Too bad you cant put VST midi effects before a instrument like you can in Tracktion. I'm sure they'll fix that eventually.munchkin wrote: That track can have audio and midi effects on it.
First official SONAR 4 review is in!
-
- KVRAF
- 3745 posts since 29 Sep, 2002 from Killafornia
- Beware the Quoth
- 35474 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
munchkin quoth ]An example of how to organise synth tracks in a different way to Sonar is how Live 4 does it. A synth is opened in a midi track. That track can have audio and midi effects on it. For multiple outs just open as many tracks as you need and route the synth outs to them. 
Sure its an alternative, but once you get to a multitimbral synth, or a drum synth, where you want different MIDI tracks feeding into your synth, and the synth has multiple outs, then you've got three different kinds of track, not two (audio, MIDI, and audio/MIDI-special-mixed-instance-for-softsynths).
Thats far less linear than just having audio tracks and MIDI tracks. To me.
Sure its an alternative, but once you get to a multitimbral synth, or a drum synth, where you want different MIDI tracks feeding into your synth, and the synth has multiple outs, then you've got three different kinds of track, not two (audio, MIDI, and audio/MIDI-special-mixed-instance-for-softsynths).
Thats far less linear than just having audio tracks and MIDI tracks. To me.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Boston, Mass
I agree with whyterabbyt.
I thought Live's way of doing it was superior until I loaded Kontakt into Live and tried getting multiple outs to work. YIKES!!!!
I haven't complained about Sonars way since.
I thought Live's way of doing it was superior until I loaded Kontakt into Live and tried getting multiple outs to work. YIKES!!!!
I haven't complained about Sonars way since.
If it sounds good it is good.
-
- KVRian
- 535 posts since 11 Sep, 2004 from inne Büchs
What is a VST Midi Effect?AD80 wrote:Too bad you cant put VST midi effects before a instrument like you can in Tracktion.
Anything important?
- KVRAF
- 8701 posts since 9 Jan, 2004 from leroyaumeuni
is that one of them trolls, momma?uselessmind wrote:What is a VST Midi Effect?AD80 wrote:Too bad you cant put VST midi effects before a instrument like you can in Tracktion.
Anything important?
My other host is Bruce Forsyth
- Beware the Quoth
- 35474 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
uselessmind quoth
What is a VST Midi Effect?
Its a VST plugin that affects MIDI.
Anything important?
Yes, if you want to affect MIDI using a VST plugin.
What is a VST Midi Effect?
Its a VST plugin that affects MIDI.
Anything important?
Yes, if you want to affect MIDI using a VST plugin.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
- KVRian
- 535 posts since 11 Sep, 2004 from inne Büchs
No,was a serious question.spaceman wrote:is that one of them trolls, momma?uselessmind wrote:What is a VST Midi Effect?AD80 wrote:Too bad you cant put VST midi effects before a instrument like you can in Tracktion.
Anything important?
I never tought of affecting MIDI with a plugin.
@whyterabbyt:
thx for the answering such an obviously stupid question;)
Could you tell me for what this would be necessary and/or give a Hint to find a good Freeware-/Demo-VST?
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
there are many midi plugins- you can find some made by music lab, cakewalk includes those with sonar. Jasmine music technology makes a plugin called personal orchestrator that is a midi "backing band". There are all types of midi efx out there, session drummers, arpeggiators, delay efx, etc etc.
-
- KVRian
- 535 posts since 11 Sep, 2004 from inne Büchs
Oh,now i remember,i never paid much attention to these tools.
Maybe i should take a second look.
Anyhow,thx for the patience
Maybe i should take a second look.
Anyhow,thx for the patience
-
- KVRist
- 391 posts since 28 Apr, 2002
Can you elaborate on that? I'm still of a mind that two tracks where only one is typically needed is extra clutter. How is it so useful?S_A_P wrote:At first I thought that the 1 midi track/1 audio track was a pain as well, but it is INFININTELY more flexible, and I much prefer it now...
-
- KVRAF
- 1972 posts since 18 Apr, 2004
whyterabbyt wrote: Sure its an alternative, but once you get to a multitimbral synth, or a drum synth, where you want different MIDI tracks feeding into your synth, and the synth has multiple outs, then you've got three different kinds of track, not two (audio, MIDI, and audio/MIDI-special-mixed-instance-for-softsynths).
Thats far less linear than just having audio tracks and MIDI tracks. To me.
eric maybe i don't understand ,but Live excels at just this sort of thing, what was the prob. you were having? in live you can feed as many whatever tracks into whatever and out of whatever including multi-outs on instruments...very easy to setup too. what am i missing
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
Well because when I start a track I dont necessarily know how I want it to sound- so say for instance I load up FL studio for a drum part. At first I just route everything to the 1st output and start writing. By the time I get the basics all worked out, I can then say "this snare needs more compression" and route that to a different track.TeeLangSun wrote:Can you elaborate on that? I'm still of a mind that two tracks where only one is typically needed is extra clutter. How is it so useful?S_A_P wrote:At first I thought that the 1 midi track/1 audio track was a pain as well, but it is INFININTELY more flexible, and I much prefer it now...
Or say for instance that you are using a multi out/multi timbral synth, and decide later to add a 2nd part, I can just create another audio track and route the audio through it so that I can apply efx to it individually. Not to mention I can create a 2nd midi channel and route that to the softsynth on a different midi channel.
If you are used to other hosts, say orion or FL studio, I can see how you feel(coz I felt the same way) but once you realize how many options you have with routing audio and midi data, I wont switch back.
As has been said earlier, it makes a softsynth "feel" more like a hardware synth, since they are configured in sonar the same way.
Either way if it *really* bothers you, you could hide the audio track.
-
- KVRist
- 495 posts since 5 Sep, 2002 from Boston, Mass
stale bread,
Maybe its just how I like my workflow, but I think the idea of the plugin unattached from any physical audio or midi tracks works smoother when dealing with multi-outs. I can use multi-outs in Live fine, it just doesn't feel as 'clean'
On the other side, the way Live handled single out VSTis is much cleaner.
This plays exactly to how I use Live and Sonar tho, so I'm happy with both situations.
Maybe its just how I like my workflow, but I think the idea of the plugin unattached from any physical audio or midi tracks works smoother when dealing with multi-outs. I can use multi-outs in Live fine, it just doesn't feel as 'clean'
On the other side, the way Live handled single out VSTis is much cleaner.
This plays exactly to how I use Live and Sonar tho, so I'm happy with both situations.
If it sounds good it is good.
-
- KVRist
- 189 posts since 29 Jan, 2003 from location, location, location...
Well said.S_A_P wrote:Well because when I start a track I dont necessarily know how I want it to sound- so say for instance I load up FL studio for a drum part. At first I just route everything to the 1st output and start writing. By the time I get the basics all worked out, I can then say "this snare needs more compression" and route that to a different track.TeeLangSun wrote:Can you elaborate on that? I'm still of a mind that two tracks where only one is typically needed is extra clutter. How is it so useful?S_A_P wrote:At first I thought that the 1 midi track/1 audio track was a pain as well, but it is INFININTELY more flexible, and I much prefer it now...
Or say for instance that you are using a multi out/multi timbral synth, and decide later to add a 2nd part, I can just create another audio track and route the audio through it so that I can apply efx to it individually. Not to mention I can create a 2nd midi channel and route that to the softsynth on a different midi channel.
If you are used to other hosts, say orion or FL studio, I can see how you feel(coz I felt the same way) but once you realize how many options you have with routing audio and midi data, I wont switch back.
As has been said earlier, it makes a softsynth "feel" more like a hardware synth, since they are configured in sonar the same way.
Either way if it *really* bothers you, you could hide the audio track.
-
- KVRian
- 897 posts since 2 Aug, 2001 from norway
we just ordered 10 copies of sonar 4
(for the college of bergen) but it wont be here until mid october.
