the improved 2.5 version looks somehow better and feels snappier than the original 2.0 version.
also a reason i kept it.
You have to use Strobe's sub-oscillator to get the 101 sound. The following demos were made with Strobe v1 and a real Roland SH-101, each file plays the same riff on both synths:Echoes in the Attic wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:34 pm Strobe oscs sound nothing like a 101 at lower octave ranges, especially when mixing waveforms to try to emulate the 101 mixed osc, so yeah maybe a little more junoish. Kind of it’s own thing though.
There are a number of changes that will create a difference between the two versions. For example, by default the filter drive is much higher in Strobe 1 so you get this plummy sound in the initialised patch, and this tells our ears that Strobe 1 is fatter. But, turn the filter drive dial up in V2 and you will get the same plummy sound.
Amazing! That’s the closest I’ve ever heard a plugin get to the real thing.
Yeah of course you have to use the sub osc. It can sound very close as your examples show, however I've done really close comparisons and there are many settings where sub osc + regular osc can not sound like a 101. In particular with the filter more open. Yours were mostly quite filtered.himalaya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:40 pmYou have to use Strobe's sub-oscillator to get the 101 sound. The following demos were made with Strobe v1 and a real Roland SH-101, each file plays the same riff on both synths:Echoes in the Attic wrote: ↑Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:34 pm Strobe oscs sound nothing like a 101 at lower octave ranges, especially when mixing waveforms to try to emulate the 101 mixed osc, so yeah maybe a little more junoish. Kind of it’s own thing though.
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... y_saw1.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Growl.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Nasal.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... bounce.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Synth.wav
Were you testing Strobe 1 or 2?Echoes in the Attic wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:15 pm It can sound very close as your examples show, however I've done really close comparisons and there are many settings where sub osc + regular osc can not sound like a 101. In particular with the filter more open. Yours were mostly quite filtered.
V2. To be fair it was probably a small range of potential sounds that couldn't match, but it is an element of the 101 I really like, which is the sub osc with either/or the saw and square osc mixed in to it, at low bass range notes, with a pretty open filter. The 101 has a pretty unique sound there. I had been comparing several 101 type synths to see which really got close in that range. Interestingly Bazille got closer to a 101 for the specific osc range I was testing than Strobe did. The Reaktor 101 type osc block was quite accurate and obviously the TAL and Roland were best.Uncle E wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:07 pmWere you testing Strobe 1 or 2?Echoes in the Attic wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:15 pm It can sound very close as your examples show, however I've done really close comparisons and there are many settings where sub osc + regular osc can not sound like a 101. In particular with the filter more open. Yours were mostly quite filtered.
Which one comes first?himalaya wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:40 pm You have to use Strobe's sub-oscillator to get the 101 sound. The following demos were made with Strobe v1 and a real Roland SH-101, each file plays the same riff on both synths:
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... y_saw1.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Growl.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Nasal.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... bounce.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Synth.wav
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement