I don't personally care about the fame aspect, instead care what they actually do. I'm sure that for example an endorsement from Nils Frahm (just for a thought experiment) would be pretty huge even though Nils Frahm probably hasn't occupied that many top lists. NI was pretty sure too considering the Noire library, which I truly love.Forgotten wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:12 pmNever heard of him so I looked him up. His only claim to fame is that he had a number 20 hit on the US Dance Charts 3 years ago.Functional wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2019 4:04 pmThis may seem like a bad thing but it actually is a good thing. A lot of people were worried (to a degree, even me) that Massive will be oriented heavily towards that kind of userbase whereas what we got was something that not many necessarily expected, at least not entirely. Problem here is that synths that appeal to Virtual Riot type of stuff are already plentiful and all around.neodeavid wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2019 2:19 pm VIRTUAL RIOT IS NOT FEELING MASSIVE X
https://twitter.com/Virtual_Riot?lang=es
Not sure why people think that these opinions are somehow equivalent to coherent arguments.
But Virtual Riot makes stuff that essentially all can be lumped under EDM. We have enough "edm synths". If Massive X was made solely with EDM in mind, we wouldn't have had that robust comb filter, we wouldn't have track delay (useful in conjunction with feedback), we wouldn't have some of the osc modes. They don't serve a purpose in EDM at all. Whereas an "EDM synth" is a synth that streamlines the process of making EDM leads and other stuff as much as possible, so some other things will get cut down in the process of streamlining. For example whole concept of semi-modularity is not really something you'd care when you're making EDM.
But I thought Serum is the current standard for an EDM synth or whatever, so they can use it all they like while I'm happy that we finally got a huge synth that isn't oriented towards EDM.
