Which software emulations can null files from my analog synths?

[Elektronisch]

It is just not possible, physics prevents that. Even same analog synth cannot null itself due to physics.

Here you go again, but since these older "facts" now are contradicted by KVR authorities elsewhere, they must have been fake news all along.

Well again giberish, we dont knwo what authorities you are talking about, you never presented what they said what they told you or anything. We dont read everything what is being written in every thread. jeeesh

[whyterabbyt]

I also detect a large tendency towards Generalised Objectivity Bias in Subjectively Handled Information of Technical Evidence

[vurt]

It is just not possible, physics prevents that. Even same analog synth cannot null itself due to physics.

Here you go again, but since these older "facts" now are contradicted by KVR authorities elsewhere, they must have been fake news all along.

Well again giberish, we dont knwo what authorities you are talking about, you never presented what they said what they told you or anything. We dont read everything what is being written in every thread. jeeesh

well he said "cheap analogues mean people dont need to use emulations anymore"

several reasons where given why people may use emus

he said, but the sound isn't the same

several people said "it's close enough, given extras like patch recall and space, ill stick with emus"

then it got a bit "you're a dick" "i know you are but what am I?"

[IncarnateX]

It is just not possible, physics prevents that. Even same analog synth cannot null itself due to physics.

Here you go again, but since these older "facts" now are contradicted by KVR authorities elsewhere, they must have been fake news all along.

no, you are misrepresenting what was said.
also, opening a thread to carry on an argument that you got another thread closed with, im pretty sure that's against the rules.


mjolniiiiiiir!

Who are answering to who here? I wrote to Elektronisch to prevent him spreading fake news about physics since they are now rejected by the KVR community and thus must be wrong.

Now how can I misrepresent something Vurt said and where are the rules I should had consulted before deciding to explore this unresolved scientific question?

It is our duty to mankind to find out such things.

[samsam]

Pseud's Corner.

[vurt]

It is just not possible, physics prevents that. Even same analog synth cannot null itself due to physics.

Here you go again, but since these older "facts" now are contradicted by KVR authorities elsewhere, they must have been fake news all along.

no, you are misrepresenting what was said.
also, opening a thread to carry on an argument that you got another thread closed with, im pretty sure that's against the rules.


mjolniiiiiiir!

Who are answering to who here? I wrote to Elektronisch to prevent him spreading fake news about physics since they are now rejected by the KVR community and thus must be wrong.

Now how can I misrepresent something Vurt said and where are the rules I should had consulted before deciding to explore this unresolved scientific question?

It is our duty to mankind to find out such things.

time for bed, said zebedee!

[fmr]

And what exactly have you heard?

As far as I recall: That a certain emulation synth's precision can not longer be disputed as to whether you are able to hear a difference between it and analog synths in headphones and to prefer the analogs. If you think you do, it is because you are old and have shitty ears that cannot hear the warmth of higher frequencies. And it is all backed up objectively. There was a lot of other things to it but must have been too scientific to be comprehensible to me. Forgive my ignorance.

So, nowhere is said that a software emulation will (or should) null an analog synth. I rest my case.

[IncarnateX]

well he said "cheap analogues mean people dont need to use emulations anymore"

Not really. I opened with a little teasing question but made clear it concerned my personal choice but that is a language KVR people do not understand. Every opinion you express must be a universal statement appealing to objectivity and shit like that.

[whyterabbyt]

I would be grateful for any suggestions in accordance with my own preferences.

Have you tried stuffing them together in your Analog Recalibrated Softsynth Evaluator?

[IncarnateX]

So, nowhere is said that a software emulation will (or should) null an analog synth. I rest my case.

Not litterally, but the pretentious "objectivity" of the opinion in question took it as close as if it were.

[vurt]

well he said "cheap analogues mean people dont need to use emulations anymore"

Not really. I opened with a little teasing question but made clear it concerned my personal choice but that is a language KVR people do not understand. Every opinion you express must be a universal statement appealing to objectivity and shit like that.

no
the objectivity bit was about bones opinion on the moog ladder filter, which he said was an objective truth that his opinion agreed with.

no one questioned your objectivity, they just replied, with their opinions and you started saying they didn't understand it was just your opinion.
whereas, the reality was, you missed that they in turn where giving their opinions, because well, that's how conversations work. bro.

[vurt]

So, nowhere is said that a software emulation will (or should) null an analog synth. I rest my case.

Not litterally, but the pretentious "objectivity" of the opinion in question took it as close as if it were.

so, i was right
you opened this thread to continue an argument from a locked thread?
do you have nothing better to do?

[Elektronisch]

It is just not possible, physics prevents that. Even same analog synth cannot null itself due to physics.

Here you go again, but since these older "facts" now are contradicted by KVR authorities elsewhere, they must have been fake news all along.

no, you are misrepresenting what was said.
also, opening a thread to carry on an argument that you got another thread closed with, im pretty sure that's against the rules.


mjolniiiiiiir!

Who are answering to who here? I wrote to Elektronisch to prevent him spreading fake news about physics since they are now rejected by the KVR community and thus must be wrong.

Now how can I misrepresent something Vurt said and where are the rules I should had consulted before deciding to explore this unresolved scientific question?

It is our duty to mankind to find out such things.

But KVR community is saying that analog cant be nulified because of Physics, how is that a rejection i dont understand that.

You may be able to recreate an analog sound on a digital synth to the extent that your own personal ear cannot hear a difference. However my ear will be different to yours.

Uh, uh, remember the rules of the OP: No talk about the different processing of brains. We do not need that one in KVR discussions. So you can leave those ears of mine alone for now (and it feels a little uncomfortable that you compare them to yours, when I do not know whether mine are bigger and uglier than your own). Let us stick to stimulation only.

Stimulate your penis. It helps to calm down.

[IncarnateX]

Have you tried stuffing them together in your Analog Recalibrated Softsynth Evaluator?

Wish I could code such a thing, but it is beyond me. Till now, my preference for synths has been much dependent on combinations of stimulants, the time of day (or night), and whether I have actually turned my synths on while playing them. Depending on mixture, the latter is not always given, but I wouldn't know as long as it sounds friggin great.

Though, health says I need a more objective criterion.

[vurt]

maybe some time away from the computer/internet?

lord knows the rest of us could use it...