I said before that most sample libraries are over-priced. This is but one example.
That Kepler product is also absolutely overpriced. It's ostensibly useless musically and there are products similarly priced that are far more musically-capable. I already mentioned that, but you must have missed that.
The BBC one? Maybe, maybe not. I haven't seen much of it. However, I do know that at least some of their products Albion One and Kepler come to mind, are not "insanely detailed" or very capable.
It's truly a miracle that we have the technology at all to take the sound of an orchestra, which costs 10s of thousands to record IRL, and put it in a computer for any musician to use.koolkeys wrote: ↑Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:55 pmBut I think if you were to receive the bill they have to pay just to make these libraries, it would blow your mind. How much does it cost to pay 90-100 (or more) professional musicians to sit there and play for 2-4 weeks in a world-class full-size recording facility? I don't know. But it's certainly not cheap
It's also true that this is an emotional, philosophical sort of argument that has no utility in determining market value of consumer products in a market with a lot of competition within itself.
Presumably, one would buy a sample library to make mockups of music that instrument would actually play. Less-capable libraries in the price-range of those who are more-capable can fairly be said to be over-priced.
If someone offered to sell you their 20-year-old Toyota with a transmission that only could shift into Neutral and 2nd gear for an asking price of $600, would you be like "Sure! A BMW costs WAAAAY more and it's a miracle that cars exist at all!"
Or, would you tell that person that the price they're asking for their debilitated car is too much, considering you can buy used-cars for $600 that will have a fully-functional transmission?