Audio Interface upgrade necessary ?

If you are new here check this forum first, your question may have been answered.
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

I've been using a Focusrite Solo audio interface for a few years now and I'm wondering if I should look into getting a new interface. I don't feel like the one I have now sucks in any way, I'm more so just curious if I may be missing out on a better interface. I don't record any instruments but I do use a mic every once and a while. My main question is, is there an audio interface in the $400 and below range that would give me a significant difference in sound clarity than the Focusrite solo? I'm mostly focused on hearing the most from my mix that I can.

Post

I don't think so. From there the updgrade that would make sense to me is RME. Rock solid drivers, configurable mixer, stellar sound but you don't seem to need the extra bells and whistles.

My advice is stick to it put money aside and make a move when needed for a topnotch unit that will serve you for many years to come otherwise I don't think you will benefit much.
Win11, 16 Gig RAM, Intel i7 Quad 3.9, Reaper 7.16, RME Hamerfall HDSP9652, Steinberg MR816x

Post

192kHz/24-bit on the Scarlett Solo looks pretty good to me.
"I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not too sure."
Checkout my blog: VST Plugins Free Download.

Post

The only weak point to me is the RCA outputs but if they're not giving you any trouble I think you're fine with the Solo for what you're doing.

Post

Would an RME card improve latency?

Post

Don't upgrade unless you seriously feel the need to do so. Learning how to make the best out of the gear you have is just as essential as learning how to actually produce decent music.
My solo projects:
Hekkräiser (experimental) | MFG38 (electronic/soundtrack) | The Santtu Pesonen Project (metal/prog)

Post

I had a Roland Quad Capture for a while and i found it the best in that price bracket for what i have tried.
I have upgraded since to seomthing more professional.
A analog 2 channel interface.

Post

dandezebra wrote: Tue Feb 26, 2019 3:50 am Would an RME card improve latency?
Yes, typically they are amongst (if not) the best in the business, driver and latency wise.
logifuzz-vst-plugins wrote: Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:10 am 192kHz/24-bit on the Scarlett Solo looks pretty good to me.
Doesn't really mean a whole lot compared with the rest of the signal path. Quoting a spec on the chip doesn't mean a whole lot if the D/A stage isn't up to scratch and given the price point I expect some corners to be cut in the implementation, it's inevitable with any unit at that price point.

Although, there are also plenty of midrange units that would offer a better set of preamps when compared with budget models (if not quite the same latency levels as RME) and I would expect a step up in the AD/DA stages by moving up the price bands as well as better clocking (offering sharper imaging with less smearing on the outputs) with well-designed units.

RME's included DAC's on the lower end models are adequate if not a little utilitarian leaving them without any real unique character and perhaps offering the perception of them being a little cold although that does mean fairly neutral. Not a bad thing if you just want a clean signal, but if you're looking for something with a bit of something to it that imparts a bit of warmth, well, maybe not your first choice. The point with their kit is that you can hook up your choice of external converters and you can tweak your own signal path to get the sound you really want whilst making use of their best in class drivers.

It can get rather expensive, rather quickly, but you probably won't find a much more versatile way of doing things.

Focusrite's own clarrett's had an upgrade in signal chain over the lower end units, once again there are gains to be had as you move through the range.

MOTU's all in one boxes tend to have reasonable drivers, good signal paths and tight clocking.

The Presonus Quantums tend to be good all-rounders too, although we're well and truly into Thunderbolt territory now.

Zoom's UAC 2 has some of the best "budget" drivers (tight latency), although the DA/AD is more along the functional line. It'll get the job done though, especially if your focus is working in the box.

Plenty of other reasonable units across the price points, but you should figure out where you want to focus as a good as a cheap jack of all trades doesn't really exist.

Price/Performance/Quality.

Pick 2.
Last edited by Kaine on Thu Mar 21, 2019 9:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post

flowsnice wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 11:30 pm I've been using a Focusrite Solo audio interface for a few years now and I'm wondering if I should look into getting a new interface. I don't feel like the one I have now sucks in any way, I'm more so just curious if I may be missing out on a better interface. I don't record any instruments but I do use a mic every once and a while. My main question is, is there an audio interface in the $400 and below range that would give me a significant difference in sound clarity than the Focusrite solo? I'm mostly focused on hearing the most from my mix that I can.
better interface ??
the only thing you need to see is the how good is the DAC/ADC(codec),AMP and how good is the usb controller.

if these three are good then you have the best

spending 400$ does not always equals to good interface BTW

and if you want something for getting the most crystal sound then invest into good DAC + AMP and good headphones

https://www.schiit.com (for DAC and AMP)

and maybe a headphone from massdrop
REAPER, Phase Plant , Unfiltered Audio TRIAD and LION, NI classic collection,......... ETC

Post

Hi
If you really think like this:

"I don't feel like the one I have now sucks in any way, I'm more so just curious if I may be missing out on a better interface"

it's because you don't need a new interface. Trust me.

Post Reply

Return to “Getting Started (AKA What is the best...?)”