audio editor would be "copyrighted" to the authors of that same program. I know this "copyright" thing may be insane in some aspects, but even that has limits.Urs wrote:Ok then. Maybe we buy some. Does anyone know if .wav exported from Gladiator or Icarus can be used & shipped with other products, e.g. soundbanks for Serum? Or do Tone2 somehow retain some kind of copyright on user created documents?
Tone2 Gladiator 3 (public beta)
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 14431 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
fmr wrote:I don't see how they could "copyright" that. If they could, then any wave manipulated by any audio editor would be "copyrighted" to the authors of that same program. I know this "copyright" thing may be insane in some aspects, but even that has limits.Urs wrote:Ok then. Maybe we buy some. Does anyone know if .wav exported from Gladiator or Icarus can be used & shipped with other products, e.g. soundbanks for Serum? Or do Tone2 somehow retain some kind of copyright on user created documents?
That's my thought process too.
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 29 Nov, 2012 from My home is my castle
The synth uses MF2 files. They contain the waveform data. Most waveform data is not trivial content like a sawtooth. They were created in a creative process. The waveforms are then manipulated by rather complex algorithms. It is also not a trivial process.
If you check the exported output in a spectral editor you can see that there is a pretty unique frequency and phase response. In case of a juristic arguement a forensic analysis could proove that the origin of the sample is Gladiator.
Instead of just ripping Gladiator and then reusing the waveforms in 'own' products it would rather ask the copyright holder for a permission. Then you are on the Safe side
If you check the exported output in a spectral editor you can see that there is a pretty unique frequency and phase response. In case of a juristic arguement a forensic analysis could proove that the origin of the sample is Gladiator.
Instead of just ripping Gladiator and then reusing the waveforms in 'own' products it would rather ask the copyright holder for a permission. Then you are on the Safe side
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Wait, but the export is just to export the raw oscillator data, or the sound of the oscillator with the programmed modulations you programmed? I though it was the latter.flakes2 wrote:The synth uses MF2 files. They contain the waveform data. Most waveform data is not trivial content like a sawtooth. They were created in a creative process. The waveforms are then manipulated by rather complex algorithms. It is also not a trivial process.
If you check the exported output in a spectral editor you can see that there is a pretty unique frequency and phase response. In case of a juristic arguement a forensic analysis could proove that the origin of the sample is Gladiator.
Instead of just ripping Gladiator and then reusing the waveforms in 'own' products it would rather ask the copyright holder for a permission. Then you are on the Safe side
Anyway, I am with you in that it is "better safe than sorry"
Last edited by fmr on Sat Jun 30, 2018 1:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 14431 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
I assume it was importing your own waves and processing them thru gladiator/icarus.
(Although now thinking about it, the import function of Gladiator was disabled at some point if I recall correctly or never implemented)
rsp
(Although now thinking about it, the import function of Gladiator was disabled at some point if I recall correctly or never implemented)
rsp
sound sculptist
- u-he
- 30174 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
A-ha.flakes2 wrote:Urs: The license agreement of the Tone2 products does not allow a ripping or sampling of the product and a re-use for sample CDs or other commercial products. It can only be used for the production of songs. Everything that goes beyon requires a written permission from the copyright holder.
Why do you want to copy it? Why don't you create new and own ideas?
See, here's the difference between cool and gutless. Steve Duda gave us permission to create original wavetables in Serum and reuse them for commercial products without a blink. We asked simply because the waveform editor in Serum is the best out there.
We don't have any plans to "rip or sample" anyone's work, but we're checking out all solutions available on the market. We simply wish to add a comprehensive list of great and *compatible* waveform editors to an upcoming product, simply so sound designers can use the best tools available.
Apparently, if what you say is right (I bet you are!), Tone2 products use proprietary format which we have no intent to reverse engineer. Therefore Tone2 products, unlike Serum or WaveEdit, won't be on the list of "compatible" products and everyone can move on in peace.
- U
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Gladiator doesn't import waves. It uses a kind of "spectrum synthesis", where a wave is modulated by several spectrum processes, including another waveform (at least, it's how I see it - Tone 2 calls that HCM synthesis).zvenx wrote:I assume it was importing your own waves and processing them thru gladiator/icarus.
rsp
Last edited by fmr on Sat Jun 30, 2018 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 14431 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
Thanks.fmr wrote:Gladiator doesn't import waves. It uses a kind of "spectrum synthesis", where a wave is modulated by several spectrum processes (at least, it's how I see it - Tone 2 calls that HCM synthesis.zvenx wrote:I assume it was importing your own waves and processing them thru gladiator/icarus.
rsp
Its it resynthesis functionality I was fuzzy on.
http://www.tone2.org/forum/index.php?topic=191.0
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRAF
- 24403 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Steve Duda is a very cool guy overall.Urs wrote:A-ha.
See, here's the difference between cool and gutless. Steve Duda gave us permission to create original wavetables in Serum and reuse them for commercial products without a blink. We asked simply because the waveform editor in Serum is the best out there.
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 29 Nov, 2012 from My home is my castle
ere is no real modulation possible in Gladiator at all. Thats why you can not assign the HCM modifiers as modulation targets. The wavetables which are outputted are always pre-processed in 'pseudo realtime' within a second or so
@zvenx: they released a free tool for the import function several years ago. The import function did not work well enough to be ported to the main product
http://www.tone2.org/forum/index.php?topic=197.0
The new re-synthesis function of Icarus is a lot better
@zvenx: they released a free tool for the import function several years ago. The import function did not work well enough to be ported to the main product
http://www.tone2.org/forum/index.php?topic=197.0
The new re-synthesis function of Icarus is a lot better
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
Yes, resynthesis was thought as a feature to be implemented in the beginning, but never was, AFAIK. BTW, I think the function will only export the internal wavetables, because Gladiator has the oscillators in "pairs" (1-2, and 3-4) and what we see in the spectrum display is the result of the cross-modulation between the two and the different modulators. So, I think that the wav file exported will be just one of the Gladiator internal "wavetables", after all, not the final spectrum result (which would be much more interesting, IMO).zvenx wrote:Thanks.fmr wrote:Gladiator doesn't import waves. It uses a kind of "spectrum synthesis", where a wave is modulated by several spectrum processes (at least, it's how I see it - Tone 2 calls that HCM synthesis.zvenx wrote:I assume it was importing your own waves and processing them thru gladiator/icarus.
rsp
Its it resynthesis functionality I was fuzzy on.
http://www.tone2.org/forum/index.php?topic=191.0
rsp
Am I missing something?
Last edited by fmr on Sat Jun 30, 2018 1:50 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Fernando (FMR)
- u-he
- 30174 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
A bit of friendly advice: Maybe you should changeflakes2 wrote:The synth uses MF2 files.
- Added cross-product-compatibility: Save->'Export...' exports the sound of osc1 as an Icarus compatible wavetable in wav format
- Added cross-product-compatibility: Save->'Export...' exports the sound of osc1 as an Icarus compatible wavetable in fm2 format
- KVRAF
- 14431 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
Thiszvenx wrote:Thanks.fmr wrote:Gladiator doesn't import waves. It uses a kind of "spectrum synthesis", where a wave is modulated by several spectrum processes (at least, it's how I see it - Tone 2 calls that HCM synthesis.zvenx wrote:I assume it was importing your own waves and processing them thru gladiator/icarus.
rsp
Its it resynthesis functionality I was fuzzy on.
http://www.tone2.org/forum/index.php?topic=191.0
rsp
http://www.tone2.org/forum/index.php?topic=196.0
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRAF
- 14431 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
Now seeing this.... I added a link which I think may be this link after you posted this.flakes2 wrote:ere is no real modulation possible in Gladiator at all. Thats why you can not assign the HCM modifiers as modulation targets. The wavetables which are outputted are always pre-processed in 'pseudo realtime' within a second or so
@zvenx: they released a free tool for the import function several years ago. The import function did not work well enough to be ported to the main product
http://www.tone2.org/forum/index.php?topic=197.0
The new re-synthesis function of Icarus is a lot better
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRist
- 179 posts since 29 Nov, 2012 from My home is my castle
Urs:
why don't you simply move on? This thread is not about you or your products.
Why don't you respect the creative content produced by your competitors?
Would you be happy if your synth's graphics are ripped and photoshoped by a Chinese company?
Would you be happy if someone samples and clones a Song you have created and makes money with it?
why don't you simply move on? This thread is not about you or your products.
Why don't you respect the creative content produced by your competitors?
Would you be happy if your synth's graphics are ripped and photoshoped by a Chinese company?
Would you be happy if someone samples and clones a Song you have created and makes money with it?
