no thanks I prefer hardware
Why will software people not admit hardware sounds better?
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
- KVRAF
- 4589 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Warsaw
Things don't sound good as they should until they are (properly) mixed. The whole "digital vs analog" war is meaningless.
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
-
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 14312 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
It might break down, that's always the whisk.
-
- KVRist
- 445 posts since 3 Feb, 2017
At the moment I'm stripping my (overkill) setup, so I'm in the midst of carefully comparing my soft synths with vintage, modern and modular and one thing is clear for me ...there's NOTHING like the sound of vintage gear and I very much prefer that sound.
Modern synths sound and feel like soft synths to me,
so I rather have a set of high end plugs ins than one or two modern hardware.
Modern synths sound and feel like soft synths to me,
so I rather have a set of high end plugs ins than one or two modern hardware.
-
- KVRist
- 445 posts since 3 Feb, 2017
How would you know ? With your computer specs you probably can't even play a chord with Diva in Divine mode. Why would you list this anyway ? Serious question.
- KVRian
- 923 posts since 8 Aug, 2011
The difference compared to software is the wind coming out wich creates movement on the microphone.
Win11, 16 Gig RAM, Intel i7 Quad 3.9, Reaper 7.16, RME Hamerfall HDSP9652, Steinberg MR816x
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
This thread needs help. Most of you are avoiding the question and those who answer it are wrong. So here are some hypotheses to think about. (I think someone actually put the first one forward somewhere, cannot remember who, so I will pretend I came up with it on my own.)
So why will software people not just admit that hardware sound better?
1. They do not own any piece of hardware and do not have a clue. Nothing to admit. Sheer ignorance only. Plausible in KVR context.
2. They do have a clue but need to justify buying 567 softsynths at a price 100 times higher than a decent piece of hardware. Highly plausible in KVR context.
3. They know hardware sounds better but just hate to admit it because they often have claimed the opposite and realised their failure later. Plausible in KVR context.
4. They have bought the software first, asked themselves why afterwards, and have inferred the conclusion that it must be because it sounds as good as- or better than the hardware. Extremely plausible in KVR context
5. They are deaf or
6. They are stupid or
7. Both. Plausible in wider life context, including KVR.
And that is just a few. If you want more, you can ask me to write them in this thread instead of mailing me long fan-letters. I do not have time to read them all, anyway.
So why will software people not just admit that hardware sound better?
1. They do not own any piece of hardware and do not have a clue. Nothing to admit. Sheer ignorance only. Plausible in KVR context.
2. They do have a clue but need to justify buying 567 softsynths at a price 100 times higher than a decent piece of hardware. Highly plausible in KVR context.
3. They know hardware sounds better but just hate to admit it because they often have claimed the opposite and realised their failure later. Plausible in KVR context.
4. They have bought the software first, asked themselves why afterwards, and have inferred the conclusion that it must be because it sounds as good as- or better than the hardware. Extremely plausible in KVR context
5. They are deaf or
6. They are stupid or
7. Both. Plausible in wider life context, including KVR.
And that is just a few. If you want more, you can ask me to write them in this thread instead of mailing me long fan-letters. I do not have time to read them all, anyway.
-
- Boss Lovin' DR
- 14312 posts since 15 Mar, 2002 from the grimness of yorkshire
-
- KVRAF
- 35679 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Rather Queen Margrethe.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
As in “being ignorant” ? Already covered in 1) , 6) and 7)
Of course, a softsynth guy who says he does not care cannot be trusted. This just begs the question.
- KVRAF
- 8577 posts since 29 Sep, 2010 from Maui
From my limited experience, they don’t behave the same and therefore sound different. IMO hardware sounds better, even hardware that’s driven by software, which is largely the case nowdays. Despite all the cool math, models of the way electricity behaves can never truly be accurate because it’s impossible to account for every variable.
A reasonable facsimile is one thing, but that’s all they are. Like it or not.
A reasonable facsimile is one thing, but that’s all they are. Like it or not.