Renoise updated to 3.2 (Redux to 1.1)

[el-bo (formerly ebow)]

https://forum.renoise.com/t/renoise-3-2 ... ased/58011

[gentleclockdivider]

Awesome !!!!!

[el-bo (formerly ebow)]

Awesome !!!!!

Time of me to actually learn it, maybe

[solidtrax]

Great news, thanks for this superb update!

[gentleclockdivider]

I requested the exponential curves a couple of years ago (2015) , great to see it it implemented
https://forum.renoise.com/t/the-envelop ... irks/45178

[Benutzername]

Awesome !!!!!

Time of me to actually learn it, maybe

Trackers are still the only way to use the computer as the actual musical instrument instead of just emulating hardware instruments and real world workflows on a computer screen. It's definitely fun and a good way to get a new perspective on music.

Nice to see that Renoise is still there. It doesn't get as much attention from me as it used to but I still love it.

[DrFolder]

What a great update. Looks great.

[antic604]

'nuff said

[perfumer]

What, there is no 32 bit Windows build anymore?

Still no sidechaining, easy routing, pan law... Well OK then, I guess the UI was more important. It's an audio application after all, of course you have to have the UI done right. Right?!

[el-bo (formerly ebow)]

Trackers are still the only way to use the computer as the actual musical instrument instead of just emulating hardware instruments and real world workflows on a computer screen.

This seems to be an idea that I've seen quite a lot, but I'm not sure I really agree/understand. I don't see it as much different than mouse-clicking in a piano-roll in terms of computer music on it's own merits. Furthermore, even traditional linear daw's have long surpassed the tape workflows they were initially designed to replicate, because computers

It's definitely fun and a good way to get a new perspective on music.

This I can definitely get behind, and it was the main reason for being attracted to it. I only bought it this year, but got the feeling via the forum that it may have been abandoned for a new project. That's why I thought it best to not get too invested in learning it, especially as being an OSX user we get stiffed for general compatibility long before Windows users

But hey! Look where we are now

[gentleclockdivider]

That's why is a dot update , taktik said the gui scaling was the first on the to do list .
Best thing of all , renoise is NOT dead .

[perfumer]

That's why is a dot update , taktik said the gui scaling was the first on the to do list .

Talking about priorities....

Best thing of all , renoise is NOT dead .

Just half-way there.

[perfumer]

Buzz had side-chaining ~15 years ago, and easy routing from the start, a.k.a. ~20 years ago.

Just sayin'.

[reusenoise]

What, there is no 32 bit Windows build anymore?

Still no sidechaining, easy routing, pan law... Well OK then, I guess the UI was more important. It's an audio application after all, of course you have to have the UI done right. Right?!

Some youtube tuts.

[Benutzername]

Trackers are still the only way to use the computer as the actual musical instrument instead of just emulating hardware instruments and real world workflows on a computer screen.

This seems to be an idea that I've seen quite a lot, but I'm not sure I really agree/understand. I don't see it as much different than mouse-clicking in a piano-roll in terms of computer music on it's own merits. Furthermore, even traditional linear daw's have long surpassed the tape workflows they were initially designed to replicate, because computers

Today it's more a different mindset than actually a technical difference. Renoise has many modern DAW features like automation curves, envelopes, full features mixer, VST support etc. The only real differences left are the pattern based structure and the numerical input instead of spread sheets (= arranger) and a piano roll.