What's so special about Reaper?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

EvilDragon wrote:Flexibility is one important thing with which it attracts people. Probably the most important, apart from generally lean and efficient, stable code, and extremely great VST performance due to anticipative processing.
Lean and efficient!!!

Mainly, I dont need to keep track of how many VSTs are running: I can be more experimental or let projects get messy sometimes because I've never bumped the performance ceiling in Reaper, but in Ableton this happens all the time :/

Super fast manual chopping/arranging/editing clips. Simple little things like the nouse wheel locking to zoom and having no track 'types' means i get to slice move things around, and reconsiolidate new patterns very quickly. A lot of my drums are done by manually editing a sampled audio drum loop and spreading out variations uniquely chopped sections over a whole track - a technique that only emerged from how fast and easy it is to do this in Reaper.

In short- since I started using Reaper I started finishing whole tracks, and finishing them often. I was never really able to.do this in other DAWS. So for me that's pretty special! :)

Post

GaryG wrote:
zenophilix wrote:This. And honestly, I can't say I was super impressed back when I tried Reaper, so I'm honestly curious what attracts people to it apart from the price. Because if it was just the price, everyone would be using MuLab or Podium.
Correct me if I'm wrong but neither of those have timestretch capabilities for audio and are, imo, generally not really up to it for serious audio work.
That's kind of what I was getting at. Like I said, if it was just the price, everyone would be using those.
Nobody, Ever wrote:I have enough plugins.

Post

zenophilix wrote:
GaryG wrote:
zenophilix wrote:... so I'm honestly curious what attracts people to it apart from the price. Because if it was just the price, everyone would be using MuLab or Podium.
Correct me if I'm wrong but neither of those have timestretch capabilities for audio and are, imo, generally not really up to it for serious audio work.
That's kind of what I was getting at. Like I said, if it was just the price, everyone would be using those.
I believe that a serious musician with burning ambition uses the
best DAW he can get from his personal point of view and
with regard to his personal way of composing or mixing songs -
no matter if this DAW costs 600$ or 100$ or nothing.
free mp3s + info: andy-enroe.de songs + weird stuff: enroe.de

Post

enroe wrote:
zenophilix wrote:
GaryG wrote:
zenophilix wrote:... so I'm honestly curious what attracts people to it apart from the price. Because if it was just the price, everyone would be using MuLab or Podium.
Correct me if I'm wrong but neither of those have timestretch capabilities for audio and are, imo, generally not really up to it for serious audio work.
That's kind of what I was getting at. Like I said, if it was just the price, everyone would be using those.
I believe that a serious musician with burning ambition uses the
best DAW he can get from his personal point of view and
with regard to his personal way of composing or mixing songs -
no matter if this DAW costs 600$ or 100$ or nothing.
Well, yes, I agree.
Nobody, Ever wrote:I have enough plugins.

Post

Perhaps burning ambition and enough money?

Post

Can someone please tell me how I can edit the FX chains in the Resources (sws) window?
Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function | http://soundcloud.com/bmoorebeats

Post

You mean their order or?

Post

EvilDragon wrote:You mean their order or?
How to delete one of the fx in the chain, so I'm left with the instrument only.
Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function | http://soundcloud.com/bmoorebeats

Post

fluffy_little_something wrote:Most users are probably so unsuccessful that they qualify for the discounted version :wink:
Does anyone make real money from music anymore? I'm talking besides the obvious, like Taylor Swift and all. I just mean small time musicians. Seems it is harder than ever to make money from music. I guess playing live you can make something but even then. No one buys CDs anymore. Everyone expect music to be free and don't really value it. I guess records made a small comeback but still not THAT many sell every year. It's really a drop in the bucket.
my music: http://www.alexcooperusa.com
"It's hard to be humble, when you're as great as I am." Muhammad Ali

Post

ATS wrote:
fluffy_little_something wrote:Most users are probably so unsuccessful that they qualify for the discounted version :wink:
Does anyone make real money from music anymore? I'm talking besides the obvious, like Taylor Swift and all. I just mean small time musicians.
Did they ever make any real money?

Post

BMoore wrote:
EvilDragon wrote:You mean their order or?
How to delete one of the fx in the chain, so I'm left with the instrument only.
This is not up to SWS resources, you'd need to load the FX chain, remove what you don't want in it, then resave it.

Post

EvilDragon wrote:
BMoore wrote:
EvilDragon wrote:You mean their order or?
How to delete one of the fx in the chain, so I'm left with the instrument only.
This is not up to SWS resources, you'd need to load the FX chain, remove what you don't want in it, then resave it.
Ah, thanks :dog:
Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function | http://soundcloud.com/bmoorebeats

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”