Looking for some insight on mastering
-
- KVRist
- 76 posts since 3 Jun, 2017
Hey guys,
This is probably in the wrong thread since I don't usually post up here and will like be a noob question for some of you but I'm looking to get some insight about something regarding mastering. I recently had an engineer whom I went to ask for 24bit 44.1 stereo files to be submitted over for the job (which I sent over accordingly to his requirements) and noticed that when I received the final results, after checking on the "get info" tab of the file, it said the following:
Sample rate: 44,100
Bits per sample: 16
I'm not too familiar with the whole mastering process but am looking to get some clarification on the matter to see if the final result that was sent back to me was supposed to be at 24bits (which is what I sent over to the engineer) or if he did some rendering, etc that resulted it to become 16bits instead.
Like I said, complete noob here with the mastering process but am interested to know more about it and hopefully someone can shed some light on the subject since I'm not entirely sure how much of a difference there is between a finalized mastered at 16bit vs 24bit and if I should be contacting the mastering engineer back to ask about the concern (if there really is any).
Thanks everyone
XnuXnu
This is probably in the wrong thread since I don't usually post up here and will like be a noob question for some of you but I'm looking to get some insight about something regarding mastering. I recently had an engineer whom I went to ask for 24bit 44.1 stereo files to be submitted over for the job (which I sent over accordingly to his requirements) and noticed that when I received the final results, after checking on the "get info" tab of the file, it said the following:
Sample rate: 44,100
Bits per sample: 16
I'm not too familiar with the whole mastering process but am looking to get some clarification on the matter to see if the final result that was sent back to me was supposed to be at 24bits (which is what I sent over to the engineer) or if he did some rendering, etc that resulted it to become 16bits instead.
Like I said, complete noob here with the mastering process but am interested to know more about it and hopefully someone can shed some light on the subject since I'm not entirely sure how much of a difference there is between a finalized mastered at 16bit vs 24bit and if I should be contacting the mastering engineer back to ask about the concern (if there really is any).
Thanks everyone
XnuXnu
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
It's because 44.1 16 bit WAV or AIFF is the audio standard for CD production and iTunes. Is that what your master is for?
https://fileinfo.com/help/cd_audio
https://fileinfo.com/help/cd_audio
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 76 posts since 3 Jun, 2017
I would believe so, the songs are being uploaded to Bandcamp, Youtube, Spotify, etc so I wasn't entirely sure if there would be any issues that may arise since they were 24bit 44.1 stereo wave files when I originally submitted them over to be mastered.
I appreciate the clarification on the matter, I'm a complete novice with this stuff so this was something that I was curious about and also interested in understanding more about.
Thank you!
I appreciate the clarification on the matter, I'm a complete novice with this stuff so this was something that I was curious about and also interested in understanding more about.
Thank you!
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
They're likely in the habit of outputting Redbook standard. I don't know if uploading a 16-bit vs a 24-bit to soundcloud or bandcamp means anything, but I give a codec as much as I can before they compress it to 128kbps. So it's either old-school or negligence, I couldn't say. I would specify 24-bit unless I was going to mass-produce a CD (I'm not), which has to be Redbook, 16-bit 44.1 (and other niggling things).