Genesis Pro
-
Distorted Horizon Distorted Horizon https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=392076
- Banned
- 3882 posts since 17 Jan, 2017 from Planet of cats
Viper is available as x64 so not a same story
-
- KVRian
- 1355 posts since 27 Oct, 2009
SynthEdit exports 64-bit Win/Mac plugins, so even if Genesis Pro starts as a 32-bit only VSTi, it doesn't mean it'll stay that way forever. Right now Reaper hosts both 32 and 64 bit plugins beautifully, via its robust internal bridge.
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
Let's hope for the best, but as I understand the old modules are the deal-breaker here.
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
Distorted Horizon Distorted Horizon https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=392076
- Banned
- 3882 posts since 17 Jan, 2017 from Planet of cats
Looks like that genesis pro is going to be genesis semi pro
Well.. Time will tell..
Well.. Time will tell..
- Banned
- 10732 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
he coded all the modules himself... and its flowstone, not se
-
- KVRAF
- 35436 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
TBH, my interest in this synth is limited, especially when it's 32-bit only (I don't like bridging), and, when there is no custom coded synth engine, or modules. I understand that not everyone is a developer, but, I really don't think the SynthEdit stuff sounds that good, custom modules or not. Just my opinion.
What I definitely like is the approach. I think there's a serious lack of software synths which are build with the help of artists, or, tailored to artists. Actually, that's the one thing I find is better in hardware: Manufacturers there either have a long history and experience in what they do, or, they know exactly what their customers, speak, the artists want. This synths seems well thought out for sure. It's rather the rest which I don't dig too much. Plus, the fact that I already have loads of (nice sounding) synths doing similar things. Rather a general thing though, that I feel well setup with what I have, and not specific to this synth.
What I definitely like is the approach. I think there's a serious lack of software synths which are build with the help of artists, or, tailored to artists. Actually, that's the one thing I find is better in hardware: Manufacturers there either have a long history and experience in what they do, or, they know exactly what their customers, speak, the artists want. This synths seems well thought out for sure. It's rather the rest which I don't dig too much. Plus, the fact that I already have loads of (nice sounding) synths doing similar things. Rather a general thing though, that I feel well setup with what I have, and not specific to this synth.
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
its a very very strange aproach to this one, especialy "i really dont think the synthedit stuff sounds that good". In the end you who makes the sound good, not the synth.chk071 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:05 pm TBH, my interest in this synth is limited, especially when it's 32-bit only (I don't like bridging), and, when there is no custom coded synth engine, or modules. I understand that not everyone is a developer, but, I really don't think the SynthEdit stuff sounds that good, custom modules or not. Just my opinion.
What I definitely like is the approach. I think there's a serious lack of software synths which are build with the help of artists, or, tailored to artists. Actually, that's the one thing I find is better in hardware: Manufacturers there either have a long history and experience in what they do, or, they know exactly what their customers, speak, the artists want. This synths seems well thought out for sure. It's rather the rest which I don't dig too much. Plus, the fact that I already have loads of (nice sounding) synths doing similar things. Rather a general thing though, that I feel well setup with what I have, and not specific to this synth.
-
- KVRAF
- 35436 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Just ask yourself if you would exclusively use Steinberg Neon for your music. If it was like you said, we could just buy or download a single synth, and be happy ever after. Not how it works, I'm afraid.
- KVRian
- 814 posts since 11 Mar, 2010
Sorry, but I've got to disagree. Each synth (and company) has its own signature sound, and most of them are not that pleasing or that inspiring to me. Anyway, let's hope GP is a good one!Elektronisch wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:30 pmits a very very strange aproach to this one, especialy "i really dont think the synthedit stuff sounds that good". In the end you who makes the sound good, not the synth.chk071 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:05 pm TBH, my interest in this synth is limited, especially when it's 32-bit only (I don't like bridging), and, when there is no custom coded synth engine, or modules. I understand that not everyone is a developer, but, I really don't think the SynthEdit stuff sounds that good, custom modules or not. Just my opinion.
What I definitely like is the approach. I think there's a serious lack of software synths which are build with the help of artists, or, tailored to artists. Actually, that's the one thing I find is better in hardware: Manufacturers there either have a long history and experience in what they do, or, they know exactly what their customers, speak, the artists want. This synths seems well thought out for sure. It's rather the rest which I don't dig too much. Plus, the fact that I already have loads of (nice sounding) synths doing similar things. Rather a general thing though, that I feel well setup with what I have, and not specific to this synth.
-
Distorted Horizon Distorted Horizon https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=392076
- Banned
- 3882 posts since 17 Jan, 2017 from Planet of cats
If it was the only option, easily
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
Same here
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
Well if most of them arent inspiring then music is not for you.Sinisterbr wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:08 pmSorry, but I've got to disagree. Each synth (and company) has its own signature sound, and most of them are not that pleasing or that inspiring to me. Anyway, let's hope GP is a good one!Elektronisch wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:30 pmits a very very strange aproach to this one, especialy "i really dont think the synthedit stuff sounds that good". In the end you who makes the sound good, not the synth.chk071 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 12:05 pm TBH, my interest in this synth is limited, especially when it's 32-bit only (I don't like bridging), and, when there is no custom coded synth engine, or modules. I understand that not everyone is a developer, but, I really don't think the SynthEdit stuff sounds that good, custom modules or not. Just my opinion.
What I definitely like is the approach. I think there's a serious lack of software synths which are build with the help of artists, or, tailored to artists. Actually, that's the one thing I find is better in hardware: Manufacturers there either have a long history and experience in what they do, or, they know exactly what their customers, speak, the artists want. This synths seems well thought out for sure. It's rather the rest which I don't dig too much. Plus, the fact that I already have loads of (nice sounding) synths doing similar things. Rather a general thing though, that I feel well setup with what I have, and not specific to this synth.
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
I tend to agree, while the mixing and sound-designing skills are the most improtant part of the equation, I think there is still a lack of nice-sounding "characterful" synths not being emulations of some vintage analog stuff.Sinisterbr wrote: ↑Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:08 pm Sorry, but I've got to disagree. Each synth (and company) has its own signature sound, and most of them are not that pleasing or that inspiring to me. Anyway, let's hope GP is a good one!
It may be a bit odd to expect this from an old SE creation but from my memory Genesis CM did sound very good. I didn't have a lot of stuff to compare back then tho.
Last edited by recursive one on Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
this guy made a sequencer out of Excel and he didnt complain how Excel purpose isnt making music
And with sound not sounding nice? come one, the only limitation is your own imagination, i have heard amazing sounds made out with Sytrus (10 years ago i thought its a bad sounding synth, what was i thikinking) on top of that with great post processing. Real producers know their shit and how to work with it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFdCM2kHL64
And with sound not sounding nice? come one, the only limitation is your own imagination, i have heard amazing sounds made out with Sytrus (10 years ago i thought its a bad sounding synth, what was i thikinking) on top of that with great post processing. Real producers know their shit and how to work with it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFdCM2kHL64
Last edited by Elektronisch on Tue Feb 04, 2020 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.