perpetual3 wrote: Sat Jun 29, 2019 1:59 am So, this alleged aliasing, is really only an issue at lower sample rates, right? If you run your session at 88.2 or higher, you wouldn’t need oversampling per say, because the aliasing issue would disappear right?
It's not that it would really disappear, it's just that you effectively double the nyqvist frequency (to 44.1khz) and any potential folded aliasing residuals that come back across all the way from there would practically not exist except mathematically.
I mean, don't quote me on this, but that's how it should technically work but measures that counter anti-aliasing might work differently there.



