D16 Fazortan 2

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Fazortan 2$59.00Buy

Post

chk071 wrote:Fazortan 1 is... alright. I still think Adam Szabo's Phazor, and the phaser in Spire are the best sounding software phasers.
They both sound like the Virus phaser

Phazortan gets me closer to the Small Stoney vibe though

Post

All the V1 versions of the D16 plugins are rough. Especially Redopter, Fazortan, and Syntorus. The tiny GUIs are also annoying. But all the V2s are great. It's unfortunate to have to upgrade to the usable version, but I'm glad it's coming.
Linux version?

Post

spoontechnique wrote:All the V1 versions of the D16 plugins are rough. Especially Redopter, Fazortan, and Syntorus. The tiny GUIs are also annoying. But all the V2s are great. It's unfortunate to have to upgrade to the usable version, but I'm glad it's coming.
I agree however the upgrade prices are usually only around £12 and they deserve that IMO.
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"

Post

mutantdog wrote:The original is definitely one of the best, unique sounding phasers. The new GUI looks like a big improvement and no doubt will sound great too. Hopefully the upgrade price will be reasonable.
+1

Post

it seems d16 will made a new standard with their V 2 effect!

Post

fingers crossed it doesn't have a ton of latency

it's been dire with the previous V2's

Post

Really? I only have Antresol in v2 but it seems OK for me.

Post

aMUSEd wrote:Really? I only have Antresol in v2 but it seems OK for me.

I'm getting 2.27ms with Decimort2 and 6.98ms with Devastor2.

Post

aMUSEd wrote:Really? I only have Antresol in v2 but it seems OK for me.
If memory serves right, Antresol doesn't have any latency in default quality. The others have, as loungepanda mentioned.

Post

acYm wrote:fingers crossed it doesn't have a ton of latency

it's been dire with the previous V2's
Distortion needs oversampling (so latency is introduced) to minimize aliasing, but I doubt a phaser would need latency. Fingers crossed anyway.

Post

Yeah I'd be surprised if a phaser has latency, at least at normal quality, its very much a realtime effect.

Post

presumably it's analog-modeled, and thus introduces subtle distortions. whether they warrant anti-aliasing remains to be seen, but D16 takes pride in their low aliasing figures.
I don't know what to write here that won't be censored, as I can only speak in profanity.

Post

aMUSEd wrote:
chk071 wrote:Fazortan 1 is... alright. I still think Adam Szabo's Phazor, and the phaser in Spire are the best sounding software phasers.
They both sound like the Virus phaser
You're right. Maybe i just happen to like that specific sound.

Post

Burillo wrote:presumably it's analog-modeled, and thus introduces subtle distortions. whether they warrant anti-aliasing remains to be seen, but D16 takes pride in their low aliasing figures.
They list "no harmonic distortion at output" as a feature on the website. If they'd modelled harmonic distortion you would assume that there is an input knob but there isn't. I don't know why that is supposed to be feature in an analog-modelled device, maybe they didn't think the distortion on the hardware sounded good. But obviously, a modelled allpass topology will distort a signal in other ways (I don' know if anti alisasing is needed for phase / time domain distortion).

Post

chk071 wrote:
aMUSEd wrote:
chk071 wrote:Fazortan 1 is... alright. I still think Adam Szabo's Phazor, and the phaser in Spire are the best sounding software phasers.
They both sound like the Virus phaser
You're right. Maybe i just happen to like that specific sound.
So do I, the Ti has great fx

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”