Fxpansion Strobe 2 is available

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Strobe (DCAM: Synth Squad) Strobe2

Post

4damind wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2019 11:17 am I see Strobe as a mix of the SH101 and the Juno 60. This synth is a bit underrated (or people don't like the new GUI)
the improved 2.5 version looks somehow better and feels snappier than the original 2.0 version.
also a reason i kept it. :D
Image

Post

Strobe oscs sound nothing like a 101 at lower octave ranges, especially when mixing waveforms to try to emulate the 101 mixed osc, so yeah maybe a little more junoish. Kind of it’s own thing though.

Post

MPE is also a great thing about strobe. Someday I'll get seaboard or whatever.
Believe it or not, I once had Strobe 2 some time ago, then sold it, and then bought it again, because I kinda missed the sound :D
Version 2.5 is much much better with cpu usage. But I feel like previous version have better sound and filter envelope. I don't know, maybe it just me..

Post

Echoes in the Attic wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:34 pm Strobe oscs sound nothing like a 101 at lower octave ranges, especially when mixing waveforms to try to emulate the 101 mixed osc, so yeah maybe a little more junoish. Kind of it’s own thing though.
You have to use Strobe's sub-oscillator to get the 101 sound. The following demos were made with Strobe v1 and a real Roland SH-101, each file plays the same riff on both synths:

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... y_saw1.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Growl.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Nasal.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... bounce.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Synth.wav
http://www.electric-himalaya.com
VSTi and hardware synth sound design
3D/5D sound design since 2012

Post

eluherlu wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2019 6:54 pm
Version 2.5 is much much better with cpu usage. But I feel like previous version have better sound and filter envelope. I don't know, maybe it just me..
There are a number of changes that will create a difference between the two versions. For example, by default the filter drive is much higher in Strobe 1 so you get this plummy sound in the initialised patch, and this tells our ears that Strobe 1 is fatter. But, turn the filter drive dial up in V2 and you will get the same plummy sound.

Strobe 2 is immediately brighter sounding as it's set to 2x oversampling by default, so this could create an illusion that it is colder sounding...but it just sounds as it should, 'present' and 'vibrant'.

The envelopes are scaled differently in v2, if I recall correctly.

Then, Strobe V2 offers much more control when it comes to the actual 'tone' (check out the new 'Tone' and 'Shape' parameters).

Also, the included effects can alter the sound in new ways, not possible in Strobe 1 (even if used in Fusor), so overall, there is much more going on in Strobe2. It's possible to create a richer, more intricate sonic output in Strobe 2.
http://www.electric-himalaya.com
VSTi and hardware synth sound design
3D/5D sound design since 2012

Post

himalaya wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:40 pm You have to use Strobe's sub-oscillator to get the 101 sound. The following demos were made with Strobe v1 and a real Roland SH-101, each file plays the same riff on both synths:
Amazing! That’s the closest I’ve ever heard a plugin get to the real thing.

Post

I mean Strobe is also used by Above & Beyond and by others (mostly for Trance) and especially for bass sounds. Of course you have to program it accordingly also with the sub-oscillators.
Anyway... the examples sound pretty close to a SH101!

Post

SH-101 still sounds rounder and warmer in those examples. I'm feeling TAL's BassLine is still closer to it (well obviously since that's the sole purpose of it) - but for a synth that doesn't have an express mission to sound 1:1 to SH-101, those examples are indeed quite close.

Post

himalaya wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:40 pm
Echoes in the Attic wrote: Tue Dec 31, 2019 5:34 pm Strobe oscs sound nothing like a 101 at lower octave ranges, especially when mixing waveforms to try to emulate the 101 mixed osc, so yeah maybe a little more junoish. Kind of it’s own thing though.
You have to use Strobe's sub-oscillator to get the 101 sound. The following demos were made with Strobe v1 and a real Roland SH-101, each file plays the same riff on both synths:

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... y_saw1.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Growl.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Nasal.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... bounce.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Synth.wav
Yeah of course you have to use the sub osc. It can sound very close as your examples show, however I've done really close comparisons and there are many settings where sub osc + regular osc can not sound like a 101. In particular with the filter more open. Yours were mostly quite filtered.

Post

Echoes in the Attic wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:15 pm It can sound very close as your examples show, however I've done really close comparisons and there are many settings where sub osc + regular osc can not sound like a 101. In particular with the filter more open. Yours were mostly quite filtered.
Were you testing Strobe 1 or 2?

Post

Uncle E wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 7:07 pm
Echoes in the Attic wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:15 pm It can sound very close as your examples show, however I've done really close comparisons and there are many settings where sub osc + regular osc can not sound like a 101. In particular with the filter more open. Yours were mostly quite filtered.
Were you testing Strobe 1 or 2?
V2. To be fair it was probably a small range of potential sounds that couldn't match, but it is an element of the 101 I really like, which is the sub osc with either/or the saw and square osc mixed in to it, at low bass range notes, with a pretty open filter. The 101 has a pretty unique sound there. I had been comparing several 101 type synths to see which really got close in that range. Interestingly Bazille got closer to a 101 for the specific osc range I was testing than Strobe did. The Reaktor 101 type osc block was quite accurate and obviously the TAL and Roland were best.

Post

himalaya wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 3:40 pm You have to use Strobe's sub-oscillator to get the 101 sound. The following demos were made with Strobe v1 and a real Roland SH-101, each file plays the same riff on both synths:

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... y_saw1.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Growl.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Nasal.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... bounce.wav

http://www.electric-himalaya.com/stuff/ ... _Synth.wav
Which one comes first?
A well-behaved signature.

Post

You tell me :)
http://www.electric-himalaya.com
VSTi and hardware synth sound design
3D/5D sound design since 2012

Post

himalaya wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2020 11:47 pm You tell me :)
I'd say the SH-101 is first. It sounds richer and rounder to me, though not by much.
A well-behaved signature.

Post

I wish Expansion would update Orca to 64 bit!
Orion Platinum, Muzys 2

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”