KOMPLETE 12 & 12 ULTIMATE Leak! Massive X Synthesizer, Kontakt 6...

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Komplete 26 Standard$549.00Buy

Post

rod_zero wrote: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:52 pm it amazes me people assume this synth is Reaktor based just because the GUI looks like.

As if the company couldn't use the same GUI assets/style in various products.
If it touts the Monark filter then that's kind of a strong push in the direction of being Reaktor based. (Which I am 100% fine with.)

Post

Actually, having had a look under the hood of Monark, I believe the development could be recreated outside of Reaktor or have been prototyped 'elsewhere'. I don't know, but without getting into the weeds it doesn't look like anything I've seen.

So I don't know how dependent 'Monark Filter' really is on Reaktor. Why can't they stick it in Kontakt? Where do the Kontakt 5 filters derive from?

Post

Can anyone explain why it even remotely matters? If it can be loaded standalone, I couldn't really care less. I'm more bothered about, ya know, is it a good synth?
http://www.guyrowland.co.uk
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15

Post

because this is kvr and the first rule of kvr is "moan about anything and everything"
:ud:

Post

Yeah. This place has a lot of negativity. It matters to people who don't have enough computer to run Reaktor, one supposes.

Just sayin'. I'm not bothered by anything needing Reaktor to load, that's for sure. Except for Absynth, all synths I even use are Reaktor.
Wait, I bought Equator from ROLI. I plan to explore that, maybe in the next project. I already bought Kontakt 6, interested in its new synth engine.

Post

It's probably amazing. I think Razor is amazing. I don't care if it is a Reaktor synth or not.

That doesn't change the fact that I think that it's a Reaktor-based synth that has new Reaktor-based wavetable oscillators and Monark Filters in it. Instead of coming up with a new name for it, they intelligently, from a marketing standpoint, decided to name it after Massive.

I happen to feel that if it is supposed to be the next Massive, then it should at least pretend to follow in the other synth's footsteps. Keep the logo, keep the blue/gray color scheme, keep the three primary oscillators and two filters and the stepper and all that.

If the only thing that unites it is the use of wavetable oscillators, is it really Massive? It might be, and probably is, amazing. But is it Massive?

Post

It's not a Reaktor ensemble. It's its own plugin. Trust me on this one. :wink:

Post

Hmmmm... :)
rsp
sound sculptist

Post

maybe if you where a good dragon people would trust you!
:ud:

Post

vurt wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 1:49 pm maybe if you where a good dragon people would trust you!
At least he‘s not ReaktorDragon...

Post

noiseboyuk wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 5:56 pm Can anyone explain why it even remotely matters? If it can be loaded standalone, I couldn't really care less. I'm more bothered about, ya know, is it a good synth?
someone probably already pointed this out, but Reaktor is not the most efficient synth host ever :D In addition it makes patch management and host automation a bit more complicated than just having a stand alone VSTi. I use Reaktor in VEP instances as well, and again it is more difficult to use remotely than a normal VSTi.

None of that is a Massive X ... errr I mean big problem IMO. I use Reaktor quite a bit. I use Razor, SkannerXT and Kontour quite a bit. Heck I even drop in Polyplex from time to time as it's kind of a fun little guy. Anyone who argues that Reaktor as a wrapper somehow affects the "sound" of the synth is yacking out their south side.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer

Post

SJ_Digriz - sure. But none of that applies once its a standalone synth, which was sorta my point. Arguably CPU use might be higher, but I wouldn't be at all sure of that.
http://www.guyrowland.co.uk
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15

Post

noiseboyuk wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 2:49 pm SJ_Digriz - sure. But none of that applies once its a standalone synth, which was sorta my point. Arguably CPU use might be higher, but I wouldn't be at all sure of that.
I would take EDs statement that MX is not a Reaktor synth. I'm just another of the opinion that even if it was, the complaint is overblown.
If you have to ask, you can't afford the answer

Post

SJ_Digriz wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 2:02 pm
noiseboyuk wrote: Fri Sep 28, 2018 5:56 pm Can anyone explain why it even remotely matters? If it can be loaded standalone, I couldn't really care less. I'm more bothered about, ya know, is it a good synth?
someone probably already pointed this out, but Reaktor is not the most efficient synth host ever :D In addition it makes patch management and host automation a bit more complicated than just having a stand alone VSTi. I use Reaktor in VEP instances as well, and again it is more difficult to use remotely than a normal VSTi.
I use it in VE Pro, except if I need to interact with controls via the mouse; Skanner I always use in Cubendo.
It's like this: VEP automation map window; learn; touch the parameter and it's in the list.
MIDI OTOH is a bit clunky to assign, I mean it takes an additional step here: learn MIDI/OSC, establish a CC in Cubendo, then go back and sort it in Reaktor. It's not a huge deal but it is pretty stupid. I use it when the instrument is designed for it: Steampipe/Steampipe 2 is. When I automate Skanner or Kontour it's Host Automation. In Cubendo I move knobs with the mouse with Write enabled and lanes are created. :shrug:

I have to set Kontakt Host Automation up in its list, then learn in VEP. VEP simply learns what you touch in Reaktor. Unless there is some instrument I'm not using which behaves funny.

I don't do saves in instrument much any more, I save a couple or three levels in VEP (channel set, project, server project). More hassle than it's worth in some things.

Post

vurt wrote: Sat Sep 29, 2018 1:49 pm maybe if you where a good dragon people would trust you!
He's only evil in the avatar photo afaict. You can't trust him to be purely evil or to look like that really.

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”